Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
Originally posted by: tami
edit: your point is valid, but again, it's unethical. i wouldn't buy from a seller who had a history of duping his buyers because someone chose to pay more. in fact, i think such activities would cause consequences to the seller on AT if he chose to violate forum policy and go with the second offer.
I have to disagree with you a little here. I don't give dibs or rights to my product based on PMs or posts in my thread. As with most people here, if someone offers to buy your product, chances are it is NOT at your asking price. Thus if someone offers me lower than asking, and in the process of swapping PMs with that person another one offers my full asking price I damn well reserve the right to get my full asking price. Now if I'm discussing shipping addresses and the sale is all but done, I by no means will back out of the original sale. But if the original buyer and I are still swapping the first couple PM's discussing details and I get an offer for my full asking price, I will tell that buyer and ask them what they want to do about it. I will never attempt to "bid up" beyond my original asking price, but I don't see what is wrong with continuing to accept offers up to my asking price if the sale is not finalized.
EDIT In a similar situation, I was recently purchasing a video card. I found a good deal and had committed to the purchase, but there was about a week where I was waiting for him to be able to ship the product. In that time period, I found another deal that was better. I wanted to jump on it, but didn't.