Vic
Elite Member
- Jun 12, 2001
- 50,422
- 14,333
- 136
That's not going to happen. Period. Get over it and start considering more realistic ways to address this issue.Anchor babies. Gotta love them.
Looks like we need a Constitutional Amendment.
That's not going to happen. Period. Get over it and start considering more realistic ways to address this issue.Anchor babies. Gotta love them.
Looks like we need a Constitutional Amendment.
Teaching in grade school "Columbus discovered America" is de-facto condoning.
aren't all "americans" technically illegal?
Did the native americans allow us to stay?
Tell that to young americans who can't get a job.That's not going to happen. Period. Get over it and start considering more realistic ways to address this issue.
That's not going to happen. Period. Get over it and start considering more realistic ways to address this issue.
I just realized there are a few paths.
1) Trump gets the R nomination
This will result in:
1a) He looses
1b) He wins and gets assassinated
OR
2) Trump gets no R nomination
Then:
2a) He enters election ass Independant. Takes enough R votes to let the D party win. Then he definitely gets the R nomination for 2018.
Trump has the R party by the balls! (1b is somewhat sarcastic). He basically has it so the R party has to nominate him or the R party will loose no matter what type of situation. That's why all the other Rs are desperate to steer the conversation away from Trump.
Why is there no 1c, where he wins and does not get assassinated?
From what I read, many prominent judges and legal scholars do not think it'd require an amendment. It could be challenged by the USC, but overall it seems like it could be done.
Hell, even Harry Reid pushed for it in the 90s. Wonder if somebody punched him so hard then that he almost lost an eye, and changed his mind. Forcefully.
Yes, they did break the law. But you're going to have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law for each and every single one of them individually.
The 'deport them all' rhetoric is unrealistic. We can't just round up every one who looks like an illegal and ship them south.
1b) He wins and gets assassinated
Tell that to young americans who can't get a job.
That's not going to happen. Period. Get over it and start considering more realistic ways to address this issue.
From what I read, many prominent judges and legal scholars do not think it'd require an amendment. It could be challenged by the USC, but overall it seems like it could be done.
Hell, even Harry Reid pushed for it in the 90s. Wonder if somebody punched him so hard then that he almost lost an eye, and changed his mind. Forcefully.
Even if congress managed to pass a law covering this (extremely doubtful) a federal court would issue an immediate injunction preventing it from going into effect while the case is fought out. Given precedent and the current makeup of the Supreme Court the law would certainly be found to be unconstitutional. Not to mention that the mechanisms to actually enforce his plan would run up against multiple other parts of the constitution and existing US law. It would be so mired in different, well founded, legal challenges that it would effectively never happen.
The idea that his "program" can be accomplished with anything short of an amendment is so wildly optimistic that it's essentially delusional.
Also, if you actually learned something, graduated, acquired skills and you do not get a job..it's not because of illegals.
Illegals don't get hired as software programmers, doctors or ANY "higher level" job. Illegals are usually in the lowest paying "helper" jobs, factory workers etc. where they often get paid less than mix. wage under the table.
So if you're a graduate or have any acquired skills and actual qualification in a field and you blame illegals that they took your job you're fool too. You just prove you know NOTHING about economics and what is really going on.
Gotta love some twat like you pretending you know economics.My deepest sympathies to the those with a small mind who think that it's illegal immigrants who are "stealing our jobs".
Bow to your master Donald Trump with his glorious idea to build a wall between Mexico and Texas.
And let's just ignore that WAY more jobs are gone because of entirely legal off-shoring and manufacturing in 3rld world countries.
Obviously, my explanation that Trump doesn't address this REAL issue is that he can't.
Because as a republican and conservative he CAN NOT address the problem of offshoring and outsourcing, because any limitation/penalization etc. would mean imposing limits for companies. And of course this contradicts what conservatives stand for. Can you see a conservative who would tell businesses and corporates that he'd be making a law to tax ALL companies who outsource (to cut costs --> more profits), say 25% or 30%? Lol..because I can'tBut here is a tip: You can do whatever you want, build a 100ft wall and give yourself to the illusion...jobs are still getting lost and your car is still being made in Mexico and your clothes in China because companies will off-shore and out-manufacture with a wall in Texas or without.
And you fools happily keep believing in how Jose from Tijuana steals your jobs....I just keep laughing.
Also, if you actually learned something, graduated, acquired skills and you do not get a job..it's not because of illegals.
Illegals don't get hired as software programmers, doctors or ANY "higher level" job. Illegals are usually in the lowest paying "helper" jobs, factory workers etc. where they often get paid less than mix. wage under the table.
So if you're a graduate or have any acquired skills and actual qualification in a field and you blame illegals that they took your job you're fool too. You just prove you know NOTHING about economics and what is really going on.
Immigration is a great thing. As long as it is rational and controlled as not to flood a job market and put American jobs at significant risk. All countries have found that legal immigration of educated and hard working people benefits innovation.I actually think immigration is good for the long term demographics of the country. We don't want to become like Japan. And considering the declining birthrate in developed nations immigration is actually a good thing for the long term. Yes it drains our resources initially. But eventually they will be contributing.
Gotta love some twat like you pretending you know economics.
Let me ask you this - how does Vietnam, Indonesia, China and many other countries get to be cheaper than the us constsntly, regardless of the buildup in foreign currency reserves of a specific trading partner with long running trade deficits?
Why, a manipulated currency of course. That and non reciprocal trade agreements that do not allow free flow of trade.
Go read up some more about economics and international trade before you blather on about something you have no fucking clue about.
Illegals take lower skilled jobs. Jobs that go to lower skilled people, young kids, and young adults. Unemployment in those groups sucks. Why? Because illegals.
Ask any contractor who doesn't hire illegals what it has done to their business. Roofers, plumbers, eletricians, drywallers, deck builders, landscapers. All fucked.
14% of California construction workers are illegals.
Nobody that is legal wants to become a drywaller or construction worker, eh?
Well now you really don't know that, do you?China isn't really relevant to this discussion right now as it's currency is overvalued, not undervalued.
Well now you really don't know that, do you?
You have no basis for that, nobody does. You cant account for foreign currency reserves, inflows (or outflows) or a number of other factors to say where it would be vs various other currencies, including the dollar, at any given point in time. Furthermore, even if the currency were to depreciate today, it likely would appreciate it the future when we need it to, but will still have no process in place to deal with them. The damage has largely been done and people like you are happy to let it keep going.It is extremely likely that in the current situation if the Chinese government were to allow the renminbi to float it would decline in value. On the issue of China's currency like most other things, Trump was babbling about something he's clueless about.
I guess that's sort of his thing though, haha.
You have no basis for that, nobody does. You cant account for foreign currency reserves, inflows (or outflows) or a number of other factors to say where it would be vs various other currencies, including the dollar, at any given point in time.
Furthermore, even if the currency were to depreciate today, it likely would appreciate it the future when we need it to, but will still have no process in place to deal with them. The damage has largely been done and people like you are happy to let it keep going.
Like most thins you say, you ignore multiple factors and the long term effect of currency arbitrage.
Funny how you care more about illegals and communist China than you do about your own countrymen.
