• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I hope the US extradites X-ray UK nationals

Fencer128

Platinum Member
Hi,

I have one major problem with the US administration at the moment - and that is the procedure adopted at X-ray. Detention without trial, closed door system, military trials on the horizon, possible (probable) executions, etc.

I hear the UK is officially petitioning the US to extradite the UK nationals to the UK for trial. I don't know how you all feel about this but given the nature of the US system at the moment, I would have to strongly agree with the UK government.

Furthermore, in a not so selfish UK only view, I hope the court system opens up as compared to what we've so far been led to suspect will happen. Failure to do so will be seen by everyone for what it IMHO is - the automatic guilty, guilty,.... processing of each and every "detainee" - with the possiblity of the ultimate sanction. I don't believe in closed justice systems.

Cheers,

Andy

EDIT: Heard wrong. There is no "official" petitioning... well, at least not yet.
 
Originally posted by: Fencer128
Hi,

I have one major problem with the US administration at the moment - and that is the procedure adopted at X-ray. Detention without trial, closed door system, military trials on the horizon, possible (probable) executions, etc.

I hear the UK is officially petitioning the US to extradite the UK nationals to the UK for trial. I don't know how you all feel about this but given the nature of the US system at the moment, I would have to strongly agree with the UK government.

Furthermore, in a not so selfish UK only view, I hope the court system opens up as compared to what we've so far been led to suspect will happen. Failure to do so will be seen by everyone for what it IMHO is - the automatic guilty, guilty,.... processing of each and every "detainee" - with the possiblity of the ultimate sanction. I don't believe in closed justice systems.

Cheers,

Andy

Did they commit a crime in the UK or against a citizen of the UK? Why would we extradite them if they did not?

My only problem with what is happening at Gitmo is that an independent board should have been set up to determine the legal status of those being held (POW, legal combatant, illegal combatant, enemy combatant, etc) as is called for by the Geneva Convention. I don't think their status should change (for the most part) but I do think it would have stood up to a lot more scrutiny than just the unilateral decision of the President, which, by the way, is legal and not without precedent under our system.

 
Did they commit a crime in the UK or against a citizen of the UK? Why would we extradite them if they did not?

Were there any UK combatants in Afghanistan or workers in the WTC? It's not a question of involvement, it's that if you put *our* citizens through what many here believe is a biased and unjust "criminal justice" process the backlash towards the US in the UK will be huge.

My only problem with what is happening at Gitmo is that an independent board should have been set up to determine the legal status of those being held (POW, legal combatant, illegal combatant, enemy combatant, etc) as is called for by the Geneva Convention. I don't think their status should change (for the most part) but I do think it would have stood up to a lot more scrutiny than just the unilateral decision of the President, which, by the way, is legal and not without precedent under our system.

Good idea - I agree. This is not about laws and definitions IMHO. If the administration wants to put these people on trial in a public court they could do so easily. It seems to a great majority of people outside the US merely to be an attempt to process guilty convictions and possibly executions speedily and with minimum scrutiny (ie towards the standard of proof presented).

Cheers,

Andy

 
Did they commit a crime in the UK or against a citizen of the UK? Why would we extradite them if they did not?

My only problem with what is happening at Gitmo is that an independent board should have been set up to determine the legal status of those being held (POW, legal combatant, illegal combatant, enemy combatant, etc) as is called for by the Geneva Convention. I don't think their status should change (for the most part) but I do think it would have stood up to a lot more scrutiny than just the unilateral decision of the President, which, by the way, is legal and not without precedent under our system.

UK citizens died in the attack on the WTC. French died, Dutch died, Germans died. This was not only a tragedy for the US
 
once the military tribunal is over, they should be promptly liquidated for their attempted crimes. Unless they're U.S. citizens, they deserve no special treatments. British or otherwise, they're all foreigners who try to fight against the U.S. and her allies in one way or another. While the various methodologies dancing in my head would constitute cruelty, a simple electric chair should do the trick.

UK citizens died in the attack on the WTC. French died, Dutch died, Germans died. This was not only a tragedy for the US

WTF are you talking about? The attack happened on US soil. They died by chance. Al Qaeda target was the american system and her supporters. Are you saying that just because europeans died, the terrorists coming from that region deserve special treatment? Then why not give special treatment to the nationals of the other 89 countries that worked in the WTC.

EDIT: I just want to remind our european friends that we americans put our laws before those of any supranational organizations. American laws come first. There is little sympathy for foreign laws or foreigners who were caught in our nest. If an act was committed against AMERICANS ON AMERICAN SOIL, there will NEVER be any extradition of any kind that will give the terrorists a chance of freedom to kill again. While the british and belgians are used to the UN, EU, and other supranationals to dictate their lives, americans looked towards the US Constitution and Capital Hill. Your brothers will be treated as they are, terrorists that try to attack the United States and her citizens.
 
WTF are you talking about? The attack happened on US soil. They died by chance. Al Qaeda target was the american system and her supporters. Are you saying that just because europeans died, the terrorists coming from that region deserve special treatment? Then why not give special treatment to the nationals of the other 89 countries that worked in the WTC.

EDIT: I just want to remind our european friends that we americans put our laws before those of any supranational organizations. American laws come first. There is little sympathy for foreign laws or foreigners who were caught in our nest. If an act was committed against AMERICANS ON AMERICAN SOIL, there will NEVER be any extradition of any kind that will give the terrorists a chance of freedom to kill again. While the british and belgians are used to the UN, EU, and other supranationals to dictate their lives, americans looked towards the US Constitution and Capital Hill. Your brothers will be treated as they are, terrorists that try to attack the United States and her citizens.

you are one stupid mofo.



I was just saying that this was a tragedy for a lot of countries.



always scares me when people talk about a country as "her"

just look at some other Dari posts. He reminds me of the NAZI's. He's convinced that americans are some sort of an überrace

Dari, I suggest you start one of your lame "Bash the europeans and especially the french" thread.
You have a strange obsession about europeans. I suggest you look for medical help.
 
Originally posted by: Dari
once the military tribunal is over, they should be promptly liquidated for their attempted crimes. Unless they're U.S. citizens, they deserve no special treatments. British or otherwise, they're all foreigners who try to fight against the U.S. and her allies in one way or another. While the various methodologies dancing in my head would constitute cruelty, a simple electric chair should do the trick.

Well, no need even for a trial in your case. From what you say you know ahead of time that everyone of them is guilty. Kind of invalidates your opinion on the process IMHO.

WTF are you talking about? The attack happened on US soil. They died by chance. Al Qaeda target was the american system and her supporters. Are you saying that just because europeans died, the terrorists coming from that region deserve special treatment? Then why not give special treatment to the nationals of the other 89 countries that worked in the WTC.

It was UQ in his first post who said:

"Did they commit a crime in the UK or against a citizen of the UK? Why would we extradite them if they did not?"

Which is what that part of the debate stemmed from. In that context the fact that other nationalities died - regardless on whoever's soil - does have a bearing.

EDIT: I just want to remind our european friends that we americans put our laws before those of any supranational organizations. American laws come first. There is little sympathy for foreign laws or foreigners who were caught in our nest. If an act was committed against AMERICANS ON AMERICAN SOIL, there will NEVER be any extradition of any kind that will give the terrorists a chance of freedom to kill again. While the british and belgians are used to the UN, EU, and other supranationals to dictate their lives, americans looked towards the US Constitution and Capital Hill. Your brothers will be treated as they are, terrorists that try to attack the United States and her citizens.

You're a neocon - of course *you* put US laws first over any other kind of justice, but in the minds of the 90% of the non-US world who's opinions matter, and in the case of the UK, have a greater than usual impact on relations, trade, strategic alliances, etc - when you mix in people as yourself with pre-determined "justice" in mind and a closed and potentially (read IMHO probably) corrupt military court procedure - and by that I mean as it stands right now we won't get to see the standard of proof given, mainly IMHO because it will be farcical, is it any wonder that a lot of people here in the UK stare incredibly skeptically about what's about to happen. They have very little faith in your ability to hold a fair trial under present proposals.

And finally, many of these people were captured on Afghanistan soil. Some may not (that is what the trial is supposed to be about - if you even care I guess) have anything to with Al-Queda of 9/11 - but we may never know. Read that again - Afghanistan soil, so don't come the "American laws come first" - many of these people weren't even apprehended in the US!

Open your neocon eyes a little and consider the possibility that a number of these detainees may not be terrorists, nor may/will they get a fair trial. Do you understand the legitimate concern of the UK in that light? No, you probably don't.

Andy
 
Originally posted by: freegeeks
WTF are you talking about? The attack happened on US soil. They died by chance. Al Qaeda target was the american system and her supporters. Are you saying that just because europeans died, the terrorists coming from that region deserve special treatment? Then why not give special treatment to the nationals of the other 89 countries that worked in the WTC.

EDIT: I just want to remind our european friends that we americans put our laws before those of any supranational organizations. American laws come first. There is little sympathy for foreign laws or foreigners who were caught in our nest. If an act was committed against AMERICANS ON AMERICAN SOIL, there will NEVER be any extradition of any kind that will give the terrorists a chance of freedom to kill again. While the british and belgians are used to the UN, EU, and other supranationals to dictate their lives, americans looked towards the US Constitution and Capital Hill. Your brothers will be treated as they are, terrorists that try to attack the United States and her citizens.

you are one stupid mofo.



I was just saying that this was a tragedy for a lot of countries.



always scares me when people talk about a country as "her"

just look at some other Dari posts. He reminds me of the NAZI's. He's convinced that americans are some sort of an überrace

Dari, I suggest you start one of your lame "Bash the europeans and especially the french" thread.
You have a strange obsession about europeans. I suggest you look for medical help.

Better to just ignore, response is what it wants. But yes, its posts remind me of the same thing too...

 
always scares me when people talk about a country as "her"

EVERY country, like every ship, is seen as feminine. You must be scared often.

freegeeks, Whether or not americans are better is up to each individual. I, for one, seem to think we are in cases such as judicial prudence and economics. European and east asian financial systems are inherently unfit for truly global competition (pure free trade). There are many reasons why and I won't go into them over here.

As for judicial review, over 99% of the people that go on trial in Japan are found guilty. There is something inherently wrong with that. In Britain, the equivalents of US supreme court justices sit in the nation's parliament, which means they make the laws that they have to interpret, which is a complete farce to me. In france, the judge is also the prosecutor, or something to that effect. Basically the prosecutor has too much power in France.

You labelling me a Nazi, as have happened a lot here is not surprising considering that you have nothing further to say on this topic. Simple responses from a simple man.

You're a neocon - of course *you* put US laws first over any other kind of justice, but in the minds of the 90% of the non-US world who's opinions matter, and in the case of the UK, have a greater than usual impact on relations, trade, strategic alliances, etc - when you mix in people as yourself with pre-determined "justice" in mind and a closed and potentially (read IMHO probably) corrupt military court procedure - and by that I mean as it stands right now we won't get to see the standard of proof given, mainly IMHO because it will be farcical, is it any wonder that a lot of people here in the UK stare incredibly skeptically about what's about to happen. They have very little faith in your ability to hold a fair trial under present proposals.

Call me whatever you want, but I am an American and our laws hold primacy over any other. The 90% of the non-us world don't hold any sway on our judicial opinions. They don't matter. when they become us citizens, then we can count their opinions. The UK may be a strong ally, but she is just that, an ally. As for international relations, we deal with situations on a case-by-case scenerio. DON'T EVER try to corner us by putting everything in one basked and forcing us to choose one way or another.

And finally, many of these people were captured on Afghanistan soil. Some may not (that is what the trial is supposed to be about - if you even care I guess) have anything to with Al-Queda of 9/11 - but we may never know. Read that again - Afghanistan soil, so don't come the "American laws come first" - many of these people weren't even apprehended in the US!

Yes, they were caught in another part of the world. But they were caught because they were either in a war zone or they were caught in the terror nest. Either way, other nations don't get to pick and choose what they want and what they don't. Old international laws have to be reformed to catch up with the times. The Geneva Convention never envisioned suicidal followers of an ethereal phantom, hence they never wrote what actions were to be taken against them.

And you europeans don't understand the importance of the situation because you are not primary targets. We are. An ocean way and with relatively high percentages of muslims part of your citizenry, you take a lighter view of what is going on. Furthermore, you take no responsibility for your own actions that has led us to this point. Instead of repeatedly asking questions that have been answered by the Red Cross, europeans should start taking an impartial view of how the ruins of empires and the american directive will affect atavistic societies? And how can we help? That is what you should ask yourselves.

These trials are being held in these conditions because of the gravity of the situation. This protean enemy incubates, then goes into action when either the time is right or when certain words are uttered. They're dangerous because the ethereal phantom has supposedly given them certain instructions and they are bound to follow. As I've stated earlier, only US citizens will get special privileges because we are dealing with US laws. UK and other nationals will be treated as non-US. Some of these people will be let go, as have happened already. Those that pledged their allegiance to our enemy will be dealt with in a proper and just manner. But most people are forgetting that this is just one part of the war. There are many other frontlines, and they're being fought with the best of our abilities.

This is going to be a long war and the nexus has to be weakened before it can cause more damage. The war between man and god is what this is all about, in my opinion, and man has to win for his survival. The virus that these terrorists carry with them is nothing more than fear. Fear of the ethereal phantom. They want to instill it into others, just as it has been instilled into them. We can't let that happen.
 
Hi,

My better judgement told me not to reply to your last post - mainly because you ignored the point I made about your language reflecting the view that you appear to believe the detainees all guilty, even before any sort of "trial".

But anyway, there was a couple of points I had trouble letting go of.

Call me whatever you want, but I am an American and our laws hold primacy over any other. The 90% of the non-us world don't hold any sway on our judicial opinions. They don't matter. when they become us citizens, then we can count their opinions. The UK may be a strong ally, but she is just that, an ally. As for international relations, we deal with situations on a case-by-case scenerio.

Well, if it was purely a US matter - your own laws are the be all and end all (and in fact I never debated the fact that your laws are absolute) - but when you pick up UK nationals in was most likely a war zone, call them terrorists without declaring evidence and then subject them to what appears to be like a puppet-court-come-execution-conveyor-belt it, I'm afraid, does involve significant outside influences if not actual legal powers - especially when there's a presumed guilty mentality hovering like a cloud over camp X-ray right now. "Having the power to do something does not necessarily make it the right thing to do". This should have been carved into the door above the entrance to the oval office.

DON'T EVER try to corner us by putting everything in one basked and forcing us to choose one way or another.

That sounded like a threat, You maybe meant it as such. I wouldn't have imagined that failure to extradite would have resulted in the withdrawl of US bases from the UK, etc. Not yet anyway.

*chip*, *chip*, *chip*. That's the sound of public sympathy, confidence and identity being lost between the UK and the US. Give it 20 years of a war on terrorism (I can see it playing out for that kind of timecale) with a few pre-emptive wars every now and again and maybe we will see a larger divide open up.

Yes, they were caught in another part of the world. But they were caught because they were either in a war zone or they were caught in the terror nest. Either way, other nations don't get to pick and choose what they want and what they don't. Old international laws have to be reformed to catch up with the times. The Geneva Convention never envisioned suicidal followers of an ethereal phantom, hence they never wrote what actions were to be taken against them.

True, and the spirit of the old international laws *should* be obeyed (a matter of choice you understand) in the cases where it does not necessarily apply, but would most likely have if the situation was considered at conception. I highlighted the statement in bold because I think the word "other" should be changed to "all".

And you europeans don't understand the importance of the situation because you are not primary targets. We are.

Well, we're no stranger to terrorist activity if that's what you mean. Speak to us about the IRA, PIRA, Real IRA - the Spanish about Eta, the Russians about the Chetchens, etc......

An ocean way and with relatively high percentages of muslims part of your citizenry, you take a lighter view of what is going on.

How light a view is that?! Don't mistake "light" with "reasoned" or "balanced".

Furthermore, you take no responsibility for your own actions that has led us to this point. Instead of repeatedly asking questions that have been answered by the Red Cross, europeans should start taking an impartial view of how the ruins of empires and the american directive will affect atavistic societies? And how can we help? That is what you should ask yourselves.

That's right, the best thing we can do is to meddle?! Empire building was a failure, for everyone concerned but mostly for those countries that were consumed. Let's put aside the fact that as much as every country is contributing aid to developing countries they're also out for themselves in a large way too. The EU, the US, everyone I can think of.

I don't want to be a part of this and I use my vote and to a small extent (I'm not "rich") my money, to try and remove such influences - but I live in a country in the real world and this selfishness happens. Don't try and make me feel guilty like I don't care and you do.

These trials are being held in these conditions because of the gravity of the situation. This protean enemy incubates, then goes into action when either the time is right or when certain words are uttered. They're dangerous because the ethereal phantom has supposedly given them certain instructions and they are bound to follow. As I've stated earlier, only US citizens will get special privileges because we are dealing with US laws. UK and other nationals will be treated as non-US. Some of these people will be let go, as have happened already. Those that pledged their allegiance to our enemy will be dealt with in a proper and just manner. But most people are forgetting that this is just one part of the war. There are many other frontlines, and they're being fought with the best of our abilities.

This is going to be a long war and the nexus has to be weakened before it can cause more damage. The war between man and god is what this is all about, in my opinion, and man has to win for his survival. The virus that these terrorists carry with them is nothing more than fear. Fear of the ethereal phantom. They want to instill it into others, just as it has been instilled into them. We can't let that happen.

IMHO these trials are *partly* being held under maximum security for reasons of safety - but *mostly* in my view it's for the convenience of the court/administration/correct verdict. I've yet to see the openess of evidence needed to convince me or just about anyone else I've talked to, otherwise.

As for the other points in those two paragraphs - your language frightens me - it sounds like a cross between poetry and a strategy for war.

Cheers,

Andy
 
Dari,
first time I have hard of it being normal to call countries "her", and please take not of what has been talked about, I have never labeled you a nazi, I do hope you can you can be more rational in the future
 
This is going to be a long war and the nexus has to be weakened before it can cause more damage. The war between man and god is what this is all about, in my opinion, and man has to win for his survival. The virus that these terrorists carry with them is nothing more than fear. Fear of the ethereal phantom. They want to instill it into others, just as it has been instilled into them. We can't let that happen.
shiiiittt, think we have a radical religous extremist on the forum:Q
 
You labelling me a Nazi, as have happened a lot here is not surprising considering that you have nothing further to say on this topic. Simple responses from a simple man.

LOL

I rather be a "simple" man then the greatest neo-nazi f*cktard on this forum.

You are a scary pimple faced little boy. I'm not the only one in this forum who see you as an extremist.
I bet you have some kind of a shrine for Ashcroft
 
Originally posted by: Czar
This is going to be a long war and the nexus has to be weakened before it can cause more damage. The war between man and god is what this is all about, in my opinion, and man has to win for his survival. The virus that these terrorists carry with them is nothing more than fear. Fear of the ethereal phantom. They want to instill it into others, just as it has been instilled into them. We can't let that happen.
shiiiittt, think we have a radical religous extremist on the forum:Q

how the hell is that statement supporting religion? if anything it envisions the triumph of humanism over religious zealotry.

And everyone here needs to relax. The trials haven't started yet and everyone is getting their panties in a tizzy about what will happen.

freegeeks, your responses are getting simpler by the minute. If you've read any of my posts, you would know that I don't support ashcroft's ideologically. He's a religious fanatic that has been given a freehand in terrorist-related matters because of 9/11. I also have reservations for other leaders' actions. But I'll always defend his rational actions when some foreigner (you) attempts to undermine the hard work he is doing for our country. In other words, like the $0.10 whores in Budapest, you are in no position to criticize him.
 
Back
Top