I know win2k was better for overclocking, but how 'bout XP

[azdevil]

I just ordered my winXP, I am currently using 98se, I was using a roomates 2000 pro. I noticed that I was able to overclock with more stability with win2k than I am with 98se. I was told that it was a few factors, but mostly due to the win2k's use of the NT kernal (over my head still, but learning fast). Anyone know if the XP is as good as or better for overclocking than win2k. I haven't seen any articles an overclocking with various operating systems, sounds like an interesting theory. This could all just be in my specific case and an anomoly. I thought it would make for some interesting discussion.

Basically does anyone know what bearing an os (any Win or even Linux) has on oc'ing?
Thanks

 

[CTho9305]

XP, 2k, and linux are all equally OC'able, since they cool the cpu while it is idle.
HOWEVER, it is VERY IMPORTANT that you understand that in reality, the OS does not affect oc'ability. basically, they are stable b/c they cool you cpu while its not in use. but if you start playing a game, the stability goes away. do OC'ing testing under win9x, or linux booted with the "nohlt" option to make sure you're not just past the border.

 

[grunjee]

I guess everyone has their own opinion...

In my experience, 98 is the best oc OS. Win2k is awesome all-around, but also very finicky. Meaning, you do the slightest thing it doesn't like, and it won't run.

Just my two cents.