- Sep 25, 2001
- 29,391
- 2,738
- 126
from this thread:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?p=29733846&posted=1#post29733846
I've heard from people in my bowling league that if you got laid off, it's better to file for unemployment in MA because they pay more, even if you dont work/live in that state
(MA pays $628 to $942 per WEEK, depending on your eligibility)
i always thought it was the state where you worked that you file.
i asked my acquaintances why would MA pay if you dont live or work there. somel of them said they dont know. it just is. others said MA back charges your state for the amount.
so is it possible to file for unemployment in MA even if you never lived or worked there? if so, why would MA allow such a thing?
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?p=29733846&posted=1#post29733846
I've heard from people in my bowling league that if you got laid off, it's better to file for unemployment in MA because they pay more, even if you dont work/live in that state
(MA pays $628 to $942 per WEEK, depending on your eligibility)
i always thought it was the state where you worked that you file.
i asked my acquaintances why would MA pay if you dont live or work there. somel of them said they dont know. it just is. others said MA back charges your state for the amount.
so is it possible to file for unemployment in MA even if you never lived or worked there? if so, why would MA allow such a thing?
