I thought the Polls were supposed to tighten in the final days?

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Smart money is on Obama winning between 353 and 406 electoral votes.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: mizzou
no, 1/2 of undecideds don't vote at all.

You mean third party?

3rd party is more like 1-2% of the country. Right now undecided voters are 4-5%.
 

Farang

Lifer
Jul 7, 2003
10,913
3
0
lolz.. I caught the daylight savings glitch. My 10:02 post was at 11:02

edit: now I'm posting in the middle of the post.. its magic
 

aphex

Moderator<br>All Things Apple
Moderator
Jul 19, 2001
38,572
2
91
http://www.gallup.com/poll/111...bama-55-McCain-44.aspx

PRINCETON, NJ -- The final Gallup 2008 pre-election poll -- based on Oct. 31-Nov. 2 Gallup Poll Daily tracking -- shows Barack Obama with a 53% to 42% advantage over John McCain among likely voters. When undecided voters are allocated proportionately to the two candidates to better approximate the actual vote, the estimate becomes 55% for Obama to 44% for McCain.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
The campaign is over. A lot of the people who saw Bush snatch it in 2000 and 2004 and think that this is quantifiably the same situation will be in for a rude awakening tomorrow evening.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: mizzou
no, 1/2 of undecideds don't vote at all.

You mean third party?

3rd party is more like 1-2% of the country. Right now undecided voters are 4-5%.

people who vote 3rd party are already decided. Noone goes to the poles and votes for the guy noone has heard of.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Evan
Smart money is on Obama winning between 353 and 406 electoral votes.


lol, i'll take the under.

It's funny that you can't make snide remarks about how great McCain is and how he's going to win anymore, so now, like a 4 year old, you've found something new. "HA you dummy! My candidate won't lose by NEARLY as much as you think!!!"
 

TallBill

Lifer
Apr 29, 2001
46,017
62
91
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Evan
Smart money is on Obama winning between 353 and 406 electoral votes.


lol, i'll take the under.

It's funny that you can't make snide remarks about how great McCain is and how he's going to win anymore, so now, like a 4 year old, you've found something new. "HA you dummy! My candidate won't lose by NEARLY as much as you think!!!"

And it's funny to see the other 4 year old play too.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
The polls did tighten to a certain extent, but I dont think enough for McCain to squeak by.

If you look at the electoral map on real clear politics, several states that were leaning Obama are now too close to call...Ohio, Indiana, Virginia, Georgia, Montana, Missouri and Florida...neither McCain nor Obama are going into tomorrow with higher than a 4 point lead in any of those states, so they will be very close.

Colorado, Nevada, Pennsylvania and New Mexico will be interesting to watch...Obama has slid a point or two in each of those states in the last week...granted he still commands over a 4 point lead in those states, with PA being the greatest electoral prize...McCain needs to claim PA to win this thing, and Obama still has a commanding 7 point lead in PA.

So yes, the polls did tighten a few points...enough to perhaps close the electoral gap, but not enough for McCain to win.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Fivethirtyeight now puts McCain's chances at 1.9%. He's got em just where he wants em.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,592
6,715
126
Originally posted by: jonks
Fivethirtyeight now puts McCain's chances at 1.9%. He's got em just where he wants em.

I can do that. I know how to lose.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Evan
Smart money is on Obama winning between 353 and 406 electoral votes.


lol, i'll take the under.

It's funny that you can't make snide remarks about how great McCain is and how he's going to win anymore, so now, like a 4 year old, you've found something new. "HA you dummy! My candidate won't lose by NEARLY as much as you think!!!"

lol, you post might have merit if I ever supported McCain.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Evan
Smart money is on Obama winning between 353 and 406 electoral votes.


lol, i'll take the under.

It's funny that you can't make snide remarks about how great McCain is and how he's going to win anymore, so now, like a 4 year old, you've found something new. "HA you dummy! My candidate won't lose by NEARLY as much as you think!!!"

lol, you post might have merit if I ever supported McCain.
Who do you support?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,763
54,793
136
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Evan
Smart money is on Obama winning between 353 and 406 electoral votes.


lol, i'll take the under.

It's funny that you can't make snide remarks about how great McCain is and how he's going to win anymore, so now, like a 4 year old, you've found something new. "HA you dummy! My candidate won't lose by NEARLY as much as you think!!!"

lol, you post might have merit if I ever supported McCain.

Guys, just because CAD spends all his time on here attacking Obama doesn't mean he supports McCain. Like in a football game, just because I want the Giants to lose doesn't mean that I want their opponent to win! Maybe I'm rooting for some other wildly improbable scenario to occur. I could in fact be hoping for a meteor strike to destroy the stadium.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Evan
Smart money is on Obama winning between 353 and 406 electoral votes.


lol, i'll take the under.

It's funny that you can't make snide remarks about how great McCain is and how he's going to win anymore, so now, like a 4 year old, you've found something new. "HA you dummy! My candidate won't lose by NEARLY as much as you think!!!"

lol, you post might have merit if I ever supported McCain.
Who do you support?

Conservatives.

I'll likely vote Barr or write in RP2 as a protest tomorrow since the national choice is a RINO vs far left Liberal.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

I'll likely vote Barr or write in RP2 as a protest tomorrow since the national choice is a RINO vs far left Liberal.

Who/what is RP2 and RINO?
 

TheSlamma

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
7,625
5
81
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Evan
Smart money is on Obama winning between 353 and 406 electoral votes.


lol, i'll take the under.

It's funny that you can't make snide remarks about how great McCain is and how he's going to win anymore, so now, like a 4 year old, you've found something new. "HA you dummy! My candidate won't lose by NEARLY as much as you think!!!"

lol, you post might have merit if I ever supported McCain.
Who do you support?

Conservatives.
Maybe you can tell me then.. since Conservatives are the worst motherfuckers on the planet with money, what is it they are conservative about?