You got me interested. How much is an octo-AM3+ processor? I was on track to build something else. See-E. I'm really trying to put it off and schedule it for 2015. And I DON'T know what I'm going to do with that many cores.
Could you be a government contractor to NSA? Nah-- they've got supercopmputers with hundreds of iNtels or AMDs. Hmmm.
Seti@Home?
heh I'm not willing to test whether running Windows Update was the problem as there's no going back!
it's possible with old CPU and MOBO if I had just reformatted everything would be just as fast. Personally, I think it was some combination of Windows Update, AMD leftover bits all over the place from Radeon video card driver updates (in the future, I will always uninstall, reboot, install); and Chrome having bloated in the last 2 years necessitating 16GB of RAM (previously, 8GB was fine). Oh, and keeping my swap file disabled makes everything super fast. I don't know why but even with 13GB free Windows will still swap unused in the last couple days programs entirely to disk, rendering the RAM useless. Anyways I was getting some weird stuff like super laggy Windows Explorer delays when entering/rendering a new folder. Didn't used to be that way. And when I switched from NVidia to AMD I immediately started having OOM errors at 5.5->6GB RAM usage; before on NVidia I used to be able to bump right up next to 8GB without a problem. Windows Update changed vmem allocation algos somewhere? AMD drivers? I'm not willing to find out, but installing VS2010 will probably make at least some updates mandatory.
I think I might have managed to figure out the turbo on this processor and Overdrive. AMD Overdrive is a really buggy mess. Disabled most features just made sure Turbo was enabled. That didn't help too much, but using AMDMsrTweaker to turn off APM and turn it back on from within Windows seems to have been what everything needed. I'm not sure why, I chalk it up to the shoddy mid-tier Asus BIOS (they actually go to the trouble of having different codebases for their product tiers, direct words out of friend's mouth when discussing this last night with him, he's a UEFI dev at AMI).
I paid $75+S/H/Tax for my FX-8310, 95w TDP is nice and cool, stock 3.4ghz but now that Turbo's working correctly bounces up to
actually, no, it's not correctly working; so I'll have to Task-Schedule P-State Pb1 to bet set to 21.5x@1.4125v on resume from suspend. Thanks Asus. It's a shame, Pb1 is 3.7ghz and Pb0 is 4.3ghz, but the ONLY way to consistently get it to boost to 4.3ghz is run the Windows Experience Index performance evaluation tool, and then it only does that when the CPU is being stressed. Go figure. I'm pretty sure this is a BIOS issue with Turbo or APM implementation; I'm going to see if I can't make Asus file a bug report for me so they can BIOS rev. I have to decide whether I want it to turbo to 3.7ghz or 4.3ghz (can't choose both).
Anyways I paid $75 + S/H/Tax which is about what I made from Ebay selling the FX-6300 I got in a mobo-combo bought from MicroCenter a day before TigerDirect had a Paypal $25 off $100 thing.
It's...fast for the money. I can't believe people in General Hardware were saying it doesn't make sense to go with AM3+ being a dead platform. AMD is a dead company, there will not be any more non-APU chips with the performance that CrapPileShoveller and Dulldozer have for at least a long time. I average 210FPS encoding with the linked, non-recent-nightly-build Handbrake from
this thread. Intel spammers were regularly recommending I jump to a cheap Intel mobo; the cheapest CPU (i3-530) was a $110 dual core that
even if overclocked to 4.5ghz would only get me about 120FPS in handbrake, which .
is what I was getting on my old Ph2-965 4.0ghz@2.6ghz CPU-NB. IE, it would have been a complete sidegrade. I just don't get how people can be so evil like that. I've only seen it from Intel and NVidia fanbois.