- Jul 13, 2005
- 33,981
- 3,318
- 126
that was an ignorant statement....Thank you for proving my point
that was an ignorant statement....Thank you for proving my point
Ahh yes, tarrifs, the wonderful trade practice that is more akin to shooting yourself in the foot. After all, they don't punish the exporter, they punish the consumer. So any tariff is ultimately paid by us.
China bought lots of US soybeans. You know what happened when Trump started the trade war?
China bought soybeans from somewhere else and the federal government had to provide tens of billions in aid to soybean farmers.
How about steel? Tariffs on Chinese steel raised prices for construction, which ultimately reduced the number of construction jobs.
In fact, the entire trade war cost the US roughly 1.7T in capital gains and we lost about 300B in trade, on top of all the jobs lost.
Trump's policies have been massive failures across the board.
As I said, we are at war, CCP has been attacking and stealing from us for years, which was costing us billions anyways, if we retaliated early then it would have cause less pain, but we started now, it's going to be painful, we will lose money, jobs, but it will be worth it. Even radical leftists agree that ecenomy pre-covid was not doing bad, Trump did a good job there.
All major countries wanted to avoid the war, played appeasers to avoid conflict with CCP, too afraid to anger CCP, just like they did in the years leading up to WW2, not a smart strategy. Evil does not just go away, in the end it will try to obliterate you if you don't stop it in time.
So what you're saying is that bin Laden attacked the WTC because GW was weak?Stupid question. Trump has made American military and other agencies strong enough to deter any such attack, moreover he has also weakened the terrorists and allied with some of them, no one is in the position to launch such attacks. And those who say that he would nuke someone, you are right, and that's why no one will dare do it as long as he is in command. People attack other people only when they know that they can win or get away with it (I am taking about the funders not the terrorists themselves).
As I said, we are at war, CCP has been attacking and stealing from us for years, which was costing us billions anyways, if we retaliated early then it would have cause less pain, but we started now, it's going to be painful, we will lose money, jobs, but it will be worth it. Even radical leftists agree that ecenomy pre-covid was not doing bad, Trump did a good job there.
All major countries wanted to avoid the war, played appeasers to avoid conflict with CCP, too afraid to anger CCP, just like they did in the years leading up to WW2, not a smart strategy. Evil does not just go away, in the end it will try to obliterate you if you don't stop it in time.
The thing about Trump's plan is that it never had any chance of working, but apparently Trump just does not understand how tariffs can work. For a tariffs to work they have to encourage buyers to shop local instead of buying from the tariffed country. In Trump's case the tariffs were never high enough to make American products competitive, and he put tariffs on the raw materials that local companies would need to produce local goods without opening up a new avenue for those companies to get the raw materials they needed. At that point it became nothing more than a tax on American buyers.As I said, we are at war, CCP has been attacking and stealing from us for years, which was costing us billions anyways, if we retaliated early then it would have cause less pain, but we started now, it's going to be painful, we will lose money, jobs, but it will be worth it. Even radical leftists agree that ecenomy pre-covid was not doing bad, Trump did a good job there.
All major countries wanted to avoid the war, played appeasers to avoid conflict with CCP, too afraid to anger CCP, just like they did in the years leading up to WW2, not a smart strategy. Evil does not just go away, in the end it will try to obliterate you if you don't stop it in time.