Do you remember where you read that dynamic TrueCrypt containers have less security, and why that is? If you can find the source, I'd appreciate it.
Based on my limited searching, it used to be because it was easier to tell that the dynamic volumes contained encrypted data - but that's about it. However, there are tools that can detect the possibility of encrypted data for even static TrueCrypt containers (FI Tools and TC Hunt)... though they do give some false positives... so if that's all it doesn't seem to be a huge deal (because the other way isn't perfect either).
As far as I know, then, unless there's something else at play here - there may be no compelling reason that dynamic volumes are that much less secure, so I would still recommend a dynamic TrueCrypt volume or even an EFS-protected folder (for Windows) if you really need a dynamic container. You may also be able to just create the volume to be larger than you anticipate you will need, if you are worried about security.