apoppin
Lifer
I went to work and then the forums went down.
First of all, I don't need to explain anything to a ridiculer like cxim. He has contributed nothing but ridicule to this thread and has failed to say ANYTHING that supports his (lack of) views. However, some of the more reasonable members have asked where I got my info.
First of all - I have promoted vegetarianism as a healthy "alternative" to eating meat. My one example was the religion Buddhism - many of its members do not eat meat for reasons of karma. I pointed out that there are millions of people worldwide who have raised families for generations on a plant-based diet only without suffering ill effects. I challenge ANYONE to contradict this.
I was not speaking of the health of Indians living in abject poverty - as cxim claimed. Infact, despite their poverty they are over 1 billion people. Do you really need links to life-span comparisons of - say vegetarian Japanese with other meat eaters? Just do an internet search.
As to calcium absorbtion - I was pointing out the advantages of plant-based green foods over "rock" sources (or even milk). The best chart I can find is this one.
I can't find the absorbtion for Calcium carbonate but I remember it is rather low (much lower than milk) - in fact, many supplement manufactures chelate it so it can be better used by the body. Looking at the chart, however, we see milk's calcium about 32% absorbed and the calcium from many leafy greens about 50-75% absorbed. Significant? I think so.
This is just from a quick search. I was mostly quoting from memory. Not lying as cxim suggested. If anyone is really interested, I can look up more facts and figures. Now, I'd like to see cxim do a little research himself to support his own views. I am challenging him to back his own words up.
EDIT: cxim, if you swallow a rock and excrete it the next day, does that mean it was absorbed by your body? Your line of reasoning is so ridiculous as to need no answer.
First of all, I don't need to explain anything to a ridiculer like cxim. He has contributed nothing but ridicule to this thread and has failed to say ANYTHING that supports his (lack of) views. However, some of the more reasonable members have asked where I got my info.
First of all - I have promoted vegetarianism as a healthy "alternative" to eating meat. My one example was the religion Buddhism - many of its members do not eat meat for reasons of karma. I pointed out that there are millions of people worldwide who have raised families for generations on a plant-based diet only without suffering ill effects. I challenge ANYONE to contradict this.
I was not speaking of the health of Indians living in abject poverty - as cxim claimed. Infact, despite their poverty they are over 1 billion people. Do you really need links to life-span comparisons of - say vegetarian Japanese with other meat eaters? Just do an internet search.
As to calcium absorbtion - I was pointing out the advantages of plant-based green foods over "rock" sources (or even milk). The best chart I can find is this one.
I can't find the absorbtion for Calcium carbonate but I remember it is rather low (much lower than milk) - in fact, many supplement manufactures chelate it so it can be better used by the body. Looking at the chart, however, we see milk's calcium about 32% absorbed and the calcium from many leafy greens about 50-75% absorbed. Significant? I think so.
This is just from a quick search. I was mostly quoting from memory. Not lying as cxim suggested. If anyone is really interested, I can look up more facts and figures. Now, I'd like to see cxim do a little research himself to support his own views. I am challenging him to back his own words up.
EDIT: cxim, if you swallow a rock and excrete it the next day, does that mean it was absorbed by your body? Your line of reasoning is so ridiculous as to need no answer.
