Leave it man,9400 gt is complete crap.The question is pretty much the title, I got an old 9400 gt laying around, would I benefit using it as a physx card or would it just cause more bottlenecks?
an 8800gt is about 5-6 times faster than a 9400gt in games.A 8800GT might have helped perhaps, but a 9400 GT is probably not even half as half. 8800GT too might or might not help. So 9400 is a waste IMO most probably
Why not just test it yourself and come back with numbers? ;-pThe question is pretty much the title, I got an old 9400 gt laying around, would I benefit using it as a physx card or would it just cause more bottlenecks?
The minimum requirement to support GPU-accelerated PhysX is a GeForce 8-series or later GPU with a minimum of 32 cores and a minimum of 256MB dedicated graphics memory. However, each PhysX application has its own GPU and memory recommendations. In general, 512MB of graphics memory is recommended unless you have a GPU that is dedicated to PhysX.
I did mention it.Okay, I had to check that myself. Looks like, your card (9400GT) doesn't even meet minimum requirements to run PhysX. Wish, somebody else had already checked that :whiste:
the 9400gt is so slow that it does not even meet the requirements to be used a dedicated physx card at all. even a 9500gt would do nothing but slow you down compared to letting your gtx670 do both graphics and physx. a 9600gt might break even compared to your gtx670 doing everything so even that would be a very poor physx card.