I would apreciate some more detailed answers that just "i5 3570k No contest here.. "
What are the downsides of using sucha cheapo MB with the i5? also I want to add that I never plan to use sli or xfire on any of the platforms and I also guess OC-ing on the Intel platform with such a weak MB would be a no no...
i5 3570k No contest here..
This.
You can get a decent board for $100 ($50 with a MC discount when buying the 3570k at the same time).
Sometimes I wonder if the people here know how to read at all, or if they get paid by the post for trolling.
From the links, i5-3570k + H61 board is ~1202 RON.
FX6300 + Asrock 970 extreme 3 is ~1010RON.
I'll give you a another choice for a better system:
FX6300(647 RON) + Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P (203 RON) + Mushkin Chronos 60GB SSD (320 RON) as boot drive for ~1170 RON. It is practically the same price as the i5, but it will truly run circles around the 3570, and I think that even the half brained fanboys will see it. The board is only SATA 2 and no USB 3.0, but it is very stable and solid.
Or, you can change the mobo to the MSI 870-C45 for 25 RON more, and get full ATX size and beefier components. Or, go to the kingston V200+ 120GB SSD.
Sometimes I wonder if the people here know how to read at all, or if they get paid by the post for trolling.
From the links, i5-3570k + H61 board is ~1202 RON.
FX6300 + Asrock 970 extreme 3 is ~1010RON.
I'll give you a another choice for a better system:
FX6300(647 RON) + Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P (203 RON) + Mushkin Chronos 60GB SSD (320 RON) as boot drive for ~1170 RON. It is practically the same price as the i5, but it will truly run circles around the 3570, and I think that even the half brained fanboys will see it. The board is only SATA 2 and no USB 3.0, but it is very stable and solid.
Or, you can change the mobo to the MSI 870-C45 for 25 RON more, and get full ATX size and beefier components. Or, go to the kingston V200+ 120GB SSD.
Are you saying that an FX-6300 "run circles" around a 3570k? Would you care to post a link to that? And if you are saying it will feel faster because of the SSD, that will not increase the framerate in gaming.
And yes, I agree, I really do wonder about the objectivity and motives of some of the posters on these forums. "cough, cough".
That system will indeed run circles around the i5 system.
Do you have a link to prove that it will not? Oh wait, maybe the the HDD gets supercharged because it gets "intel inside..."
The OP system will be used for MMOs and music production. While the i5 might have higher framerates in the MMOs (we don't even know what he will be playing) game experience might be similar (180fps i5 vs 130fps fx6300) But once he is done gaming, we all know that the SSD will make a tangible difference in everything else. Remember, it is a complete system
Fx 6300 Is slower then an i7 920.. and barely Faster then an i5 760 ....That system will indeed run circles around the i5 system.
Do you have a link to prove that it will not? Oh wait, maybe the the HDD gets supercharged because it gets "intel inside..."
The OP system will be used for MMOs and music production. While the i5 might have higher framerates in the MMOs (we don't even know what he will be playing) game experience might be similar (180fps i5 vs 130fps fx6300) But once he is done gaming, we all know that the SSD will make a tangible difference in everything else. Remember, it is a complete system
Fx 6300 Is slower then an i7 920.. and barely Faster then an i5 760 ....
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/699?vs=100
And look at it vs a 1090T =/ http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/699?vs=146
NO the FX6300 is not slower than Core i7 920, the correct link is bellow. Not to mention that Core i7 920 was a $300 CPU.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/699?vs=47
Looks slower to me..
OC that 920 to 3.5ghz should be a huge gap.