Originally posted by: dreadpiratedoug
Oh, lookie:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/ru...sol-s-?urn=nba%2C65976
It appears if that's true, it'd be pretty f'ed up of West did this ...
West already said he had no part in the deal, and didn't find out until after it was done. I think West's reputation is such that there is no reason to believe that he isn't telling the truth.
What I don't get is, people are acting like the Grizzlies got swindled in the deal. First they got Javaris Crittenton who as a Laker fan, I was sad to see go, he will be a star in the NBA. They also are immediately able to relieve themselves of $9 million in salary when Kwame's contract expires this year, two first round draft picks, the rights to Marc Gasol who is playing extremely well in Europe, and cash.
Chris Ford had an article last week with various other scenarios for a Gasol trade and they were all ridiculous. Most involved teams giving up 5-6 players in return for Gasol, which is completely unrealistic because 1)The team giving the players would have had to suddenly sign free agents, and 2)The Grizzlies would had to cut people just to take on the new players. Not to mention that teams are very reluctant to trade that many players for one.
Here is the bottom line, the Lakers deal represented the
single largest expiring contract the grizzlies could get, along with talent in Javaris.