I support discriminating against interracial sex.

[Orsorum]

It's immoral, it's something that God never intended. That's why he put all the races on different continents. It's unclean and promotes an unhealthy lifestyle.

Did you know that interracial couples are more likely to live in poverty? Or that one of the spouses is more likely to commit suicide? That their union is unsanitary?

Share your thoughts, preferably with bible verses as justification. This is a Christian nation, after all, and our law is based on Christian morals only.

 

[Zephyr106]

Originally posted by: Orsorum
It's immoral, it's something that God never intended. That's why he put all the races on different continents. It's unclean and promotes an unhealthy lifestyle.

Did you know that interracial couples are more likely to live in poverty? Or that one of the spouses is more likely to commit suicide? That their union is unsanitary?

Share your thoughts, preferably with bible verses as justification. This is a Christian nation, after all, and our law is based on Christian morals only.

My thoughts exactly. Not to mention that the different races are physically, mentally, and morally incompatible as well. America's White Christian Culture is under assault from "brown people". It's time for our Godly politicians to put the religion back in politics, no matter what that liberal, revisionist, minority-loving Constitution says.

Zephyr

 

[chess9]

Hear, hear, you gentleman are absolutely correct. Marry a black? Good grief? Heaven forfend? Here, in America?

Just think, if we just put them back in shackles for a few hundred years we'd have some really great books by Kyle Onstott, or his successor, to read.
-Robert

 

[DealMonkey]

Allowing blacks and whites to marry and/or have sex, will only lead to polygamy, bestiality, necrophilia, inbreeding and of course homosexuality to be considered valid lifestyle choices in America.

Bob Jones University almost had it right ...

Does the University believe that those who choose interracial marriage do so out of rebellion against God? No. It does believe, however, that often the promoters of it do so out of antagonism toward God because they are often the same entities that promote homosexuality, abortion, and other forms of social radicalism.

Bob Jones University's policy regarding interracial dating was more of an opposition to the rebellious and defiant antichrist spirit of the promoters of one-worldism than to interracial dating itself. Many who date and marry interracially are just as opposed to one-worldism and the spirit of Antichrist as we are.

 

[Zephyr106]

Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Allowing blacks and whites to marry and/or have sex, will only lead to polygamy, bestiality, necrophilia, inbreeding and of course homosexuality to be considered valid lifestyle choices in America.

Bob Jones University almost had it right ...

Many who date and marry interracially are just as opposed to one-worldism and the spirit of Antichrist as we are.

Yes, very true Bob Jones University, some of those darkies are "good ones", Uncle Toms, like Colin Powell, and can sometimes be trusted with our white women.

Zephyr

 

[nutxo]

wow

lot of trolling/baiting threads today

 

[LordMagnusKain]

Obviously you lack any intelligent response so straw-men and red-hearing fallacies are all you can come up with.

It's sad that you use such lies to yourself to make yourself feel more self-righteous.

/feed troll cookie.

 

[Zephyr106]

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
Obviously you lack any intelligent response so straw-men and red-hearing fallacies are all you can come up with.

It's sad that you use such lies to yourself to make yourself feel more self-righteous.

/feed troll cookie.

I do not need to feel righteous. I am well aware that I am a fallen sinner, but will be saved by the grace of God for living a Godly life. I think it is you that has insecurities regarding righteousness. Tell me sinner, have you been saved by Jesus?

Zephyr

 

[Romans828]

Ok I will take the bait...........

Interracial marriage is absolutely fine (assuming its one man/one woman). The BIBLE CLEARLY teaches ALL PEOPLE are equal in the eyes of God and that all people who believe in the Lord Jesus christ are brothers and sisters unto Christ.

Love should never see "color" in any way shape or form.... Love between friends, families, husband and wife should always be color blind.

People who USED (read abused) the Bible to imply God scattered the people to suppress inter race relations are among the worst sort of sinner. They take things out of context just to suit their hurtful purposes. There is no excuse for that.

The Bible is a very complex book, and one must read it very carefully, devoting much time in study to maintain its spirit and context when applying its principles to matters of life.

 

[TheBDB]

The BIBLE CLEARLY teaches ALL PEOPLE are equal in the eyes of God

So you are designating homosexuals non-people because you obviously don't believe they are equal?

 

[Romans828]

Originally posted by: Zephyr106

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
Obviously you lack any intelligent response so straw-men and red-hearing fallacies are all you can come up with.

It's sad that you use such lies to yourself to make yourself feel more self-righteous.

/feed troll cookie.

I do not need to feel righteous. I am well aware that I am a fallen sinner, but will be saved by the grace of God for living a Godly life. I think it is you that has insecurities regarding righteousness. Tell me sinner, have you been saved by Jesus?

Zephyr

Yes I have been saved by Jesus thanks for asking.........

You however cannot be saved by "living a Godly life" its not possible. Read the Book its very clear on that :Q

 

[Moonbeam]

I'm opposed to interracial marriage because it's a form of incest. All people living out of Africa are related to the people there within the last two hundred thousand years. That is like what, third cousins? Disgusting. And wrong. Because it's wrong and disgusting, of course.

Sing along now!

 

[Romans828]

Originally posted by: TheBDB

The BIBLE CLEARLY teaches ALL PEOPLE are equal in the eyes of God

So you are designating homosexuals non-people because you obviously don't believe they are equal?

Of course not they are absolutely equal. I NEVER STATED otherwise. They are however engaged in open sin and need to repent and seek forgiveness.

We ARE ALL SINNERS and WE ARE ALL EQUAL. A homosexual is no worse than a thief, or adultry, or lying or whatever else. Sin is sin to God, Bible makes that quite clear.

 

[LordMagnusKain]

and not one of us is without sin;

now romans, let's not feed the trolls trying to destract that a good number of them are for man-boy sex.

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
and not one of us is without sin;

now romans, let's not feed the trolls trying to destract that a good number of them are for man-boy sex.

Who here is for man-boy sex?

 

[TheBDB]

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
and not one of us is without sin;

now romans, let's not feed the trolls trying to destract that a good number of them are for man-boy sex.

I didn't know we had any Catholic priests here...

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
and not one of us is without sin;

now romans, let's not feed the trolls trying to destract that a good number of them are for man-boy sex.

Who here is for man-boy sex?

MagnusKain?

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
and not one of us is without sin;

now romans, let's not feed the trolls trying to destract that a good number of them are for man-boy sex.

Who here is for man-boy sex?

It seems to have been on LordMagnusKain's mind.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
and not one of us is without sin;

now romans, let's not feed the trolls trying to destract that a good number of them are for man-boy sex.

Who here is for man-boy sex?

It seems to have been on LordMagnusKain's mind.

That along with incest and necraphilia. Funny that he should mention them time and time again when it never crosses the minds of normal people!

 

[LordMagnusKain]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
and not one of us is without sin;

now romans, let's not feed the trolls trying to destruct that a good number of them are for man-boy sex.

Who here is for man-boy sex?

MagnusKain?

read the other thread, as many traditionalists as 'age doesn't even matter' as long as their is consent;

i agree with you red, that when it comes to jail time 'informed' consent should be the rule, and those who in gage in sex with underage children shouldn't be free to molest others.

But if you read some of those in the other thread you'll find they are more than likely NAMBLA members.

reasonable people like yourself few and far-between red;

Funny that he should mention them time and time again when it never crosses the minds of normal people!

could be, but some 30% of the vote on the other thread are A-OK with it.

you can be for homosexual marriage and not be for incest; but it looks very un-likely that such is going to be the eventual goal of those driving to re-define marriage in this instance.

Who here is for man-boy sex?

the 20 or so people who voted 'yes' when it came to 'marriage should be between the consenting', with dis-regard of age, not to mention dis-regard to relationship and number of people.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
and not one of us is without sin;

now romans, let's not feed the trolls trying to destruct that a good number of them are for man-boy sex.

Who here is for man-boy sex?

MagnusKain?

read the other thread, as many traditionalists as 'age doesn't even matter' as long as their is consent;

i agree with you red, that when it comes to jail time 'informed' consent should be the rule, and those who in gage in sex with underage children shouldn't be free to molest others.

But if you read some of those in the other thread you'll find they are more than likely NAMBLA members.

reasonable people like yourself few and far-between red;

Funny that he should mention them time and time again when it never crosses the minds of normal people!

could be, but some 30% of the vote on the other thread are A-OK with it.

you can be for homosexual marriage and not be for incest; but it looks very un-likely that such is going to be the eventual goal of those driving to re-define marriage in this instance.

And you wonder why people here make fun of you? Trust me, it's not because you are a Christian, it's because you are an extremist. I seriously doubt that anybody here is a member or supporter of NAMBLA. In fact I'm eilling to bet that most who you are arguing with find Homosexual sex between men disgusting. Of course Gay sex between good looking women is another thing

 

[PlatinumGold]

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
Obviously you lack any intelligent response so straw-men and red-hearing fallacies are all you can come up with.

It's sad that you use such lies to yourself to make yourself feel more self-righteous.

/feed troll cookie.

WTF is a red hearing fallacy???

is this some kind of knock against our native american friends??

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
and not one of us is without sin;

now romans, let's not feed the trolls trying to destract that a good number of them are for man-boy sex.

Who here is for man-boy sex?

It seems to have been on LordMagnusKain's mind.

That along with incest and necraphilia. Funny that he should mention them time and time again when it never crosses the minds of normal people!

Yeah, I noticed. All of those compulsive thoughts aren't surfacing from his unconscience for no reason..

 

[chess9]

Moonbeam:

It's guilt. Yep, too much wacking off has him worried he's going to Hell.

You DID check his palms before you let him in, right?

-Robert

 

[Red Dawn]

Well maybe we should give Mag a break. He's a fairly new Born Again and those guys usually tend to go a bit overboard trying to convince others that they have made the right decision..if just to convince themselves they did. I bet when he feels more comfortable with his beliefs he'll stop being such a pain in the ass