When Obama became President and the Union was about to fall under the control of Black Kenyan nationals conservatives bought up I don't really know how many guns. I am pretty sure it was a lot.
Now that Trump is about to turn the US into Nazi Germany I get a request in the mail for money to work for gun control at a time when all the ideal guns I have been reading about and investigating to buy for self defense and well regulated militia work in case of such need are California illegal. Will the real gun nuts please stand up! Seems I am supposed to donate to grease the rails to my very own gas chamber. All the guns, it would seem, are owned by the wrong side.
My moral dilemma then, is that I think liberals should rethink this: Personally I have somehow persuaded myself that I would rather have a gun to protect myself from someone who has made it his or her intention to kill me with a gun than not have one in such a situation. I know there is very little likelihood of such a scenario ever playing out, but still. Where did I go wrong? To be or not to be, is a philosophical question I think has deep application here. Trump makes the question arise for me.
Talk about nuts, I can buy a Gen 3 Glock 19 but not a Gen 5 which has valued improvements but essentially the same. The best 22 pistol is cal illegal because the parts are not individually serial number stamped. You can buy other 22s, just not the one that is considered the best. I understand conservative rage at liberals thinking they know what should and should not be legal when they have majority rule. Liberals are not opposed to shooting when it comes to shooting themselves in the foot.
I also believe there would be millions more people voting Democrat were it not for this issue. I also think that if there were millions more people voting Democrat we would in time not have the kind of gun violence we do.
Now that Trump is about to turn the US into Nazi Germany I get a request in the mail for money to work for gun control at a time when all the ideal guns I have been reading about and investigating to buy for self defense and well regulated militia work in case of such need are California illegal. Will the real gun nuts please stand up! Seems I am supposed to donate to grease the rails to my very own gas chamber. All the guns, it would seem, are owned by the wrong side.
My moral dilemma then, is that I think liberals should rethink this: Personally I have somehow persuaded myself that I would rather have a gun to protect myself from someone who has made it his or her intention to kill me with a gun than not have one in such a situation. I know there is very little likelihood of such a scenario ever playing out, but still. Where did I go wrong? To be or not to be, is a philosophical question I think has deep application here. Trump makes the question arise for me.
Talk about nuts, I can buy a Gen 3 Glock 19 but not a Gen 5 which has valued improvements but essentially the same. The best 22 pistol is cal illegal because the parts are not individually serial number stamped. You can buy other 22s, just not the one that is considered the best. I understand conservative rage at liberals thinking they know what should and should not be legal when they have majority rule. Liberals are not opposed to shooting when it comes to shooting themselves in the foot.
I also believe there would be millions more people voting Democrat were it not for this issue. I also think that if there were millions more people voting Democrat we would in time not have the kind of gun violence we do.