• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I don't think he will hunt in grizzly bear country again...

Nitemare

Lifer
link

JACKSON, Wyoming (AP) -- Weston Scott crept through the dense forest looking to flush out an elk. He got excited when he heard rustling about 10 feet ahead, in some bushes.

What Scott saw in those first seconds last Sunday was a bear's head coming right at him. He drew up his rifle but managed only to get a shot off from about his hip before the 600-pound grizzly was on top of him.

"I think it went right over his head," Scott said Wednesday from his hospital room in Idaho Falls, Idaho, about 175 miles from Bridger-Teton National Forest, where the attack occurred. "That was all I had time to do. He was on me after that."

As Scott, 32, fell to the ground, the bear bit him in the face. It took out four teeth on Scott's lower jaw and a 1-inch portion of jawbone.

Scott later told his wife, Tammy, that he was sure he would die when he saw the bear so close. He told her the bear made no sounds -- no grunting or growling.

"It was definitely coming after him to hurt him," she said. "It was coming at him with his mouth open."

She said her husband never said anything about pain, possibly because his adrenaline kicked in immediately.

"I can't imagine the absolute terror he must have experienced," she said.

Tammy Scott said after the bear bit her husband's face, it continued to knock him around.

"He's got surface wounds kind of everywhere" -- on his knees, side and back, she said. "Looking at him, you know he got rolled around by a bear."

The bear swung one last time at Scott, pushing him between two trees, and left. Scott got up and ran out of the woods, about a quarter of a mile.

On his way out, he could see the bear still lurking. Officials said the animal was then killed by a hunting companion acting in self-defense.

Tammy Scott said her husband has had enough.

"I don't think he will hunt in grizzly bear country again," she said. "One of the first things out of his mouth was, 'I don't ever want to feel like that again."'
 
thats what that guy gets. if there was a guy on my property pointing a gun in my direction, i would try to hurt him too ...
 
Wow, that would suck. I've been face to face with bears in the woods (while hunting) on a couple of occasions, and within 50 feet on at least a dozen occasions.

I always seem to see them right before bear season begins, then it's like they all hide from me. Although, last year a 250 pound bear ran under my stand... with her cub. (making her safe from a shot from me.)
 
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: pulse8
They should find that bear and kill it.

Officials said the animal was then killed by a hunting companion acting in self-defense.

You go to public school? 😛

he mean't kill it again

Yeah. Any bear that would attack a human should be killed.

Yes, kill an animal when you impose on its territory. :disgust:
 
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: pulse8
They should find that bear and kill it.

Officials said the animal was then killed by a hunting companion acting in self-defense.

You go to public school? 😛

he mean't kill it again

Yeah. Any bear that would attack a human should be killed.

Yes, kill an animal when you impose on its territory. :disgust:

Who says it's it's territory?
 
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: pulse8
They should find that bear and kill it.

Officials said the animal was then killed by a hunting companion acting in self-defense.

You go to public school? 😛

he mean't kill it again

Yeah. Any bear that would attack a human should be killed.

Yes, kill an animal when you impose on its territory. :disgust:
With a first name of Chad, and living in Oklahoma, I'm sure your American Indian right? :disgust:
 
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: pulse8
They should find that bear and kill it.

Officials said the animal was then killed by a hunting companion acting in self-defense.

You go to public school? 😛

he mean't kill it again

Yeah. Any bear that would attack a human should be killed.

Yes, kill an animal when you impose on its territory. :disgust:

Who says it's it's territory?

Well, considering the overwhelming anthropocentric mentality of most people, it's probably not; anywhere a human can go, the indigenous animals can be easily displaced it seems.

If I go scuba diving off of Seal Island, should I be surprised if I get attacked by a Great White? I consider that a human imposition. The man acknowledged it was grizzly bear country, and yet he decided to hunt there anyway. It was caveat emptor, and he found out the hard way that his end of the transaction was less favorable.
 
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: pulse8
They should find that bear and kill it.

Officials said the animal was then killed by a hunting companion acting in self-defense.

You go to public school? 😛

he mean't kill it again

Yeah. Any bear that would attack a human should be killed.

Yes, kill an animal when you impose on its territory. :disgust:
With a first name of Chad, and living in Oklahoma, I'm sure your American Indian right? :disgust:

That's a seriously pathetic argument; however...

I am Cherokee, moron. How stupid do you feel now?
 
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: pulse8
They should find that bear and kill it.

Officials said the animal was then killed by a hunting companion acting in self-defense.

You go to public school? 😛

he mean't kill it again

Yeah. Any bear that would attack a human should be killed.

Yes, kill an animal when you impose on its territory. :disgust:

Who says it's it's territory?

Well, considering the overwhelming anthropocentric mentality of most people, it's probably not; anywhere a human can go, the indigenous animals can be easily displaced it seems.

If I go scuba diving off of Seal Island, should I be surprised if I get attacked by a Great White? I consider that a human imposition. The man acknowledged it was grizzly bear country, and yet he decided to hunt there anyway. It was caveat emptor, and he found out the hard way that his end of the transaction was less favorable.

By your logic all humans would never have come down out of the trees or out of their caves.
 
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: pulse8
They should find that bear and kill it.

Officials said the animal was then killed by a hunting companion acting in self-defense.

You go to public school? 😛

he mean't kill it again

Yeah. Any bear that would attack a human should be killed.

Yes, kill an animal when you impose on its territory. :disgust:

Who says it's it's territory?

Well, considering the overwhelming anthropocentric mentality of most people, it's probably not; anywhere a human can go, the indigenous animals can be easily displaced it seems.

If I go scuba diving off of Seal Island, should I be surprised if I get attacked by a Great White? I consider that a human imposition. The man acknowledged it was grizzly bear country, and yet he decided to hunt there anyway. It was caveat emptor, and he found out the hard way that his end of the transaction was less favorable.

By your logic all humans would never have come down out of the trees or out of their caves.

I'm quite capable of having a personal philosophy independent of the transgressions of others.
 
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: pulse8
They should find that bear and kill it.

Officials said the animal was then killed by a hunting companion acting in self-defense.

You go to public school? 😛

he mean't kill it again

Yeah. Any bear that would attack a human should be killed.

Yes, kill an animal when you impose on its territory. :disgust:
With a first name of Chad, and living in Oklahoma, I'm sure your American Indian right? :disgust:

That's a seriously pathetic argument; however...

I am Cherokee, moron. How stupid do you feel now?
OK, so go defend your territory, and see if it's justified.

The argument works wether your an indian or not, of course you assumed incorrectly. My point is you are either an indian on "your territory" or your an "invader." Replace bear with indian in your comment and it's just as rediculous. When territory is concerned might generaly makes right, it has nothing to do with possesion. Your argument is right, just for the wrong reason.

Did you know where I was going with that, moron, or did you ASSUME?
 
Back
Top