• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I just got back from seeing Farenheit 9/11

It was a pretty good movie. I'm pretty liberal, but i'd have to say about 40 percent of the film was fluff (images, sound clips, videos..etc), and semantics/rhetoric. I'd say the rest of it was very enlighting to me.
 
Warning: Fahrenheit 9/11 is not for anyone under the age of 10.
Click to expand...

That's probably why you are sick FFMCobalt. Your childish nature couldn't handle it.

And by the way, it's "Fahrenheit", not "Farenheit". Thank you for correcting your mistake.
 
Originally posted by: Isshinryu
http://bowlingfortruth.com/
Click to expand...

The main points that no website wil be able to counter:

i) Iraq has not WMD's.
ii) Iraq had no links with Al Qaeda.
iii) The coalition does suck, look at the coalition that was formed in the Gulf War or the countries that supported the attack on Afghanistan.
iv) Another commonly used excuse is that Iraq massacred thousands of civilians with chemical weapons. Interestingly, the US supplied Iraq with all those weapons.

I, for one, did not care for the rest of the movie and thought it was ok. If MM had concentrated on the Iraq war instead of going all over the place, that movie would have shaken America up.
 
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: Isshinryu
http://bowlingfortruth.com/
Click to expand...

Perfect. I've been looking for something to read. Thank you.
Click to expand...

UPDATE 2: Anyone who disputes me is a goober. Yeah, I mean you, goober.

If you still don't believe in my fact-checking ability, just see all the great facts I compiled on Michael Moore here.

UPDATE 3: Best of the Web points out, that, if you adjust for inflation, Jackass: The Movie ties Fahrenheit 9/11 for its opening take. That makes me extra-super-right about everything and all who doubts me that much more of a goober.

Whether Fahrenheit 9/11 will have the long lasting political effects of Jackass is yet to be seen.
Click to expand...

:laugh:
 
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Originally posted by: Isshinryu
http://bowlingfortruth.com/
Click to expand...

The main points that no website wil be able to counter:

i) Iraq has not WMD's.
Click to expand...

they just found 19 more sarin gas shells, each one is capable of killing about 5,000 people

if sadam had given just one of these to a terrorist to bring into the US, who wouldn't call that "mass destruction" ?
 
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Originally posted by: Isshinryu
http://bowlingfortruth.com/
Click to expand...

The main points that no website wil be able to counter:

i) Iraq has not WMD's.
ii) Iraq had no links with Al Qaeda.
iii) The coalition does suck, look at the coalition that was formed in the Gulf War or the countries that supported the attack on Afghanistan.
iv) Another commonly used excuse is that Iraq massacred thousands of civilians with chemical weapons. Interestingly, the US supplied Iraq with all those weapons.

I, for one, did not care for the rest of the movie and thought it was ok. If MM had concentrated on the Iraq war instead of going all over the place, that movie would have shaken America up.
Click to expand...

i) who cares. Saddam was a monster.
ii) that have been publicly released, sure. Neither you nor I can say for certain either way.
iii) Who cares if it sucks or not?
iv) who cares if we supplied them or not? He's the one that turned into this monster to use it on his own people
 
Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Originally posted by: Isshinryu
http://bowlingfortruth.com/
Click to expand...

The main points that no website wil be able to counter:

i) Iraq has not WMD's.
Click to expand...

they just found 19 more sarin gas shells, each one is capable of killing about 5,000 people

if sadam had given just one of these to a terrorist to bring into the US, who wouldn't call that "mass destruction" ?
Click to expand...

:beer:
 
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Originally posted by: Isshinryu
http://bowlingfortruth.com/
Click to expand...

The main points that no website wil be able to counter:

i) Iraq has not WMD's.
ii) Iraq had no links with Al Qaeda.
iii) The coalition does suck, look at the coalition that was formed in the Gulf War or the countries that supported the attack on Afghanistan.
iv) Another commonly used excuse is that Iraq massacred thousands of civilians with chemical weapons. Interestingly, the US supplied Iraq with all those weapons.

I, for one, did not care for the rest of the movie and thought it was ok. If MM had concentrated on the Iraq war instead of going all over the place, that movie would have shaken America up.
Click to expand...

Point: Saddam did have WMD, that's a known. He was told to provide evidence that he destroyed them, he never did.
Point: http://www.philvalentine.com/newwar.htm, just read it with no bias.

I'm not going to turn this into a P&N debate, just read what I have provided. You're free to make your own judgements.
 
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Originally posted by: Isshinryu
http://bowlingfortruth.com/
Click to expand...

The main points that no website wil be able to counter:

i) Iraq has not WMD's.
ii) Iraq had no links with Al Qaeda.
iii) The coalition does suck, look at the coalition that was formed in the Gulf War or the countries that supported the attack on Afghanistan.
iv) Another commonly used excuse is that Iraq massacred thousands of civilians with chemical weapons. Interestingly, the US supplied Iraq with all those weapons.

I, for one, did not care for the rest of the movie and thought it was ok. If MM had concentrated on the Iraq war instead of going all over the place, that movie would have shaken America up.
Click to expand...

i) who cares. Saddam was a monster.
ii) that have been publicly released, sure. Neither you nor I can say for certain either way.
iii) Who cares if it sucks or not?
iv) who cares if we supplied them or not? He's the one that turned into this monster to use it on his own people
Click to expand...


1)The world cares, because there are serious human rights violations by many governments around the globe and the US (or any other country) cannot pick and choose who it wishes to invade (...oh lookie here, oil).

2)By the same method of deduction, you couldn't prove Bush doesn't have strong ties to al-Qaeda.

3)Your arguments could be beaten by a middle-school debate team. "Who cares"? Do you know how to argue a point, or are the facts you need to prove your point with unavailable?

4)So why didn't we invade Iraq for the previous decade while these violations were occurring? Why aren't we invading countries in northern Africa right now? North Koreans have suffered for even longer, why not invade their country? They all have monsters.

Pretty easy for you to say "Who cares" while you're sitting cozy in your home, but American soldiers are being sent to their deaths everyday because our government decided that even though the facts were pointing the other way, "Who cares, let's invade Iraq anyway".
 
Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Originally posted by: Isshinryu
http://bowlingfortruth.com/
Click to expand...

The main points that no website wil be able to counter:

i) Iraq has not WMD's.
Click to expand...

they just found 19 more sarin gas shells, each one is capable of killing about 5,000 people

if sadam had given just one of these to a terrorist to bring into the US, who wouldn't call that "mass destruction" ?
Click to expand...

Link? I mean, this should be front page news across the world if you're telling the truth about 19 fully loaded and imminently dangerous sarin gas shells that were ready to deploy.

EDIT: I also want to know where you got this "5,000 people" figure.
 
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: GoodToGo
Originally posted by: Isshinryu
http://bowlingfortruth.com/
Click to expand...

The main points that no website wil be able to counter:

i) Iraq has not WMD's.
Click to expand...

they just found 19 more sarin gas shells, each one is capable of killing about 5,000 people

if sadam had given just one of these to a terrorist to bring into the US, who wouldn't call that "mass destruction" ?
Click to expand...

Link? I mean, this should be front page news across the world if you're telling the truth about 19 fully loaded and imminently dangerous sarin gas shells that were ready to deploy.

EDIT: I also want to know where you got this "5,000 people" figure.
Click to expand...

Do you have any clue what Sarin gas is or does?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top