if everyone lived like you, how many planets would we need?

PottedMeat

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
12,363
475
126
http://www.earthday.net/Footprint/index.asp
........................


it seems like the maximum is 20.1 earths


CATEGORY ACRES

FOOD 5.9

MOBILITY 0.2

SHELTER 7.2

GOODS/SERVICES 4.9

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 18



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.




IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.1 PLANETS.
 

Gunslinger08

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
13,234
2
81
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 2.7
SHELTER 4.4
GOODS/SERVICES 6.4
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 20



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.



IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.6 PLANETS.
 

JoeKing

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,641
1
81
14.1 earths would be needed if the world were full of me :evil:

FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 4.7
SHELTER 21.5
GOODS/SERVICES 29.6
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 63

and proud of it :thumbsup:
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Oh sweet, we'd need 6.9 planets for me!

CATEGORY ACRES

FOOD 6.2

MOBILITY 7.2

SHELTER 5.7

GOODS/SERVICES 11.6

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 31
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,982
4,592
126
6.6 since I have a large house. Other than that factor, there would need to be many fewer Earths in that calculation. Of course my answer is just to have fewer people. Seems easier than having more Earths.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,567
126
why does locally grown matter so much? what if you live in a relatively nonproductive area?
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0


CATEGORY ACRES

FOOD 4.9

MOBILITY 3.5

SHELTER 4.4

GOODS/SERVICES 7.2

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 20



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.




IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.5 PLANETS.


What do I win?
 

Tifababy

Senior member
Feb 5, 2001
654
1
81
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 5.9
MOBILITY 1.7
SHELTER 17.3
GOODS/SERVICES 17.3
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 42

Doh, looks like we need 9.5 planets for me.
 

ElMonoDelMar

Golden Member
Apr 29, 2004
1,163
338
136


CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 1
SHELTER 6.9
GOODS/SERVICES 7.2
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 22



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.



IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.9 PLANETS.


I'm a disgrace to all Americans. Sorry for bringing down the average :(
 

Tremulant

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2004
4,890
1
0
CATEGORY ACRES

FOOD 4.2

MOBILITY 5.9

SHELTER 4.4

GOODS/SERVICES 9.4

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 24



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.




IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 5.4 PLANETS.

 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,567
126
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: ElFenix
why does locally grown matter so much? what if you live in a relatively nonproductive area?
Transportation costs.

couldn't the added productivity outweigh the transport costs?
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,982
4,592
126
Originally posted by: z0mb13
I wonder if anyone got < 1 planet
I put in every ecological option possible for someone my age and gender. I got 4 acres needed, 4.5 acres per person, yet still 1.0 planets required. I assume it is programmed to round up to 1.
 

crab

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2001
7,330
19
81
CATEGORY ACRES

FOOD 6.2

MOBILITY 1

SHELTER 2.7

GOODS/SERVICES 2.5

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 12