Originally posted by: Vic
Bingo!Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
He has the right to go find another chick to have babies with.
And she has the right to ties up his wage for the next 18 years.
Originally posted by: Vic
Bingo!Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
He has the right to go find another chick to have babies with.
Originally posted by: crystal
Originally posted by: Vic
Bingo!Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
He has the right to go find another chick to have babies with.
And she has the right to ties up his wage for the next 18 years.![]()
Originally posted by: BigToque
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
It's her choice, as it should be.
This is going to absolutely derail the thread, but then why should the man not have the choice to not support the child if the roles were reversed and the woman wanted the kid and the man wanted an abortion?
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: crystal
Originally posted by: Vic
Bingo!Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
He has the right to go find another chick to have babies with.
And she has the right to ties up his wage for the next 18 years.![]()
Exactly. Thats why this issue pisses me off so much.
You think having a baby is oh-so-life changing? Well losing 50% of your income aint no walk in the park.
Its so completely unfair that a woman has all the say in the issue and the man has none.
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: yukichigai
None, and I'll tell you why: the guy isn't the one who has to spend 9 months throwing up every morning, peeing every 5 minutes, inhaling food like a garbage disposal and going damn near crazy from the hormones. As soon as the day comes that a doctor can safely pop the fetus out of the woman and put it into a) an artificial womb of some kind, or b) the guy who wants to keep the kid, then men will have equal rights over whether or not to keep the baby.
Frankly, I really want to see that type of procedure become available. Rather than forcing, say, a recently raped woman to choose between an unwanted pregnancy or terminating a fetus, it would be a wonderful thing to offer the option of removing the fetus and letting it become a child without having it cause havoc with her body. The woman keeps control of her body, the possibility of life becomes actual life. Everybody wins!
Yeah, and the girl isnt the one who spends the next 18 years supporting a deadbeat mother and kid.
Its so completely unfair that a woman has all the say in the issue and the man has none.
Well, prior to that, you had the right to bring balloons to the party!Originally posted by: crystal
And she has the right to ties up his wage for the next 18 years.Originally posted by: Vic
Bingo!Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
He has the right to go find another chick to have babies with.![]()
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
It's her choice, as it should be.
DIAF
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
It's her choice, as it should be.
DIAF
?
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
It's her choice, as it should be.
DIAF
?
The post was completely void of value and, more importantly, thought. 99% of the people I've met who take the overly simplistic stance of "it's her choice and it should be" are speaking from a total lack of perspective and experience.
Originally posted by: Vic
Well, prior to that, you had the right to bring balloons to the party!Originally posted by: crystal
And she has the right to ties up his wage for the next 18 years.Originally posted by: Vic
Bingo!Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
He has the right to go find another chick to have babies with.![]()
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
It's her choice, as it should be.
DIAF
?
The post was completely void of value and, more importantly, thought. 99% of the people I've met who take the overly simplistic stance of "it's her choice and it should be" are speaking from a total lack of perspective and experience.
There's no need for him to reiterate whats been said by others already. I was going to post something more lengthy myself, but most of it has already been said in one form or another.
Originally posted by: OS
Originally posted by: Vic
Well, prior to that, you had the right to bring balloons to the party!Originally posted by: crystal
And she has the right to ties up his wage for the next 18 years.Originally posted by: Vic
Bingo!Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
He has the right to go find another chick to have babies with.![]()
this is obviously harder to prove, but i was reading some articles/stories where women lied to the men about being on the pill and then when they got pregnant, they wanted to keep it.
Originally posted by: Leros
Here is the problem.
If the woman wants the kid, but the man wants an abortion, the man has to pay child support for the kid even though he does not want the kid. The man gets no choice, but has to pay.
Now, if the woman wants to abort the child, but the man wants to keep the child (and offers to single handidly pay and raise for it) he has no choice.
This is not equal at all. The woman is given more power in a situation where they both have equal responsibilty for the conception of the child.
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
It's her choice, as it should be.
DIAF
?
The post was completely void of value and, more importantly, thought. 99% of the people I've met who take the overly simplistic stance of "it's her choice and it should be" are speaking from a total lack of perspective and experience.
There's no need for him to reiterate whats been said by others already. I was going to post something more lengthy myself, but most of it has already been said in one form or another.
Then why post at all?
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
It's her choice, as it should be.
DIAF
?
The post was completely void of value and, more importantly, thought. 99% of the people I've met who take the overly simplistic stance of "it's her choice and it should be" are speaking from a total lack of perspective and experience.
Originally posted by: Leros
Here is the problem.
If the woman wants the kid, but the man wants an abortion, the man has to pay child support for the kid even though he does not want the kid. The man gets no choice, but has to pay.
Now, if the woman wants to abort the child, but the man wants to keep the child (and offers to single handidly pay and raise for it) he has no choice.
This is not equal at all. The woman is given more power in a situation where they both have equal responsibilty for the conception of the child.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
It's her choice, as it should be.
DIAF
?
The post was completely void of value and, more importantly, thought. 99% of the people I've met who take the overly simplistic stance of "it's her choice and it should be" are speaking from a total lack of perspective and experience.
It's absurd to say that a woman should be forced to carry a child to term if she does not want to.
A better topic of discussion would be why a man is not allowed to abdicate his parental responsibilities (including financial responsibilities) early in the pregnancy when the woman is capable of making a decision to keep the child based on that.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
It's her choice, as it should be.
DIAF
?
The post was completely void of value and, more importantly, thought. 99% of the people I've met who take the overly simplistic stance of "it's her choice and it should be" are speaking from a total lack of perspective and experience.
It's absurd to say that a woman should be forced to carry a child to term if she does not want to.
A better topic of discussion would be why a man is not allowed to abdicate his parental responsibilities (including financial responsibilities) early in the pregnancy when the woman is capable of making a decision to keep the child based on that.
