• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

If I can't have it she can't either

Sounds like a reasonable approach to divorce to me. Better than the ex-wife and lawyers getting it.
 
If it's community property ... and he wouldn't be worried about losing it if it wasn't, I think he will still owe her half of the value before it was destroyed. She may have to sue to get it, but I bet she wins.

Why wouldn't it be considered arson? Maybe was paid off and uninsured?
 
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Better than the ex-wife and lawyers getting it.

How is that better? He's just as homeless either way.
Yeah, but this way he has the knowledge that he screwed her out of her share without a lawyer taking a cut for good measure.
 
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Better than the ex-wife and lawyers getting it.

How is that better? He's just as homeless either way.

I agree...I used to think that way myself until I went through divorce(s) . What he did was childish and stupid and definately is /was a no win situation.


Sysadmin
 
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Better than the ex-wife and lawyers getting it.

How is that better? He's just as homeless either way.
Yeah, but this way he has the knowledge that he screwed her out of her share without a lawyer taking a cut for good measure.



What does he do when his Ex sues him for the lost asset? No Win situation.


Sysadmin
 
Back
Top