I hear North Korea has fitted a nuke to a missile capable of reaching the U.S.

HappyPuppy

Lifer
Apr 5, 2001
16,997
2
71
Has anybod here read, "The Mouse That Roared"?

Will Bush surrender or institute a draft that will pick up all the illegal aliens in our country and send them off to put an end to Kim Jong Il?

Should I buy a bomb shelter? Maybe some guns? Who should I shoot?

This is quit unnerving and I need some direction.

:roll:
 

Grey

Platinum Member
Oct 14, 1999
2,737
2
81
Thats what the missile shield is for. (looks at hit % and gulps).

 

amol

Lifer
Jul 8, 2001
11,680
3
81
Bush isn't going to do anything ...

Washington, Oregon, and California voted blue
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,567
126
how about: sign up for the military, and when you complete your tour you get full citizenship.

that way, we can send the mexicans to fight our wars!
 

Wallydraigle

Banned
Nov 27, 2000
10,754
1
0
If I were pres I would threaten to send in wave after wave of Mexicans. And hippies. Kim Jong would back down in no time.
 

HappyPuppy

Lifer
Apr 5, 2001
16,997
2
71
If we loaded all the pimple farmers on ATOT on a boat and sent them to NK Kim would give up without a fight. Who the hell would ever want them but the good ol' US of A?
 

Colt45

Lifer
Apr 18, 2001
19,720
1
0
oh noes. I'm shaking in my boots in my basement with cans of food and my civil defense radiation survey meter.
 

Wallydraigle

Banned
Nov 27, 2000
10,754
1
0
Originally posted by: Colt45
oh noes. I'm shaking in my boots in my basement with cans of food and my civil defense radiation survey meter.


And teh wimmins. Don't evar forget teh wimmins.
 

sniperruff

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
11,644
2
0
Originally posted by: Wallydraigle
If I were pres I would threaten to send in wave after wave of Mexicans. And hippies. Kim Jong would back down in no time.

oh noes mexicans!!!!! we can't comprehend what they're saying!!!
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
We wanted to start the duck and cover program again. What better way than to supply NK with missles? It's brilliant I tell you!
 

KLin

Lifer
Feb 29, 2000
30,344
661
126
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
Has anybod here read, "The Mouse That Roared"?

Will Bush surrender or institute a draft that will pick up all the illegal aliens in our country and send them off to put an end to Kim Jong Il?

Should I buy a bomb shelter? Maybe some guns? Who should I shoot?

This is quit unnerving and I need some direction.

:roll:

Or we can send you over there so you can keep him company with your unending humor. :thumbsup:;)
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: ElFenix
how about: sign up for the military, and when you complete your tour you get full citizenship.

that way, we can send the mexicans to fight our wars!
w00t.. sounds like a plan.
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
I'm curious as to what the response would be if NK was succesful and hit a NW city. Obviously China isn't going tolet us come over and play with ground troops and a nuclear strike probably wouldn't happen either. Would China take care of NK?
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Who cares...so they hit one city and end up a flattened pile of rubble. Given that I say it's quite unlikely it will happen. I know you knew that already though :)
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
That's the REPORTED range. That particular missile is an untested upgraded version of a missile that would fall well short of HAWAII. In other words, it's a SCUD on steroids with a nuclear payload. REAL countries use ICBMs for this stuff. That is, to say, orbital missiles. This thing is atmospheric. It has to burn fuel the entire trip. NK's govt is just being PR hounds, as usual.

Even if they DID fire it, and assuming it really does have that range, it'd most likely

A) Go off in their own airspace
B) Miss altogether due to using inertial guidance
or C) Be shot down by our super-secret interceptor aircraft (it's an atmospheric missile)

In addition to

D)Set off an international incident from which NK would NEVER see the light of day again.

Assuming it even works, they have ONE. If they use it, EVERY country in the world will be all over their fvcking nuts. That is, assuming we don't retaliate and turn them into a wisp of dust before the UN conference call is even over. This guy might be nuts, but he's not nuts enough to vaporize himself, or set off a Chinese invasion of his so-called nation (and they WOULD do it, for their own security and to gain favor with the US).
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
With this president nuclear (or nukyular) retaliation is actually not out of the question. Probably a good thing in this one case since Kim Jong respects that more than diplomacy.

Last I read, NK was "believed capable" of arming a missile rather than actually in possession of one.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
With this president nuclear (or nukyular) retaliation is actually not out of the question. Probably a good thing in this one case since Kim Jong respects that more than diplomacy.
I can't think of any US president that would take a nuclear hit and not respond. In the case of a Russian missile you know that responding will set in motion a nice big WWIII, but in the case of some pissant nation like NK, why not? You can screw them up good and take no more than a busted lip over it, compared to the equivalent of putting them through a wood shredder. No doubt at all that the US would respond with a few nukes, for good measure.
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
With this president nuclear (or nukyular) retaliation is actually not out of the question. Probably a good thing in this one case since Kim Jong respects that more than diplomacy.

Last I read, NK was "believed capable" of arming a missile rather than actually in possession of one.

AFAIK they are in possesion of a two-stage rocket capable of hitting Hawaii and Alaska. The only question is if they are capable of hitting the NW and attatching the warhead to the rocket.
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
With this president nuclear (or nukyular) retaliation is actually not out of the question. Probably a good thing in this one case since Kim Jong respects that more than diplomacy.
I can't think of any US president that would take a nuclear hit and not respond. In the case of a Russian missile you know that responding will set in motion a nice big WWIII, but in the case of some pissant nation like NK, why not? You can screw them up good and take no more than a busted lip over it, compared to the equivalent of putting them through a wood shredder. No doubt at all that the US would respond with a few nukes, for good measure.

No. The only way to take them out without starting WWIII is to convince China to do it.

We would not retaliate.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
When I ponder all of the wonderful highly technical North Korean technology that I have around my house, I worry.:roll: