I hate being the devils advocate but plz read this *concerning Terrorist actions*

JImmyK

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,145
36
91
I totally agree, that any form of terrorism is by far the WORST thing that can be protrayed or carried out, but what did we all expect? Just because most of us have honestly been extremely ignorant to what goes on in the world this came as a huge shock, but personally I knew something was going to happen just not what and when. If some country starved my family my wife and my kids just because they didnt like the leader (which I dont either) I think Id react in a very damn negative way towards them (talking about iraq and america, plz read the article below). If ANYBODY killed my parents, my wife, my kids directly or indirectly Im gonna get them, every damn one of them.

I love my country (Yes I am an American, and a very proud one at that) and I want to just fly down to Afghanistan find this terrorist and kill him, just tear him apart. But I must admit I have felt so guilty all my life for what my country has done to others........

May god raise up the souls of those who have suffered and will suffer, and show them a happiness that we will one day share with them. Amen.


http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=93623


The wickedness and awesome cruelty of a crushed and humiliated people


By Robert Fisk


12 September 2001

So it has come to this. The entire modern history of the Middle East ­ the collapse of the Ottoman empire, the Balfour declaration, Lawrence of Arabia's lies, the Arab revolt, the foundation of the state of Israel, four Arab-Israeli wars and the 34 years of Israel's brutal occupation of Arab land ­ all erased within hours as those who claim to represent a crushed, humiliated population struck back with the wickedness and awesome cruelty of a doomed people. Is it fair ­ is it moral ­ to write this so soon, without proof, when the last act of barbarism, in Oklahoma, turned out to be the work of home-grown Americans? I fear it is. America is at war and, unless I am mistaken, many thousands more are now scheduled to die in the Middle East, perhaps in America too. Some of us warned of "the explosion to come''. But we never dreamt this nightmare.

And yes, Osama bin Laden comes to mind, his money, his theology, his frightening dedication to destroy American power. I have sat in front of bin Laden as he described how his men helped to destroy the Russian army in Afghanistan and thus the Soviet Union. Their boundless confidence allowed them to declare war on America. But this is not the war of democracy versus terror that the world will be asked to believe in the coming days. It is also about American missiles smashing into Palestinian homes and US helicopters firing missiles into a Lebanese ambulance in 1996 and American shells crashing into a village called Qana and about a Lebanese militia ­ paid and uniformed by America's Israeli ally ­ hacking and raping and murdering their way through refugee camps.

No, there is no doubting the utter, indescribable evil of what has happened in the United States. That Palestinians could celebrate the massacre of 20,000, perhaps 35,000 innocent people is not only a symbol of their despair but of their political immaturity, of their failure to grasp what they had always been accusing their Israeli enemies of doing: acting disproportionately. All the years of rhetoric, all the promises to strike at the heart of America, to cut off the head of "the American snake'' we took for empty threats. How could a backward, conservative, undemocratic and corrupt group of regimes and small, violent organisations fulfil such preposterous promises? Now we know.

And in the hours that followed yesterday's annihilation, I began to remember those other extraordinary assaults upon the US and its allies, miniature now by comparison with yesterday's casualties. Did not the suicide bombers who killed 241 American servicemen and 100 French paratroops in Beirut on 23 October 1983, time their attacks with unthinkable precision?

There were just seven seconds between the Marine bombing and the destruction of the French three miles away. Then there were the attacks on US bases in Saudi Arabia, and last year's attempt ­ almost successful it now turns out ­ to sink the USS *Cole *in Aden. And then how easy was our failure to recognise the new weapon of the Middle East which neither Americans nor any other Westerners could equal: the despair-driven, desperate suicide bomber.

And there will be, inevitably, and quite immorally, an attempt to obscure the historical wrongs and the injustices that lie behind yesterday's firestorms. We will be told about "mindless terrorism'', the "mindless" bit being essential if we are not to realise how hated America has become in the land of the birth of three great religions.

Ask an Arab how he responds to 20,000 or 30,000 innocent deaths and he or she will respond as decent people should, that it is an unspeakable crime. But they will ask why we did not use such words about the sanctions that have destroyed the lives of perhaps half a million children in Iraq, why we did not rage about the 17,500 civilians killed in Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon. And those basic reasons why the Middle East caught fire last September ­ the Israeli occupation of Arab land, the dispossession of Palestinians, the bombardments and state-sponsored executions ... all these must be obscured lest they provide the smallest fractional reason for yesterday's mass savagery.

No, Israel was not to blame ­ though we can be sure that Saddam Hussein and the other grotesque dictators will claim so ­ but the malign influence of history and our share in its burden must surely stand in the dark with the suicide bombers. Our broken promises, perhaps even our destruction of the Ottoman Empire, led inevitably to this tragedy. America has bankrolled Israel's wars for so many years that it believed this would be cost-free. No longer so. But, of course, the US will want to strike back against "world terror'', and last night's bombardment of Kabul may have been the opening salvo. Indeed, who could ever point the finger at Americans now for using that pejorative and sometimes racist word "terrorism''?

Eight years ago, I helped to make a television series that tried to explain why so many Muslims had come to hate the West. Last night, I remembered some of those Muslims in that film, their families burnt by American-made bombs and weapons. They talked about how no one would help them but God. Theology versus technology, the suicide bomber against the nuclear power. Now we have learnt what this means.
 

JImmyK

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,145
36
91
people need to calm down. and stop taking things out of context. sending threatining emails helps nothing and changes nothing
 

Stark

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2000
7,735
0
0


<< 34 years of Israel's brutal occupation of Arab land >>


that's about as far as I got... I can guess the rest.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
It is also about American missiles smashing into Palestinian homes and US helicopters firing missiles into a Lebanese ambulance in 1996 and American shells crashing into a village called Qana and about a Lebanese militia ­ paid and uniformed by America's Israeli ally ­ hacking and raping and murdering their way through refugee camps.


Heck yeah... the US decided on those occassions out of boredom to randomly launch missiles into Palestinian homes. Show me a single incident where an action by the US or Israel wasn't due to a response that was committed first.

You know, sh1t happens... it happens when your playing with such dangerous things as war. If you for an instant think those acts were purposely committed with no reason whatsoever, then there's no reasoning with your warp little mind.

But they will ask why we did not use such words about the sanctions that have destroyed the lives of perhaps half a million children in Iraq, why we did not rage about the 17,500 civilians killed in Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon.

Hm, maybe i imagined this, but didn't Iraq invaded a little country called Kuwait?

Maybe some people should wake up... the choice was to continue moving into Iraq, continue the war and killing, and fight Saddam in his capitol where more innocent blood would occur, or end the war and hopefully a civil war will usurp him.

And as for the sanctions, it's because of the actions of one man, not because of the US. All he has to do is give up his development of weapons of mass destruction, allowed the UN to inspect his facilities, and spend money on his country's needs rather than his military desires.

Eight years ago, I helped to make a television series that tried to explain why so many Muslims had come to hate the West. Last night, I remembered some of those Muslims in that film, their families burnt by American-made bombs and weapons. They talked about how no one would help them but God.

So who began first... the US bombing the Muslims, or the Muslims assaults on Israel, and their and the US response to those assaults?

If everybody lived in peace... if they could just coexist with the Israelis, none of this would have happened. Maybe the world should just step away from the middle east for 10 years, and not involve themselves in anyways. Let all those countries handle it themselves. What would the result be? I'll guess that Israel would wipe out all their enemies, and landlock themselves surrounded by nuclear wastelands... but we'll finally have peace, and maybe that's what needs to happen.
 

JImmyK

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,145
36
91
Im glad ur good at guessing but its written by one of us, there are no misleading lies in it. Its all just plain facts, goto any search engine and do a search on the situation in Israel. How can you agree with what goes on there?!?!

Honestly I am grateful to the All Mighty for all the good our people and Country have done, but I am also ashamed of things we have done.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Im glad ur good at guessing but its written by one of us, there are no misleading lies in it. Its all just plain facts, goto any search engine and do a search on the situation in Israel. How can you agree with what goes on there?!?!

That's because you have the intelligence of a 6th grader. You see an event, and you'll automatically subscribe it as 'evidence' of brutal acts... but you don't bother to investigate or think critically beyond that event. These 'acts' aren't commited randomly, or out of hate. They were always in response to an attack, and like it or not, civilians do get hurt. It's not intentional, but when you have war, it's going to happen.

Like i said, perhaps the world does need to get out of the middle east and let them handle it themselves. Next thing you'll hear is all the whining from all the Muslim communities of the world that the Israelis are kicking their ass.

 

JImmyK

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,145
36
91
Now its bieng generalized to the whole religion? Are we condeming all Muslims now? God help us all...

It was started by the Israelites, please tell me you have some basic knowledge of history.

Why did we do so much for Kuwait and nothing for Bosnia? We admitted a 100 times over that whats happening in Bosnia is WRONG WRONG WRONG yet its still happening isnt it? The answer is we didnt do crap for Kuwait we were jsut saving our own asses, and that is a good thing. Heck Im always going to watchmy 6 no matter what, BUT if I say I did it out of kindness, then I am a liar and a hypocrite.


Why are we starving the children and familys of Iraq? they have no choice they are stuck int aht coutnry, they cant jsut buy a ticket and fly the heck out. We should jstu assassinate Saddam, why havent we done that? I dont udnerstand, why the f@ck isnt Saddam dead?!?!?
 

JImmyK

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,145
36
91
Now that makes sense to me, if your going to "get in" then dont be half assed do the job right, if not just get the f out then.

Please lets not try to generalize a whole religion. There are over a billion Muslims (or so I bleive) and there is no need to create stereotypes.

I have alreayd had muslim friends here on campus, that are Americans and have lived here ALL their lives, but are victims of malicious comments and some freshmen got beat badly last night.

Sometimes I feel like we are going back in time, first the Native americans were prosecuted, then the African Americans, and nows its the muslim Americans turn..... we need to stop and remedy this problem.
 

wnied

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
4,206
0
76
I agree with MoralPanic that your ideas of the USA simply attacking without justification is at best...a farce. You research nothing, say anything and do nothing all in the same post. Do us all the favor of thinking twice before posting your uninformed blither in this forum.

They're Not Soldiers

They're Not Martyrs

They're Scum.

:|~wnied~:|
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
It was started by the Israelites, please tell me you have some basic knowledge of history.

yeah yeah yeah, we know what your version of history is.


Why did we do so much for Kuwait and nothing for Bosnia? We admitted a 100 times over that whats happening in Bosnia is WRONG WRONG WRONG yet its still happening isnt it? The answer is we didnt do crap for Kuwait we were jsut saving our own asses, and that is a good thing. Heck Im always going to watchmy 6 no matter what, BUT if I say I did it out of kindness, then I am a liar and a hypocrite.

Bosnia wasn't such a clearcut case because it was a civil war. But Kuwait was an invasion. And yes, saving our own asses was part of it. What makes you think he was going to stop at Kuwait? He had plans for Saudi Arabia as well. How would you like one madman controlling 60% of the oil reserves in the world?

Why are we starving the children and familys of Iraq? they have no choice they are stuck int aht coutnry, they cant jsut buy a ticket and fly the heck out. We should jstu assassinate Saddam, why havent we done that? I dont udnerstand, why the f@ck isnt Saddam dead?!?!?

Like i said, it's very easy for Iraq to stop the starvation... all Saddam needs to do is comply with UN inspection and divert his money from weapon productions to his domestic needs. What makes you think if we end the sanctions money will be used properly? We don't know 100% what his behavior will be if we do, but the best predictor of behavior is past behavior, and we already know he doesnt' care about his people and only of his military.

As for why we don't kill him... it would take another invasion, and if you're crying over sanctions, i definitely know you won't endorse an invasion. Assassination? not going to happen since the US had a presidential decree on assassination. And Saddam is one paranoid freak, don't think the rebels never tried (or anybody that wasn't to take his place).
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Now that makes sense to me, if your going to "get in" then dont be half assed do the job right, if not just get the f out then.

Like i said, your crying over sanctions, what would you feel if we did went in to 'finish' the job? Do you not remember he had civilians moved into military installations in hopes of the US not bombing them? If the US and everybody else did move in, it wouldn't have been a clean fight... he would have thrown civilians after civilians ahead of him to save his ass.

So they decided to let him live... and hope that the war weaked him enough that the rebels would take him out (but he took them out before the rebels were ready).


Please lets not try to generalize a whole religion. There are over a billion Muslims (or so I bleive) and there is no need to create stereotypes.


The public anger will end. Nobody is going to wipe anybody out. There may be a war, but it won't be on the entire civilian population.
 

JImmyK

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,145
36
91
I honestly do udnerstand what you are saying, for those who insulted me I udenrstand your frustration and will take no offense no matter how hard you try. For those who expaliend their point of view, thank you somethings are cleared up I do understand the civil war issue now and the iraw invasion makes sense.

But still I dont understand the sanctions Saddam obviously doesnt care, hes never going to care about his people, hundreds of thousands are starving and dieing there and we can stop that. Saddam doesnt care so they will keep on dieing, but we should care and we should just assassinate him. Whats going to happen if we kill him? are going to get in "trouble"? come on thats ridiculous.

and about the history of that region, just search "THE ARAB CANAANITES" I cant afford the time fora detailed explanation there is enough literature out there.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
But still I dont understand the sanctions Saddam obviously doesnt care, hes never going to care about his people, hundreds of thousands are starving and dieing there and we can stop that. Saddam doesnt care so they will keep on dieing, but we should care and we should just assassinate him. Whats going to happen if we kill him? are going to get in "trouble"? come on thats ridiculous.


What makes you think lifting sanctions will help his people and not him? The sale of oil from Iraq prewar is about equal to Kuwait, but Kuwaitis lived in a MUCH better society than than the average Iraqis. Why's that? Because Iraq spends most of the revenues on the military.

Correct me if i'm wrong, but Iraq for awhile, was able to sell oil in exchange for things like baby formulas and food... and i don't think he was too happy about that.

He lost a war, and one of the requisite to that is that he is not allowed to possess weapons of mass destruction. All he has to do is open up his facilities to UN inspections, and things will get much better quickly. He chooses not to, and he and his country is suffering from that decision.
 

JImmyK

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,145
36
91
but thats my whole point, that its HIS decision not teh countries. why must a million suffer for one mans actions? isnt that everything we stand against?

Are you telling me this is the best solution? there must be a better alternative. I do not belive that this is the only option.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
but thats my whole point, that its HIS decision not teh countries. why must a million suffer for one mans actions? isnt that everything we stand against?

Are you telling me this is the best solution? there must be a better alternative. I do not belive that this is the only option.


Because he lost a war. You have to pay repercussions when you invade another country, and his was that he's not allowed to possess any weapons of mass destruction. If sanctions are lifted and he gets a steady revenues, what do you think the first he's going to do? Build schools and hospitals? No, build up an arsenal of biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons. He doesn't want those weapon so he can parade them down the street infront of his starving citizens.



 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
The people of his country can overthrow him and pick a new leader. One that is more interested in their welfare than waging war.

The US cannot assassinate a foreign head of state. Haven?t you seen the people bashing the US for messing in foreign affairs. What do you think would happen if we did go into Iraq and take him out


 

spanky

Lifer
Jun 19, 2001
25,716
4
81
if u want to be devils advocate, please go create a "terrorists forum" somewhere else. victims of this tragedy extend much further than just those who lost their lives, but also to the family and friends of those people. can you imagine the psychological damage this sort of trauma has on them? please have a little compasion for those who have lost or know someone who has lost friends/family in thie horrible tragedy.