I've been eyeing the new Surface Pro i5-7300U model to be my new travel computer. Then I saw a photo in another forum of a dual-monitor setup using the Surface Pro with a docking station as a desktop configuration, and it piqued my interest.
My desktop computer is i3-6320 (3.9Ghz). Would the i5-7300U (with 3.5Ghz Turbo) be as fast (or faster)? i.e. Are there sufficient architecture improvements from Skylake to Kaby Lake to make the i5-7300U not be a downgrade? Do the "U" series Kaby Lake CPUs make any compromise in performance over higher power CPUs?
If the i5-7300U wouldn't be as good/fast as the i3-6320, what about an i7-7660U with 4.0Ghz Turbo? Do the extra 500Mhz and 64MB eDRAM make the Surface Pro i7 worth a $300 premium over the i5 in the context of using it as a desktop computer?
FYI, I don't do any gaming, just office applications, web browsing, watch videos and occasionally edit photos in Photoshop. My desktop computer has no discrete video card, just the Intel 530 IGP, and that has been adequate.
My desktop computer is i3-6320 (3.9Ghz). Would the i5-7300U (with 3.5Ghz Turbo) be as fast (or faster)? i.e. Are there sufficient architecture improvements from Skylake to Kaby Lake to make the i5-7300U not be a downgrade? Do the "U" series Kaby Lake CPUs make any compromise in performance over higher power CPUs?
If the i5-7300U wouldn't be as good/fast as the i3-6320, what about an i7-7660U with 4.0Ghz Turbo? Do the extra 500Mhz and 64MB eDRAM make the Surface Pro i7 worth a $300 premium over the i5 in the context of using it as a desktop computer?
FYI, I don't do any gaming, just office applications, web browsing, watch videos and occasionally edit photos in Photoshop. My desktop computer has no discrete video card, just the Intel 530 IGP, and that has been adequate.