Originally posted by: Dirigible
You (or your kids) break it, you buy it.
I'm a father, and that's my motto.
Originally posted by: stinkynathan
home owner's insurance?
Originally posted by: Cuular
The lady should have immediately offered to pay for the damages. And then turned around and beat the kid senseless.
When I was young, we had to pay for anything we broke.
We had an allowance system setup where we got payed to do household chores, .05 for washing the dishes, .10 for cleaning a common room of the house, which included dusting, scrubbing, removing items left out by others, spot removing on carpets, etc. and .20 for mowing the lawn.
So we earned our allowance, and every week it was put in a savings account at the bank.
So if we screwed up and broke something at our house or anyone elses we had to pay for it with our own money. It instills a strong sense of responsibility for your and other peoples property.
It annoys the hell out of me that the majority of today's young people have never been taught about working for money, or that property is to be respected, and not messed with.
Originally posted by: EMPshockwave82
Originally posted by: stinkynathan
home owner's insurance?
why should his rates go up or be forced to make a claim because someone else had a brief lack of parental competency.
Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy
Originally posted by: sactoking
Originally posted by: StinkyPinky
That's not the point. Anyone with morals would know that if your kid breaks someones shit, you pay to replace it. If my son broke something like a glass fence (wtf?) I would offer to pay for it. What kind of person would think otherwise?
Actually, that was the point as it related to the post directly above mine. Kid breaks window, parents refuse to pay, homeowner sues, homeowner loses.
If the kid was 6 or younger, the homeowner wasted their money on court costs.
I'm going to need some documentation to back up this claim that the parents of children younger than 7 can't be held accountable financially for any destruction caused by their children. Quite frankly, it sounds like complete bullshit. I'm imagining a highly unrealistic, yet very costly, scenario, whereby some child hits a garage release and drops a garage door on someone's new Ferrari. It's bad, damage estimates topping $50,000. You're telling me that the owner of that car is completely SOL. I don't buy it.
