You do get that we are discussing a nation where welfare for these kids and their mothers is non-existant, right? A nation where pretty much everyone in poverty is in a gang, right? It can be proud boys or Hells Angels or some small gang but they'll be in a gang or they will starve to death.It's not obvious to me, because it very clearly depends on the nature of that society that one is born into. I don't see why that isn't obvious to you, in fact. I also don't see why you presume that 'unwanted' equates to 'being born into poverty'. Nor do I see any reason for you to get so insanely aggressive and abusive about that point (unless you've ingested too much lead, perhaps?). And why the leap to 'being in a gang', as if criminal gangs are some sort of universal thing, and not a product of particular societies.
I'm just reading what the twat said and he's wrong, obviously so and he CHOSE to misinterpret it as "more kids more crime" which was quite obviously not the point Amused made, that pissed me off a bit because Amused explained it and he STILL did it.