Devolutionistrue
Junior Member
I have the following: GeForce 4 - 4600, Antec 400W PS, 100Gig WD HD and a 21" Monitor... . I am lacking a MB, CPU, HSF and memory. If you had about $500 to spend on MB, CPU, HSF and memory,
1. What would you buy?
2. Who would you buy from?
I am leaning toward the ASUS P4B266 w/1.8A Northwood. I would like to get quality memory and HSF so that after a good "burn-in" I can overclock it some. Now I have heard that many people are going for the i850 chipset with good quality RDRAM and only mildly overclocking. My question is, would a 1.8G OC'd to 2.2G on a Rambus chipset out perform a 1.8G OC'd to 2.4G on a DDR chipset?
Or would I be better off going for an AMD setup and upgrading the CPU and ram at a later date? In other words has anyone seen the AMD/Intel CPU roadmaps and tell which chipset has the most longetivity? I still have a 440BX with a celeron 300A OC'd to 450 and have discovered that I can get a powerleap slot converter to stick a 1.2G or faster Tualatin in this ancient beast and still have the potential to overclock the Tualatin!!! Isn't that something. That would be like buying a chipset today that was originally designed to take a 1.5G-2.2G CPU and a couple years down the road be able to slap a 6Gig CPU in it. Here's the math: 300Mhz X 4 = 1.2Ghz / 1.5Ghz X 4 = 6Ghz. I know that this probably dreaming but my point is, I would rather have a chipset that is multi-generational than a faster initial chipset that is headed for a dead-end.
Since I have most of my system I am itching to finish it up and give my GeForce 4 - 4600 a good home, if you were going to buy within the next week what would you get?
Thanks
1. What would you buy?
2. Who would you buy from?
I am leaning toward the ASUS P4B266 w/1.8A Northwood. I would like to get quality memory and HSF so that after a good "burn-in" I can overclock it some. Now I have heard that many people are going for the i850 chipset with good quality RDRAM and only mildly overclocking. My question is, would a 1.8G OC'd to 2.2G on a Rambus chipset out perform a 1.8G OC'd to 2.4G on a DDR chipset?
Or would I be better off going for an AMD setup and upgrading the CPU and ram at a later date? In other words has anyone seen the AMD/Intel CPU roadmaps and tell which chipset has the most longetivity? I still have a 440BX with a celeron 300A OC'd to 450 and have discovered that I can get a powerleap slot converter to stick a 1.2G or faster Tualatin in this ancient beast and still have the potential to overclock the Tualatin!!! Isn't that something. That would be like buying a chipset today that was originally designed to take a 1.5G-2.2G CPU and a couple years down the road be able to slap a 6Gig CPU in it. Here's the math: 300Mhz X 4 = 1.2Ghz / 1.5Ghz X 4 = 6Ghz. I know that this probably dreaming but my point is, I would rather have a chipset that is multi-generational than a faster initial chipset that is headed for a dead-end.
Since I have most of my system I am itching to finish it up and give my GeForce 4 - 4600 a good home, if you were going to buy within the next week what would you get?
Thanks