Originally posted by: UNCjigga
Well maybe if more Senate seats were up for grabs Dems would take it. Lemme ask you this--how many GOP incumbents lost, and how many Dem incumbents lost? There's your story. Did you see what happened in Rhode Island? Exit polls showed 62% approved of GOP incumbent Chafee's job performance, but he lost BIG to Whitehouse--because voters were voting AGAINST Bush.
Oh and don't be surprised if moderate Republicans in the Senate split with Bush and his cabinet on a number of major issues...they know Bush's ship is sinking and they're not all willing to go down with it. Likewise, I know Lieberman won't always side with Pelosi and the Dems.
I'm looking forward to 2 years of hell for Bush and his agenda, and I bet his right hand is gonna get tired of swinging that veto pen.
Here's the kicker, though . . . if Bush doesn't learn to play nice with the Democrats . . . his legacy will be HUGE deficits, weakened middle class, debacle in Iraq, and killing the GOP majority.
If they are smart (and I'm not convinced) Democrats will 'try' to send him:
1) permanent repeal of marriage penalty
2) make child tax credit permanent (although likely reduced amount and means tested)
3) modest increase in minimum wage
4) modifications to Drug Benefit - negotiated prices, reduce doughnut hole, etc
5) comprehensive immigration reform
6) maybe even toss in some education credits
7) possibly consumer and industry tax credits for alternative energy/conservation
A whole bunch of Republicans will ride those trains . . . possibly enough to be veto proof. On the otherhand, if Bush signs them he can take credit for a rather progressive domestic agenda which is a far cry from his Top 10% policies to date.
Other tax cuts will expire (and the AMT will catch more and more people) but both of those factors will likely make the long-term fiscal picture look much better.
As for the I-word . . . both parties will likely use the commission report as cover . . . even if they don't follow whatever is recommended.