- Feb 22, 2001
- 3,044
- 543
- 136
I recently updated my son's gaming computer with a simple Z370 board an a i5-8600 non-K.
During his normal (heavy gaming) usage, the CPU was registering > 90' regularly.
He has a large case with front intake fans, and a rear-top-side(GPU) exhaust fan.
The persistent > 90'C temps bugged me, so I purchased him a "beQuiet Shadow Rock 2" HSF from the local computer store.
The thing is massive.
We got it installed, and it immediately was > 90' -- he launched a game and it went over 100'.
OK - mistake found. I had mounted the backplate in the wrong orientation.
After rotating the backplate, his gaming temps are now in the low-mid 70's. Running the FurMark CPU stress test, he see's 82-83.
Does this seem to be "in the ballpark?"
It still seems too warm to me - it's a non-K chip in a large case with lots of airflow.
My only point of *reference is from a review where it looks like they used a water-cooler (?) and hit a max of 76'. If that's apples-to-apples, then I'd feel better.
I just have this notion that recent Intel chips (particularly non-K) are super energy efficient and should be running cooler.
* https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/intel_core_i5_8600_processor_(65w)_review,5.html
During his normal (heavy gaming) usage, the CPU was registering > 90' regularly.
He has a large case with front intake fans, and a rear-top-side(GPU) exhaust fan.
The persistent > 90'C temps bugged me, so I purchased him a "beQuiet Shadow Rock 2" HSF from the local computer store.
The thing is massive.
We got it installed, and it immediately was > 90' -- he launched a game and it went over 100'.
OK - mistake found. I had mounted the backplate in the wrong orientation.
After rotating the backplate, his gaming temps are now in the low-mid 70's. Running the FurMark CPU stress test, he see's 82-83.
Does this seem to be "in the ballpark?"
It still seems too warm to me - it's a non-K chip in a large case with lots of airflow.
My only point of *reference is from a review where it looks like they used a water-cooler (?) and hit a max of 76'. If that's apples-to-apples, then I'd feel better.
I just have this notion that recent Intel chips (particularly non-K) are super energy efficient and should be running cooler.
* https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/intel_core_i5_8600_processor_(65w)_review,5.html