I went to a lan party this weekend with a buddy of mine who has a 1.7 GHz P4 and a GF2 Ultra. I myself have a Thunderbird 933 MHz and a GF DDR.
Anyhoo, we decided to compare our systems performance in Quake III, running in 640 by 480 all options off he gets 209 FPS and I get 163 FPS. In 1024/768 with all options turned on he gets 136 FPS and I get 98 FPS.
Anyway, at first I was a little upset, but then after about an hour playing 32 player Q3 over lan I realised I was owning everyone. I had met the fraglimit on the last four maps in a row while he was just doing average.
Then it occured to me that he had spent $2,500 on his system total, and for what? A measly 38 FPS and a losing Quake III score. I paid only 798 total for my system including a nice monitor, SB live and 256 Meg ram. So in the end the FPS weren't helping out at all. Yeah his system will last longer maybe, but my little GF DDR system ain't so bad! I kinda like my 98 FPS anyhow!
Anyhoo, we decided to compare our systems performance in Quake III, running in 640 by 480 all options off he gets 209 FPS and I get 163 FPS. In 1024/768 with all options turned on he gets 136 FPS and I get 98 FPS.
Anyway, at first I was a little upset, but then after about an hour playing 32 player Q3 over lan I realised I was owning everyone. I had met the fraglimit on the last four maps in a row while he was just doing average.
Then it occured to me that he had spent $2,500 on his system total, and for what? A measly 38 FPS and a losing Quake III score. I paid only 798 total for my system including a nice monitor, SB live and 256 Meg ram. So in the end the FPS weren't helping out at all. Yeah his system will last longer maybe, but my little GF DDR system ain't so bad! I kinda like my 98 FPS anyhow!
