You apparently don't understand something: Rules. Hilary and Obama knew the rules and how the game was scored. They were each supposed to play that game to win. Looking back on it and making such claims is like looking back on a game of scrabble and proclaiming that "well, the loser would have won if the biggest words counted more. The other guy only won because he kept getting the triple letter scores." Seriously, do you think that if the rules were changed that their campaign strategies wouldn't have?Originally posted by: sportage
Like Hillary said many times, if it were winner take all, she would have won long ago.
Like the republicans, thats why Mccain won so fast over the others.
As a democrat, I have to add only the democrats could screw up an election process so badly. I still think Howard Dean is a jerk and a moron.
Why they meet and make these retarded rules is beyond logic.
Maybe thats one reason the republicans keep winning where it counts.
And no doubt the democrats will put on another one of their namby pamby love fest conventions, while the republicans go right for the throat.
Remember Zell Miller?