- Feb 26, 2000
- 7,006
- 1
- 81
GF <years>.<months> to wife 1.0
so if I have been with my GF for 1 year 6 months it would be GF 1.6 if I havent been with my girlfriend for more then a year then the decimal is moved over one place to the right, with the .M attachement, if the GF is pregnent then you add a decimal so it would be in my case GF 1.6.1 if its twins that number is increased, if you already have kids then the pregnent identifier is moved over one place to the right using the previous examples it would be 1.6.1.1 <years>.<months>.<kids>.<pregnent> once your upgrade to wife 1.0 the trailing decimals are added to the software version minus honeymoon identifier which becomes the second identifier, ex, wife <years>.<months>.<honeymoons>.<kids>.<Pregnent> so say I got married my wife software version number would be 0.0.1.1.1 except that I don't have any kids, I'm not married, I didn't go on a honeymoon and my girlfriends not pregnent
make sense?
so if I have been with my GF for 1 year 6 months it would be GF 1.6 if I havent been with my girlfriend for more then a year then the decimal is moved over one place to the right, with the .M attachement, if the GF is pregnent then you add a decimal so it would be in my case GF 1.6.1 if its twins that number is increased, if you already have kids then the pregnent identifier is moved over one place to the right using the previous examples it would be 1.6.1.1 <years>.<months>.<kids>.<pregnent> once your upgrade to wife 1.0 the trailing decimals are added to the software version minus honeymoon identifier which becomes the second identifier, ex, wife <years>.<months>.<honeymoons>.<kids>.<Pregnent> so say I got married my wife software version number would be 0.0.1.1.1 except that I don't have any kids, I'm not married, I didn't go on a honeymoon and my girlfriends not pregnent
make sense?