I fucking double dare anyone to tell me this isn't disgusting and the worst libel in the history of the world.
And the irony of it all is that the dickhead of the Soviet Policy Law Center just made an anti-semitic remark, I'll see if I can link to that later.
It's not disgusting nor the worst libel in history.....
It's not disgusting nor the worst libel in history.....
The SPLC as in the southern poverty law center? That article is so BS and full of lies. Ron Paul isn't an anti-semite and it doesn't surprise me that an extreme leftist magazine would make up lies like this.
The SPLC as in the southern poverty law center? That article is so BS and full of lies. Ron Paul isn't an anti-semite and it doesn't surprise me that an extreme leftist magazine would make up lies like this.
The SPLC as in the southern poverty law center? That article is so BS and full of lies. Ron Paul isn't an anti-semite and it doesn't surprise me that an extreme leftist magazine would make up lies like this.
Yep, sounds like a place Ron Paul would go, those are his kinds of people.One of the speakers scheduled to join McManus at the D.C. conference is E. Michael Jones, the South Bend, Ind.-based editor of Culture Wars magazine. The magazine’s cover stories have included “Judaizing: Then and Now,” “The Judaism of Hitler,” and “Shylock Comes to Notre Dame.”
In an article raging about a new president of Notre Dame University several years ago, Jones charged that anyone who went to a mainstream university would emerge “with a Jewish world view … and maybe a Jewish spouse.”
I fucking double dare anyone to tell me this isn't disgusting and the worst libel in the history of the world.
And the irony of it all is that the dickhead of the Soviet Policy Law Center just made an anti-semitic remark, I'll see if I can link to that later.
Ron Paul's a fucking nut, news at 11. Just like every other facet of his life (see sig).
Gotta love liberal intolerance.
Ron Paul predicted many of the currents problems the US has. He warned about it for years and leftists like yourself dismissed him. We would be better off with him than that piece of shit obama who serves Wall Street and the MIC.
I fucking double dare anyone to tell me this isn't disgusting and the worst libel in the history of the world.
And the irony of it all is that the dickhead of the Soviet Policy Law Center just made an anti-semitic remark, I'll see if I can link to that later.
First of all, he's managed to retain his wealth through his investments which is smarter than pissing it all away through risky investments.Since 1983 and for years before that, Paul has been claiming that the very crux of the financial system (fiat money supply, the Federal Reserve) should be abolished in favor of no Fed and gold-backed dollars using fixed exchange rates. So, how long did it take for Paul to get it right about the entire financial system collapsing? Never. You're out of your league.
Thanks for your curiosity. To answer your question: Because Dr. Paul is a fellow anarchist although he hasn't come out completely out of the closet. Mr Rothbard, a hardcore anarcho-capitalist and the founder of modern libertarianism would come out to defend Dr. Paul.I'm curious as to why you would care. You are an anarchist after all ...
They're trying to paint him as an anti-semite and that's dishonest.Is it really too much for you to actually enumerate and attempt to refute the items you believe are specifically lies in the linked article?
They're trying to paint him as an anti-semite and that's dishonest.
How the fuck do they know he's not going to announce that he's not an anti-semite?
First of all, he's managed to retain his wealth through his investments which is smarter than pissing it all away through risky investments.
Second of all, he's been a sage on foreign policy and on Obama.
Finally, you truly represent the worst of modern liberal elitism (as Incorruptible quite truthfully pointed out). Why don't you give me some of your money?
He may very well walk out of the conference in disgust of their anti-semitism.They said that he was going to speak at conference run by people who appear to be anti-semitic. Of course anyone can draw their own conclusions from there. Just like if Ron Paul decided to speak at the next KKK convention we would also be drawing conclusions. But so far you've done absolutely nothing to show that anything in the article is factually incorrect. Typically you don't invite people to speak at your event who think are going to call you out.