Hahahaah you find your "sources" to be science? They are all fucking questionnaires that have their own questionable bias' as well. What a great time to question people IMMEDIATELY after a post-op to ask them if they are more satisfied.
Suicide isn't a bullshit questionnaire to "rate your happiness". Also not sure what you're trying to indicate about the parts in my linked study, if this chart doesn't give a flashing warning light then you're simply too stupid for words. Which isn't surprising given your inept position.
But go ahead and keep pedaling your own narrative to suite your cognitive dissonance peon.
Hahaha. I needed a big laugh. This is great. Questionnaires aren't science, huh? Then why did you post this:
s0me0nesmind1 said:
Hmm, what does it say on the cover page?
"Suicide Attempts among Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Adults
FINDINGS OF THE NATIONAL TRANSGENDER DISCRIMINATION
SURVEY"
LMAO. Good job on further demonstrating zero intellectual integrity. You posted a questionnaire, which isn't science according to you, but then apparently a questionnaire is a sufficient basis of your idiotic conclusion.
SInce you posted the table for everyone to see, what is the title of Table 5? Read it. What does it say as the very first word?
LIFETIME suicide attempts...
When they conducted your questionnaire, they asked each subject "
Have you ever attempted suicide?” (See their methods and limitations section). Did you notice the word ever? They asked each person if they ever attempted suicide, it doesn't matter if was 10 years ago, 10 months ago, 10 days ago, or 10 hours ago. That means each person could have attempted suicide BEFORE or AFTER surgery, they did not ask when they had the suicide attempt in relation to the surgery.
Or better yet, why don't you read the sentence right after your highlighted text in your image:
"This pattern was observed all transition-related services and procedures that were explored in the NTDS. The survey did not provide information about the timing of reported suicide attempts in relation to receiving transition-related health care, which precluded investigation of transition-related explanations for these patterns. "
The investigators of your questionnaire freely admit they did not ask when the subjects attempted suicide, so they cannot determine if surgery reduced suicide or not. Yet, because you didn't read the study nor the table/text you posted, you come to your intellectually dishonest conclusions. For shame.
And again, what were the follow-up times of these studies, since you read them?
-
Greater post-operative satisfaction
-
Equal quality of body image and sexual life compared to cis people
-Low incidences of regret (between
2.2% and
3.8%)
-
Expectations met at an emotional and social level
-
95% reporting a global favorable outcome
-
Higher degrees of well-being and social integration
Here's a hint, some of them are in the abstract... In addition, how is quantifying the incidence of regret a questionnaire? Further evidence you didn't read a single study in that group. Why not read the meta-analyses?
I highly suggest you delete your posts if you are genuinely concerned about science and intellectual honesty. You've demonstrated zero capacity to read your own questionnaires or even the text of a table that you post on here. Its hilarious watching you flounder worse than SlowSpyder.