• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

IBM launches dual-core PowerPC 970 chip

Matrix21

Member
IBM launches dual-core PowerPC 970 chip


IBM introduced this week the dual-core version of its PowerPC 970 processor during the Power Everywhere Forum 2005 in Japan. The chips, which are also widely known as G5s in the world of Macs, were officially labeled as PowerPC 970MP, and will be available in speeds ranging from 1.4GHz to 2.5GHz.

The 64-bit chips, code-named Antares, contain two processing units per chip, each with their own execution core and Level 1 cache. Additionally, each core includes a storage subsystem with 1MB Level 2 cache, making the chips twice as efficient as IBM's current 970FX PowerPC G5 processors. Despite of the fact Apple announced a few weeks ago they were switching from PowerPC to Intel processors, the move is expected to take at least a couple more years, making the new dual-core processors a logical step forward for upgrading its existing line of Power Mac G5 and iMac G5 systems.

Additionally, IBM announced the launch of new low-power PowerPC 970FX processors that will run at 1.4 GHz to 1.6 GHz, while operating at less than 20 watts.
 
probably, but a big (sole?) reason Apple is switching to "intel" is because of the Pentium-M (my theory anyways) and any future technology involving it. The G5 is a desktop chip, not intended for mobile use, which is why we have not seen a G5 laptop. While it makes a worthy desktop chip, it just isn't good for laptops, especially not compared to the Pentium-M - which is phenominal for laptops but not perfect for desktops. It'd definatley perfect their laptop line with future P-M -> desktop technology highly attractive for their low profile iMacs and Mac Minis.

Jobs did mention there would be some great IBM products coming in the mean time in the transition, but nothing ultimately better than the switch to x86...
 
Back
Top