- May 18, 2001
- 7,884
- 382
- 126
...before I consult my real lawyer. I don't want to have to pay his hourly consultation fee unless I feel I actually have reason to.
I've been helping my elderly parents fix some financial mistakes they have made. They are naïve country people, and grew up in a time when you could trust anyone. As a result, they've made some stupid decisions...
There are 2 different situations, both of which happened several years ago (probably within the past 10 years).
1. My dad loaned his boss $10k but never got a penny of it back. He says that they drew up and signed an agreement, which Dad still has. The agreement was that the loan amount plus interest would be repaid. The loan was to help out the business where my dad worked, which has since gone into bankruptcy. I haven't seen this written agreement, but I suspect that the loan was made directly to Dad's old boss, and not to the business itself.
2. Several years ago my dad hired a company to put a new roof on his house & do some related work. They royally botched the job. Dad decided to take them to civil court. He represented himself... and actually won the case. The judgement was for a significant amount of money, which the defendant never paid. I'm not clear if it was Dad's responsibility to actually collect the cash, but if so he never kicked off that process - I think he assumed that the court would handle the collection.
Does he have any course of action in either situation? Does a statute of limitations apply in either one?
I've been helping my elderly parents fix some financial mistakes they have made. They are naïve country people, and grew up in a time when you could trust anyone. As a result, they've made some stupid decisions...
There are 2 different situations, both of which happened several years ago (probably within the past 10 years).
1. My dad loaned his boss $10k but never got a penny of it back. He says that they drew up and signed an agreement, which Dad still has. The agreement was that the loan amount plus interest would be repaid. The loan was to help out the business where my dad worked, which has since gone into bankruptcy. I haven't seen this written agreement, but I suspect that the loan was made directly to Dad's old boss, and not to the business itself.
2. Several years ago my dad hired a company to put a new roof on his house & do some related work. They royally botched the job. Dad decided to take them to civil court. He represented himself... and actually won the case. The judgement was for a significant amount of money, which the defendant never paid. I'm not clear if it was Dad's responsibility to actually collect the cash, but if so he never kicked off that process - I think he assumed that the court would handle the collection.
Does he have any course of action in either situation? Does a statute of limitations apply in either one?
