K-20 Body.... 547.23 after all is said and done. I thought long and hard about K-20 vs K-7. K-7 offers largely features. Faster AF, better WB, 720p mode + 16:9 mode (1536x1024 i think?) , lots of nice digital filters, electronic level, cold proof weather seals , magnesium body, sleekier appearance + better hand grip (yup yup I agree it is better...and the newgrip is much improved over the old BG-2), faster shutter (gives that 1/8000), auto rotate the LCD, live view that doesn't suck shit, MOAR FPS, HDR Mode, 100% VF (imo I'd rather have 100% .92), built in AF light for wide lenses, auto distortion, auto CA correction, etc etc etc etc.
But I can't say that right now, given my situation, its worth over double the cost (especially at the cost I got the K-20 body).
Image IQ is essentially the same....and that ultimately what counts.
I will say had my 100D flash mount not broken (totally my fault lol), then this would not be an issue...I would have waited for the K7 to hit about 1k.
But at this point I suppose I'll skip out and see what happens over the next 3 years....and enjoy my K20D! The K100D still makes for a great availible light camera, but I find myself using my flashgun too often. Now I think when I want to look serious I'll put a tele on the 100D and a walk around on the K20....that'll make people think I'm pro
But I can't say that right now, given my situation, its worth over double the cost (especially at the cost I got the K-20 body).
Image IQ is essentially the same....and that ultimately what counts.
I will say had my 100D flash mount not broken (totally my fault lol), then this would not be an issue...I would have waited for the K7 to hit about 1k.
But at this point I suppose I'll skip out and see what happens over the next 3 years....and enjoy my K20D! The K100D still makes for a great availible light camera, but I find myself using my flashgun too often. Now I think when I want to look serious I'll put a tele on the 100D and a walk around on the K20....that'll make people think I'm pro