Originally posted by: Jellomancer
I'm so glad I live in Austin now... people with your attitude (whether you are serious or not...) pissed me off. My brother and his wife got a Suburban to have enough room for a family of 4, as do alot of people in Houston. They actually believe that "bigger is better" crap. The ignorance and susceptability to fashion is overwhelming.
Don't get me wrong, "bigger" is not always better...
Given a choice, I'd rather be in a Volvo crashing into another Volvo...
But since I don't have that choice, I do NOT want to be in a Volvo and have a Suburban crash into me. Mass matters, and you cannot design a 2,000lb car well enough to make a difference when a 6,000lb truck comes crashing into it.
Suburbans are not nearly as crashworthy as many cars are, in single vehicle wrecks they do worse than cars. But in multi-vehicle wrecks, they far surpass cars for survivability. This is why people buy them.
So the question is, am I more likely to crash myself, or crash into someone/have them crash into me? Since I'm a good driver and have never been in a wreck, I feel the latter is more likely to occour, so I drive a tank.
For what it's worth, I've seen a lot of Suburban/other car accidents on the road, including one that occoured right in front of me. A Ford Taurus was trying to beat the red light, a Suburban drove through the intercetion and broadsided it. You would have been hardpressed to tell it was once a Ford Taurus, but the Suburban was surprisingly intact after that wreck. The driver in the Taurus was Careflighted to the hospital (never did find out what happened to him), the Suburban driver walked away with only a few brusies.
Mass counts...
Grasshopper