- Jan 2, 2006
- 10,455
- 35
- 91
Sigma 100-300mm f/4 EX IF HSM Canon
I've been toying between buying this lens and the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8. The 70-200mm has a more convenient focal length for me and is brighter, but the 100-300mm's sheer image quality took the cake. The 70-200mm is soft-ish at f/2.8, and gets sharp at f/4, while the 100-300mm is very sharp even wide open at f/4.
This morning I saw a For Sale post on FredMiranda for this lens plus a Sigma EX 1.4x teleconverter. Lens was $550 (they're usually $650 used) and the TC was $110 (they're normally around $200 new). I emailed the seller saying I would buy both and he emailed me back saying I got the deal because he really wants to sell the two lenses together. When I got his reply I was just about to leave for class, so I said I'd pay him in a few hours after I got off school.
Right before I go to step out, I get an email from him saying he already received payment only for the 100-300mm from someone else, and that he'd have to sell the lens to him.
OMG OMG OMG
So I did something kinda ghetto. As soon as I got to school, I logged onto a computer and sent the $660 payment to him, hoping he'd think I didn't get his last email yet. I wanted to give him pause and rethink this. Now he's got my money and he's got the other person's money. The difference is that I'm buying both of his lenses at the same time, while the other guy is only buying the 100-300mm by itself.
When I get home, I check my email and find that he has sold the lenses to meeeeee.... yay!!!!
OMG 99% of ATOT doesn't care one iota about the above, but I just had to get it out
I've been toying between buying this lens and the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8. The 70-200mm has a more convenient focal length for me and is brighter, but the 100-300mm's sheer image quality took the cake. The 70-200mm is soft-ish at f/2.8, and gets sharp at f/4, while the 100-300mm is very sharp even wide open at f/4.
This morning I saw a For Sale post on FredMiranda for this lens plus a Sigma EX 1.4x teleconverter. Lens was $550 (they're usually $650 used) and the TC was $110 (they're normally around $200 new). I emailed the seller saying I would buy both and he emailed me back saying I got the deal because he really wants to sell the two lenses together. When I got his reply I was just about to leave for class, so I said I'd pay him in a few hours after I got off school.
Right before I go to step out, I get an email from him saying he already received payment only for the 100-300mm from someone else, and that he'd have to sell the lens to him.
OMG OMG OMG
So I did something kinda ghetto. As soon as I got to school, I logged onto a computer and sent the $660 payment to him, hoping he'd think I didn't get his last email yet. I wanted to give him pause and rethink this. Now he's got my money and he's got the other person's money. The difference is that I'm buying both of his lenses at the same time, while the other guy is only buying the 100-300mm by itself.
When I get home, I check my email and find that he has sold the lenses to meeeeee.... yay!!!!
OMG 99% of ATOT doesn't care one iota about the above, but I just had to get it out