- Mar 11, 2000
- 24,055
- 1,697
- 126
Here are the PPC 970FX PowerTune details, from this article (Japanese):
[*] It is fabbed on a 90nm, 10-layer metal, Cu-SOI process
[*] Transistor count (58 million) is not changed from 130nm version
[*] Die size is shrunk from 118mm^2 to 62mm^2
[*] Frequency is 1.3-2.5GHz
[*] In "normal" mode, 970+ changes the frequency in three steps; full, 1/2 and 1/4.
[*] As the change of frequency, the core voltage is also scaled
[*] From any combination of frequency/voltage, 970+ can move to "nap" mode
[*] In "deep nap" mode, the frequency is reduced to 1/64.
[*] Typical power usage is ~50W@2.5GHz (normal voltage), 31W@625MHz (normal voltage) and 15W@625MHz (1.0V).
Sounds great for a quiet high-end desktop, and also good (at say 1.6 GHz) for a PowerBook or revised iMac. (The 1.6 would be a lower voltage version. IBM specs a 1.4 GHz that runs normally at 1.0 V and that has a typical power usage of ~12 Watts.)
[*] It is fabbed on a 90nm, 10-layer metal, Cu-SOI process
[*] Transistor count (58 million) is not changed from 130nm version
[*] Die size is shrunk from 118mm^2 to 62mm^2
[*] Frequency is 1.3-2.5GHz
[*] In "normal" mode, 970+ changes the frequency in three steps; full, 1/2 and 1/4.
[*] As the change of frequency, the core voltage is also scaled
[*] From any combination of frequency/voltage, 970+ can move to "nap" mode
[*] In "deep nap" mode, the frequency is reduced to 1/64.
[*] Typical power usage is ~50W@2.5GHz (normal voltage), 31W@625MHz (normal voltage) and 15W@625MHz (1.0V).
Sounds great for a quiet high-end desktop, and also good (at say 1.6 GHz) for a PowerBook or revised iMac. (The 1.6 would be a lower voltage version. IBM specs a 1.4 GHz that runs normally at 1.0 V and that has a typical power usage of ~12 Watts.)