It is a common belief among many audiophiles that high quality cable means alot in their audio system. Many of the buy the super-duper cable off a role at a store including myself, except it comes from completely different supplier. They get their $5/ft speaker cable from local pro audio shop, circuit city and such. I buy them from Lowe's electrical section or splice apart an old extension cord and use it as a speaker cable. Currently I am using a pair of 12AWG UL certified white flat cable and it sounds fine. I don't go out and spend $50 on the stupid cable, because nobody gave me a good enough reason and I personally can't tell the difference. A friend of mine claims cable quality can influence the maximum volume, extreme high and low frequencies response and distortion characteristic.
When you look at the physics involved in an electrical conductor, there are resistance, inductance, skin effect and capacitance of the insulator. The capacitance of the insulator is so miniscule that it is not an effective factor in audio frequency(10-40,000Hz , We can only hear up to 20,000Hz, but when two waves of different frequency combines it can create different sound even if one of the sound wave is over 20,000Hz) in my opinion so I will eliminate it here.
The difference in maximum volume is inversely proportional to conductor resistance and this is the function of wire thickness and not of whether you have an audiophile cable or average 12AWG braided electrical wire.
Skin effect is detectable at audio frequency, but I doubt there is audible difference between audio cable and cheapo AC cable so I don't think it matters.
Finally the inductance of the conductor. Last time I checked, this is relevant to the length and the magnetic properties of the surrouding material(air) and super-duper audiophile cable has similar inductance as standard AC cable.
As you can see above I have plenty of reasons why I think its equal, yet not a single reason super-duper ultra cable makes the sound better other than psychological thought that owner gets adapted to the thought their system sounds better after dropping $100 on their speaker cable. As long as the primary composition of the conductors in a braided wire is copper, it is going to behave very closely no matter how you label it.
Did I miss something here? I don't have enough proofs to conclude that audiophile cable doesn't make a difference and if you think it makes a difference please reply with good scientific argument. I have heard enough of "The expensive wires are made for audio and they sound better" and that is not what I want to hear for the 100th time.
When you look at the physics involved in an electrical conductor, there are resistance, inductance, skin effect and capacitance of the insulator. The capacitance of the insulator is so miniscule that it is not an effective factor in audio frequency(10-40,000Hz , We can only hear up to 20,000Hz, but when two waves of different frequency combines it can create different sound even if one of the sound wave is over 20,000Hz) in my opinion so I will eliminate it here.
The difference in maximum volume is inversely proportional to conductor resistance and this is the function of wire thickness and not of whether you have an audiophile cable or average 12AWG braided electrical wire.
Skin effect is detectable at audio frequency, but I doubt there is audible difference between audio cable and cheapo AC cable so I don't think it matters.
Finally the inductance of the conductor. Last time I checked, this is relevant to the length and the magnetic properties of the surrouding material(air) and super-duper audiophile cable has similar inductance as standard AC cable.
As you can see above I have plenty of reasons why I think its equal, yet not a single reason super-duper ultra cable makes the sound better other than psychological thought that owner gets adapted to the thought their system sounds better after dropping $100 on their speaker cable. As long as the primary composition of the conductors in a braided wire is copper, it is going to behave very closely no matter how you label it.
Did I miss something here? I don't have enough proofs to conclude that audiophile cable doesn't make a difference and if you think it makes a difference please reply with good scientific argument. I have heard enough of "The expensive wires are made for audio and they sound better" and that is not what I want to hear for the 100th time.