palehorse
Lifer
- Dec 21, 2005
- 11,521
- 0
- 76
Two questions:Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: palehorse74
not in Iraq.Originally posted by: Aimster
funding government officials is different than arming insurgents.
There is no evidence Iran is doing anything with the insurgency.
1) Is it your contention that Iran has no involvement in the insurgency, or that there is simply no evidence of their involvement?
Please clarify.
2) Second, if you were presented with undeniable proof of Iran's direct involvement in the insurgency, including the provision of weapons and training, would you condemn Iran for it? Or would you somehow justify or excuse their involvement?