I think the end game for patents is upon us...

Discussion in 'Mobile Devices & Gadgets' started by Pliablemoose, Feb 11, 2012.

  1. Pliablemoose

    Pliablemoose Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 1999
    Messages:
    25,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2012/02/apple-requests-us-preliminary.html

    Should be interesting.
     
  2. foghorn67

    foghorn67 Lifer

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    11,616
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't think I'll be reading foss for that.
     
  3. alent1234

    alent1234 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2002
    Messages:
    3,915
    Likes Received:
    0
    So Samsung only has to show they implemented their features in a different way with different algorithms than apple did
     
  4. postmortemIA

    postmortemIA Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    7,510
    Likes Received:
    2
    pattens for solutions to common problems should be banned.
     
  5. swanysto

    swanysto Golden Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,884
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yay! Let's fatten the pockets of our poor lawyers.
     
  6. Phynaz

    Phynaz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    8,844
    Likes Received:
    38
    Why?
     
  7. podspi

    podspi Golden Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,880
    Likes Received:
    1
    Algorithms should be patentable, general solutions to problems should not.

    Ex: Text prediction should not be patentable. A specific algorithm for text prediction should.

    Slide-to-unlock should not be something that is patentable, imho.
     
  8. soccerballtux

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    12,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    algorithms aren't patentable
     
  9. Bateluer

    Bateluer Lifer

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2001
    Messages:
    27,733
    Likes Received:
    1
    They seem to be.

    Also, rectangles, specific colors, pictures(any) on a screen are patentable. So sayeth the Mighty Apple.
     
  10. Puddle Jumper

    Puddle Jumper Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,835
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not sure if the other patents are as worthless as the slide to unlock one but at least in that case there is plenty of prior art available that should make it easy to have the patent invalidated.

    If Apple is successful in this lawsuit I hope it pisses oiff enough people that way start to see some serious malware targeting OSX and iOS.
     
  11. Pliablemoose

    Pliablemoose Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 1999
    Messages:
    25,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Meh, don't hate the player, hate the game :cool:

    The first patent has already been used successfully against HTC, it's likely a slam dunk, the others are new and unproven.

    This one directly targets ICS and the GN, and asks for injunctive relief.

    I do find it interesting that Apple has continued with the patent war since the passing of Jobs, I have had this sneaking suspicion that Cook made a deathbed promise to Jobs that he'd carry on the fight. Cook seems pragmatic enough to not push some of these patents, I think he's keeping his promise to a dying Steve Jobs. If that's the case we won't know about it for a long time.
     
  12. notposting

    notposting Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2005
    Messages:
    3,465
    Likes Received:
    0
    I just think the most interesting aspect is that thus far Apple seems to have no interest in tangling with MS again...wonder if that will change if WP7/8 ever gets going. Even though things like the phone number or the text prediction could probably carry over.
     
  13. soccerballtux

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    12,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know, but they're not patentable. What they're getting away with is a patent on a specific method of doing something. For example, 20 mathematical algorithms applied to music decoding would be patentable, but the cosign transform function itself wouldn't be. An ultra-efficient means of performing a transform might be patentable.
     
  14. Patranus

    Patranus Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    9,284
    Likes Received:
    0
    To be fair, I don't think that the CEO of MS was on their board of directors pillaging their intellectual property.
     
  15. Puddle Jumper

    Puddle Jumper Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,835
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think Apple will ever try this approach against Microsoft since it's not a fight they would be guaranteed to win. All Microsoft would need to do is find that Apple is infringing on a couple of key operating system related patents and they could completely destroy Apple's current sucess.

    I do agree with Pliablemoose that it's interesting that Cook has continued this. I expected him to focus on going after Google by making better products rather than try to win in court.
     
    #15 Puddle Jumper, Feb 11, 2012
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2012
  16. smartpatrol

    smartpatrol Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2006
    Messages:
    870
    Likes Received:
    0
    It seems that MS has a very powerful patent portfolio. It's strong enough that nearly every Android OEM pays them protection money. They also offer indemnification to their handset partners, so Apple would have to sue MS themselves rather than the OEMs.

    Apple going after MS would be mutually assured destruction.
     
  17. Pliablemoose

    Pliablemoose Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 1999
    Messages:
    25,198
    Likes Received:
    0
  18. hans007

    hans007 Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2000
    Messages:
    20,105
    Likes Received:
    1
    i hope steve jobs feels warm in hell because this patent fight he started with all these ridiculous design patents just makes me angry in general.
     
  19. annomander

    annomander Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    0
    Apple and Microsoft had a patent sharing pact in place.
     
  20. annomander

    annomander Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    0
    You know, repeating it time and time again doesn't make it right, its just as wrong as the first time you said it, but I think you know that already, just makes you look a bit daft.
     
  21. annomander

    annomander Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    0
    Besides the agreement in placce, you don't think Apple has as many Operating system related patents as Microsoft.
     
  22. Fire&Blood

    Fire&Blood Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,231
    Likes Received:
    1
    Apple is doing this because xerox didn't, Apple is doing this because the pre 2007 mobile players didn't. Instead, touch screen interactions, accelerometer and countless other functions were left wide open for Apple to cherry pick and claim as their own.

    Ultimately the consumers will suffer, even the ones approving of the patent war though they may not realize that just yet. Launching nukes at Asian OEM's, as appealing as it may be to some won't do the consumer any good.
     
  23. Puddle Jumper

    Puddle Jumper Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,835
    Likes Received:
    0
    If that is true I am amazed the EU or FTC hasn't nailed them for it since it's the definition of anti competitive behavior.
     
  24. Pliablemoose

    Pliablemoose Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 1999
    Messages:
    25,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's called cross licensing, and it's the way technology patents work, there are a gazillion patents, if you want to use it, you license it or enter into a sharing agreement.
     
  25. Brian Stirling

    Brian Stirling Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    4,001
    Likes Received:
    0

    Bingo!


    Apple and M$ both borrowed heavily from Xerox and now that Apple is in the mobile space they want everyone else to get out or refrain from making smart phones and tablets. If Apple is successful at getting ownership of rounded rectangular slabs and the other patents designed to box in/out the competition we the customer will pay a heavy price.

    But these legal wars worry me beyond the mobile space as this legal practice, if successful, could be taken up by many companies in many industries and that could cost us 100's of billions, even trillions and 10's or even 100's of millions of jobs.


    Brian