eits
Lifer
it's not irrelevant, jackalass... it's a response telling john not to be careless in his assessment of who has the terrorist friends.
YOUR question to ME is the irrelevant one.
it's not irrelevant, jackalass... it's a response telling john not to be careless in his assessment of who has the terrorist friends.
YOUR question to ME is the irrelevant one.
The media and the politicians in this country who are trying to drum up support for attacking Iran. Unfortunately, they may just be able to do it. Apparently there are still plenty of sheep who are willing to blindly follow this administration into yet another war despite the complete bungle that is Iraq.
Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 33,438
- 7,503
- 136
The world has not been that simple since the days of Kings. If you?re referring specifically to the country of Iran, what nation isn?t prepared for the successor to their current leader? Worse in this case scenario, it?s the religious leaders who truly run that country.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Leader_of_Iran
Islamic Supremacism is a Hydra. Cutting off a head is only symbolic, it is the body ? the ideology that carries them through.
eits
Lifer
omg, you really are dumb as hell, aren't you?... ism.
almost the entire country rejects the ideology... as we who know what we're talking about have tried telling you many times.
Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 33,438
- 7,503
- 136
He's part of the Iranian government. The Iranian government itself is a czar of terrorism from Hezbollah in Lebanon to the Taliban in Pakistan. Trying to distance the President from that is irrelevant to the subject. Whether it?s Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who commands them will not change their response.
Moreover, what basis do you have for saying he isn?t friends with radicals? He himself is one.
eits
Lifer
where the hell is the proof of that?
and ahmadinejad doesn't control shit. just stfu... seriously. you're just talking out of your ass again.
Just for your information, the CIA's opinion is that he has never taken part to it....
Quote:
CNN has reported from multiple official sources[1] the result of a CIA investigation into whether Ahmedinejad was involved in the hostage taking:
A CIA report has determined with "relative certainty" that Iran's new president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was not involved in the taking of U.S. hostages 26 years ago, three government officials told CNN... Another U.S. official said the tone of the report is that there is no evidence to date that the new Iranian president was among those who held U.S. diplomats hostage.[1]
The CNN report continues stating that "CIA analysis of a photograph of one of the hostage-takers determined that the man was not Ahmadinejad."[1]
eits
Lifer
Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 33,438
- 7,503
- 136
Iranian weapons in Taliban hands has been news all over the place. Do you only listen to what you like to hear?
http://www.google.com/search?h...ban&btnG=Google+Search
I never said he "controlled shit". Why do you spout that crap by which you make me your strawman?
People are really getting out of control with this War on Terror charade. I honestly can't stand all this non-sense fear anymore.
So they found Iranian made weapons in Iraq? Wow, that's some news! How about the 90% of Russian-made weapons the guerrilla is using in Iraq? Does it mean Russia is involved?
Do you know where the weapons used in the Rwanda massacre came from? What about the Angola civil war? Did it mean the nations where those weapons were fabricated were directly involved in those conflicts?
Hint: weapons trafficking is the second largest organized crime source of revenues in the world. I have personally seen guerrilla forces in the Caprivi strip using American weapons in the early 90s. Was the US government supporting the Namibian guerrilla?
palehorse
Lifer
- Dec 21, 2005
- 11,521
- 0
- 76
Assassinating Ahmadinejad would be a mistake, especially on US soil. Besides, the real powers, and the sources of our problems, are the Mullahs.
The best we can hope for in Iran is a popular uprising that leads to a coup that installs liberal, modern, and sensible new leadership.
The best we can hope for in Iran is a popular uprising that leads to a coup that installs liberal, modern, and sensible new leadership.
eits
Lifer
palehorse
Lifer
- Dec 21, 2005
- 11,521
- 0
- 76
The mullahs in Iran collectively represent a bankrupt and fundamentalist ideology whose survival depends on both internal oppression and expansion of a stone-age ideology. They directly control the Revolutionary Guard, Hezbollah, and Iran's research in nuclear weaponry - three items that directly effect the safety and stability of the entire ME region, and beyond.
next question?
Hezbollah and Iran's research of nuclear technology are not a threat to the U.S.
Iran is an instability in the region? The U.S has invaded two nations in that region and you say Iran is an instability?
- Oct 30, 2000
- 42,591
- 5
- 0
Iran doesn't give WMD to Hezbollah or Hamas.
It has chemical weapons and neither of those groups has any of it.
It is the U.S who gives it to nations to use on people fighting for their lives.
Irans government isnt like the united states. There is no real checks and balances, the president of iran, Ahmadinejad is elected by the people yes, but he has no real power. He is more like a figurehead and spokesperson of the country. The person who is at the top is Supreme Leader Grand Ayatolla Ali Khamenei. this guy is elected by a private islamic assembly and he holds power over the armed forces as well as judiciary (law making body).
basically if you're going to take anyone out, take out the Grand Ayatolla, the president and vice president of Iran or merely puppets with strings. lets say you did take out the president, there would be major international outcry and it would be regarded as an act of war. the US government has already expressed that they do not wish to invade Iran, Ahmadinejad knows this, which is why he has the balls to walk into the country (from invitation of the United Nations) and use the laws of freedom of speech in the US to his favor (deliever propaganda).
Iranian people are smart, they know what they are doing. I had a highschool buddy of Iranian descent who immigrate from iran and he got perfect scores on his SAT and got accepted to Harvard. I know that doesnt constitute their entire population, but they're not as dumb as most Americans make them out to be either from ignorance or just short-sightedness.
basically if you're going to take anyone out, take out the Grand Ayatolla, the president and vice president of Iran or merely puppets with strings. lets say you did take out the president, there would be major international outcry and it would be regarded as an act of war. the US government has already expressed that they do not wish to invade Iran, Ahmadinejad knows this, which is why he has the balls to walk into the country (from invitation of the United Nations) and use the laws of freedom of speech in the US to his favor (deliever propaganda).
Iranian people are smart, they know what they are doing. I had a highschool buddy of Iranian descent who immigrate from iran and he got perfect scores on his SAT and got accepted to Harvard. I know that doesnt constitute their entire population, but they're not as dumb as most Americans make them out to be either from ignorance or just short-sightedness.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 10K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 7K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter