I cannot believe this freaking board ***With Update***

Dadofamunky

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2005
2,184
0
0
Well, I got the board in my sig at Christmas and built a new system around it. Since then, I've been experimenting with Intel overclocking for the first time in quite a few years.

I have to report that the MicroATX P5E-VM HDMI board is a stunning little overclocker for what it is. For about a month I've been running the configuration in my sig, with a rock-solid 998 MHz overclock. At 1.525V CPU settings and 1.42V northbridge, I could not get past that point for love or money with Prime95 stability. (For those wondering: I've been running 12-13 hour tests overnight, because at some point I have to use this computer to do work.)

I'm running an e6750 Prime stable, 39C idle/62C load (supposedly), at 3.70 GHz. (The type of stuff I do almost never loads the system the way Prime does.) I might be able to squeeze another 100 MHz or so out of it, but I'm not interested in jacking up the voltage any higher than present, because my temps appear to be just fine and I want to keep them that way. (Plus I don't want to smoke the chip or the mobo.) So, a 1.04 GHz overclock, representing a 39% increase over stock. Man. This is by far the most successful OCing experience I've ever had. This thing scales significant heights now and getting an e8400 or e8500 might buy me a few hundred more megahertz in OCing, but at this level I'm not sure the expense and effort in swapping CPUs, dealing with the thermal paste mess and fighting the heat sink installation are worth it.

With MicroATX, one downside is that you won't be able to use any of those decadent, flagrantly crazy aircooler heat sink/fan combos like the Tuniq Tower. Scythe Ninja and even the Arctic Freezer 7 will not fit. In MicroATX builds, your options are typically limited. I went with a Zalman CNPS8700 low-profile cooler, but its operation is close to silent at reasonable speeds, appears to do a quite serviceable cooling job and it fits into my case. You can see the result here.
The system is just barely cramped enough so that an Arctic Freezer 7 will not fit, which is typical for a MicroATX build. Still with the Lian-Li case noted in my signature, not too many compromises had to be made.

Well, after a month of 3.64 GHz operation I bumped up the voltage one more notch on the CPU and the Northbridge, to 1.5375 and 1.43V respectively, to see if I could get past the FSB wall I was encountering at 455. Now, I've busted this thing through to 468 MHz FSB, successfully run 3DMark, but had Prime95 fail after two minutes. Spinning it back down to 463 MHz FSB, I'm running this little MicroATX board with e6570 at 3.70 GHz Prime stable for 10 hours, which is all I've had time for. Because 3DMark is influenced by CPU speed, I ran it several times and came out with my personal record of 11878, which means precisely nothing, but is still a bit of fun. Also, 3DMark06 has this nice little shooter game you can play once you buy the software. This system, needless to say, runs it maxed out. It also enables maximum eye candy in my favorite game, Oblivion, which I am hopelessly bad at but always come back to for more abuse.

The overclocking features appear to be pretty much comprehensive. The P5E-VM HDMI has a category in the BIOS called JumperFree Configuration, where most of the key OCing settings are located. Multiplier, FSB, Northbridge, CPU voltage, memory latency settings. As I understand it, the JumperFree config matches up pretty much identically to most of Asus's enthusiast-level motherboards. Given this board costs over $140, this makes sense.

Here is a screen cap illustrating my measurement, for what they're worth.">http://s9.photobucket.com/albu...rime_and_utilities.jpg</a> There have been some quite valuable discussions on temp measurement techniques on this board lately and I suggest checking them out; I'm too lazy to recap the ins and outs of successful temp measurements in our highly uncertain Intel environments at this point.

Here is a cap of the 3DMark Results. Based on previous readings in the video Card and OCing secitons, I'm pretty sure that if I were running this under XP, one could add about 1000 points to the result.

The Intel G35 Express, which this board is based upon, offers an IGP that is strong anough to run Aero and is DX10 compliant, for whatever that's worth. (It still gets only 1.0 in the Vista evaluation.) The G35 is Intel's most current MicroATX chip set. The real kicker is that the board sports an HDMI port that is supposedly fully HDCP-compliant. The user can adapt the HDMI port to DVI if necessary, and an analog 15-pin VGA port also is provided. within several weeks, I plan to pop a Blu-Ray drive into this system, couple it with AnyDVD HD, and experiment with Hi-def HTPC playback. (I don't have an HDCP-compliant monitor, so without AnyDVD, playback will not work on my system. Such is life in the DRM universe.) So I'll be putting this thing through its hi-def paces in the near future and I'll post again when my testing is complete.

Another beautiful thing Asus did with this board was to include an Intel ICH9R I/O chip, which is not a mandated part of G35 Express. Because of this. the P5E-VM HDMI board supports RAID 0, RAID 0+1, RAID 5 and RAID 10. Not bad for a MicroATX system. Of course, I opted for RAID 0 with a couple of inexpensive Seagate 7200.10 250GB drives, and the drives are basically inaudible. (Shortly, I'll buy an external 500GB drive for disc imaging.) The only thing I wish this board had is an E-SATA port, but I can buy a cheap plug-in adapter to do the same thing.

Asus also provides a useful module for those extremely annoying little two-wire/header connectors for things like that all-important Power switch, the Reset switch and so on, which are often badly marked out on even enthusaist motherboards. This little white module header makes those connectons painless and easier to deal with should you need to make future upgrades. 6 Sata headers are also provided, a full PCI slot, a PCI-E x1 slot and and a PCI-E X16 slot for video cards.

Memory support appears to be quite solid, providing 4 DIMM slots and a full slate of memory tweaking settings, most of which I have absolutely no clue about. I opted for DDR2-1000 RAM that was serious overkill for my applications but I wanted to have significant headroom for OCing, even the supposed best DDR2-800 memory did not offer enough guaranteed headroom to suit me, and I never expected to max out the RAM. Even with an 8 multiplier CPU (this is the only reason I'd think about installing an E8400 at some point) I'm pretty sure I'm nowhere near the ultimate FSB barrier on this board. Even if I am, a 9 multiplier could take care of that, and as things stand now it's difficult to see a marginal utility to a CPU upgrade. Anyway, at some point I'm really tempted to do an upgrade from 4 GB to 8 GB (using two more of the same sticks of course). I hear through the grapevine that running 4 2GB DIMMS can cause havoc with OCed systems; getting Blu-Ray and an external backup drive are higher priorities at this point. At some point I'll probably do a Penryn upgrade out of sheer boredom. even my current CPU would make for an extremely luxy HTPC setup.

Apparently, MicroATX motherboards have a rep for not being tweakable, compensating for this by allowing for somewhat more portable systems and a couple of expansion slots, which you usually don't get with SFF. If my experience is anything to go by, this board changes all that. The BIOS on my board instance is dated 10/03/07, which is just before the P5E-VM HDMI was released in the United States. I've seen some extremely derogatory recent user reviews of this board on NewEgg (where I bought it). I couldn't be more pleased with this little beast. When I found out about it, it was just coming out. After the reading I was able to do on it, I just had a feeling that this board was going to be exactly what I wanted. It's turned out exactly that way, and with the HDMI port, this system will have a long and fruitful life in our household.

So, if you own this board, what are your experiences? If you do, are you happy with it? Are you using it for an HTPC setup with just the on-board video? Would you consider a high-performance MicroATX mobo? (This is pretty much the only one out there.) Of course, there's no SLI, But with the 9800x2 and 3870x2, that doesn't seem to be as serious a consideration for a decent system. Let's hear your thoughts.

***Update*** I've now run the system on Prime 25.6 for 13 hours and 36 minutes. I did have to bump the voltage again, it turns out. But at 1.55V my temps have not budged. Also, the safe limit for Core 2 Duo is 1.6V, so I'm at the limit of what I consider safe at this point.
 

ChunkyBarf

Senior member
Jan 26, 2001
231
0
0
Dadofamunky:

Congrats. What you describe is very impressive indeed. I suppose you might say big things do in fact come in small packages sometimes !

microATX boards are generally known for being conservative in terms of power consumption too. Do you have reason to believe your system runs on less power than a similarly equipped ATX motherboard?

Also, just out of curiosity, do you plan on putting this case somewhere with little to no ventilation? If so, how is it working for you?

Well done,
ChunkyBarf
 

Dadofamunky

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2005
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: ChunkyBarf
Dadofamunky:

Congrats. What you describe is very impressive indeed. I suppose you might say big things do in fact come in small packages sometimes !

microATX boards are generally known for being conservative in terms of power consumption too. Do you have reason to believe your system runs on less power than a similarly equipped ATX motherboard?

Also, just out of curiosity, do you plan on putting this case somewhere with little to no ventilation? If so, how is it working for you?

Well done,
ChunkyBarf

Well, given that I have a 650W power supply, my quess is that the board itself uses a little less power but the OCing cancels a lot of that out, and I've noticed my power bills increasing a bit since I brought the box online. If I was running HTPC only on this thing (which will happen eventually) I would probably throttle it back down to stock or at most 3.2 GHz (8x400), which is so easy it's like taking candy from a baby - no voltage bumps or anything needed for that, and I can run the RAM at CAS4 timings. But I just had to shoot for more.

Yeah, the ventilation worries me a little bit considering how I've jacked the system up. So for now I'm running wothout the case sides on. I find that the temps go up about 4-5 degrees when it's buttoned up.
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
Originally posted by: Dadofamunky
Apparently, MicroATX motherboards have a rep for not being tweakable

There have been super tweakable mATX boards since the Geforce6100 chipset came out.

Originally posted by: ChunkyBarf
microATX boards are generally known for being conservative in terms of power consumption too.

Nope, about the same power consumption.

Thing about mATX is that it is EXACTLY the same as ATX except missing the bottom three slots. Unfortunately of course manufacturers have their heads in their asses and ASSume that people don't want enthusiast level mATX boards. Seeing that ATX and mATX boards can and have used the same components, chipsets and CPUs, heat and power consumption is the same at the board level. Some mATX cases may not have the airflow of regular ATX cases though the Micro P180 resolves that handily.

It's just one of those things that people get their minds stuck on, like people who kept thinking Intel was better when A64 chips were kicking Netburst ass.

Anyways, I'm glad the OP likes that board. I'd get one, except I already have an Asus G33 chipset board (Asus P5K-VM) and don't think I'd get much out of an upgrade. I'm already overclocking my Xeon E3110 (basically an E8400) to 3.8GHz on that mATX board.
 

Mango1970

Member
Aug 26, 2006
195
0
76
Very well written. This actually gives me hope for my future HTPC. Currently running an AMD X2 4800+ stock with an ATI X1950XTX in a Sonata case. Works well but that's going to my dad soon so was hoping for something like this. My issue is that on my HTPC I encode and decode rar/unrar par for hours a day to get my movies set... so any bit of extra power is welcome.
 

DSF

Diamond Member
Oct 6, 2007
4,902
0
71
1.525V isn't too much Vcore for a Core2Duo? I had thought 1.5V was generally considered the limit.
 

Gillbot

Lifer
Jan 11, 2001
28,830
17
81
When I ran AMD, I loved my mATX T-Force biostar board. That thing was an OC beast and a tiny footpring to boot. unfortunately when I went intel, all of the better OC boards were standard ATX so I had to move up a case size. Especially to fit some of these monstrous coolers!
 

IL2SturmovikPilot

Senior member
Jan 31, 2008
317
0
0
I've seen this board get 3.7GHz with a E6850,but with a E6750? I'm very tempted to get one of these boards and a E2180 for a SFF PC i wanna build.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
What's the cooler you're using? I have a SFF pc and I'm looking into a short aftermarket cooler that performs better than the stock one.
 

boomhower

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2007
7,228
19
81
I love mine as well. It was the first Asus board I have had since the socket A days and I am pretty impressed with it. I am not crazy about the BIOS, it is good but the options are not very intiuitive. I really liked the way my IP35 Pro was better in that respect. I am using a much larger case so I have been able to use a larger heatsink. In all I really couldn't have asked for more. It has completed my goal of a almost dead silent(at least until my video card cranks up which isn't often) that can sit on my desktop.
 

Dadofamunky

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2005
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: bfdd
What's the cooler you're using? I have a SFF pc and I'm looking into a short aftermarket cooler that performs better than the stock one.

Zalman CNPS8700. Decent low-profile 120MM cooler....

Originally posted by: DSF
1.525V isn't too much Vcore for a Core2Duo? I had thought 1.5V was generally considered the limit.

Based on what I see at Intel's site, the max for normal operation is 1.6V. :)

Originally posted by: Mango1970
Very well written. This actually gives me hope for my future HTPC. Currently running an AMD X2 4800+ stock with an ATI X1950XTX in a Sonata case. Works well but that's going to my dad soon so was hoping for something like this. My issue is that on my HTPC I encode and decode rar/unrar par for hours a day to get my movies set... so any bit of extra power is welcome.

Thanks! Upthread I gave a link to an AMD-based solution that actually appears to have much better HD playback performance cycle for cycle than the current Intel G35 chipset. If you're gonna stick with AMD I think it's worth checking out. It's a MicroATX board from Gigabyte that has DVI, VGA and HDMI (and supports DisplayPort) all on the same board, and apparently outperforms Intel G35 Express by a 3:1 ratio on BluRay playback quality. They used an Intel e2180 against a 4800+ AMD equivalent. With Intel, CPU power could probably make a big difference, but it's nice to know that AMD has such a good choice for low-power enthusiasts out there. That board looks like a new contender for the HTPC crown.

Originally posted by: Zap

Nope, about the same power consumption.

Thing about mATX is that it is EXACTLY the same as ATX except missing the bottom three slots. Unfortunately of course manufacturers have their heads in their asses and ASSume that people don't want enthusiast level mATX boards. Seeing that ATX and mATX boards can and have used the same components, chipsets and CPUs, heat and power consumption is the same at the board level. Some mATX cases may not have the airflow of regular ATX cases though the Micro P180 resolves that handily.

It's just one of those things that people get their minds stuck on, like people who kept thinking Intel was better when A64 chips were kicking Netburst ass.

Anyways, I'm glad the OP likes that board. I'd get one, except I already have an Asus G33 chipset board (Asus P5K-VM) and don't think I'd get much out of an upgrade. I'm already overclocking my Xeon E3110 (basically an E8400) to 3.8GHz on that mATX board.

THAT'S interesting. Niiiice OC on the E3110. That's not an LGA 771? If you see this, can you let us know what your temps and voltages are?
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: bfdd
What's the cooler you're using? I have a SFF pc and I'm looking into a short aftermarket cooler that performs better than the stock one.

This Scythe Ninja Mini is the one that most of the HTPC crowd seems to be gaga over lately.
 

olmer

Senior member
Dec 28, 2006
324
0
0
My old e6600 runs solidly 24/7 at 3.6 (400x9) on a cheaper P5K-VM with auto vcore and speedstep on ? keeps below 60 under load. As it is HTPC (in Antec Fusion with AC 7 Pro) I now use 3.2 (stock 2.4 90% of time with speedstep). The only things i have done - replaced paste under chipset coolers and added some custom mosfet cooling to prolong board?s life. These boards are quite good. Recommendations are all over the net.
 

DSF

Diamond Member
Oct 6, 2007
4,902
0
71
Originally posted by: Dadofamunky

Based on what I see at Intel's site, the max for normal operation is 1.6V. :)

Interesting, where did you see that? I can't find it.
 

Dadofamunky

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2005
2,184
0
0
I have to admit, this is one slick-looking motherboard for $99.. I might do an AMD build in six months or so, since this board looks like you really don't need a video card for good HD playback. So that saves a chunk of money.

Originally posted by: myocardia
Originally posted by: bfdd
What's the cooler you're using? I have a SFF pc and I'm looking into a short aftermarket cooler that performs better than the stock one.

This Scythe Ninja Mini is the one that most of the HTPC crowd seems to be gaga over lately.

Here's what someone had to say about that cooler: "As someone else mentioned it is a PAIN to install. You really will have to remove your motherboard. Even with the motherboard out its hard to get the clips in because the fins are so huge and come down so low they block easy access. So -1 egg for that. The blades may not be as sharp as some other coolers, but I did leave some blood behind!"

Yeah, I think I'll stick with what I've got. I don't want a Purple Heart for installing a computer heatsink!

Originally posted by: DSF
Originally posted by: Dadofamunky

Based on what I see at Intel's site, the max for normal operation is 1.6V. :)

Interesting, where did you see that? I can't find it.

It IS hard to find.

This is Intel's 118-page datasheet
from the Intel site. The voltage characteristics are shown on Page 17 and fully described in pages 19-20. So this is the authoritative source and every CPU owner should have a copy of this on their hard drive. So this doc settles it: I'm at the max for the e6750.

Hmmmm. Maybe I WILL go for an e8400.
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
Originally posted by: Dadofamunky
Originally posted by: Zap
I'm already overclocking my Xeon E3110 (basically an E8400) to 3.8GHz on that mATX board.

THAT'S interesting. Niiiice OC on the E3110. That's not an LGA 771? If you see this, can you let us know what your temps and voltages are?

Don't know what temps are because Intel TAT (which was already installed on the system with the previous E4500) doesn't recognize the CPU. I have to say though that it runs pretty cool because the heatsink barely gets warm, and it is bolted down on the board.

Even if I raise the voltage in BIOS, doesn't seem to register. CPU-Z says it is running at 1.208v while at 3.825GHz. BIOS says a hair more (maybe around 1.23v or so).

The E3110 is socket LGA 775.

Originally posted by: myocardia
This Scythe Ninja Mini is the one that most of the HTPC crowd seems to be gaga over lately.

That's what I use (passively) in my HTPC cooling my stock speed A64 x2 5200+ (65W version). I don't do any ripping, just playback and TV tuner so even the 5200+ is overkill for my purposes.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Originally posted by: myocardia
Originally posted by: bfdd
What's the cooler you're using? I have a SFF pc and I'm looking into a short aftermarket cooler that performs better than the stock one.

This Scythe Ninja Mini is the one that most of the HTPC crowd seems to be gaga over lately.

WAY to tall for what I need WAY WAY to tall. I need something short like that Zalman or the Scythe Shuriken. With the stock intel HSF I have about 1" clearance in my Micro ATX case before the cooler hits the PSU. Case is a SG-03.

Also, Dadofamunky, if I didn't already have the 775 board for C2D I would of built an AMD rig, but I already had an e2140 laying around and an Abit Fatal1ty FN-I90HD I got for free. The onboard can do 720p really nicely, but I just purchased a 2600xt to do 1080p for bluray/hd-dvd. Plus I plan on using it as a lan box when I go out so I needed something slightly better than the onboard. I for sure would go with a mobo like you just linked, throw a 3650(they support hybrid right?) in it.
 

Nedder

Member
Oct 5, 2004
37
0
0
I have the P5E-VM DO (same board minus HDMI). The vdroop is pretty significant. If I set bios to 1.3, I get 1.28 and that slumps further to 1.23 at load. That means for 1.3V you have to set the bios to about 1.37V. I'm using an e4500 with stock HSF so I'm just doing a light overclock from 2.2 to 2.6ghz. The vdroop pencil mod works, I don't have a 2B/3B pencil handy though :)
 

Mondoman

Senior member
Jan 4, 2008
356
0
0
Originally posted by: Dadofamunky...But at 1.55V my temps have not budged. Also, the safe limit for Core 2 Duo is 1.6V, so I'm at the limit of what I consider safe at this point.
Here's what Intel says about running it at 1.55V (the voltage absolute maximum rating) and above:
At conditions exceeding absolute maximum and minimum ratings, neither functionality
nor long-term reliability can be expected. Moreover, if a device is subjected to these
conditions for any length of time then, when returned to conditions within the
functional operating condition limits, it will either not function, or its reliability will be
severely degraded.
Just wondering why you think 1.6V is safe...

 

ShockwaveVT

Senior member
Dec 13, 2004
830
1
0
Originally posted by: Zap
Don't know what temps are because Intel TAT (which was already installed on the system with the previous E4500) doesn't recognize the CPU. I have to say though that it runs pretty cool because the heatsink barely gets warm, and it is bolted down on the board.

Even if I raise the voltage in BIOS, doesn't seem to register. CPU-Z says it is running at 1.208v while at 3.825GHz. BIOS says a hair more (maybe around 1.23v or so).


Zap there are multiple programs which will display your CPU & Core temperatures for you... a quick google search should take you to their home pages.

a. Core Temp 0.97 (core temps only, but just updated)
b. Speedfan 4.33
c. CPUID Hardware Monitor
d. Everest

3.8 Ghz isn't that aggressive for an 8400/3110 but you should really monitor your temps.
 

ShockwaveVT

Senior member
Dec 13, 2004
830
1
0
Originally posted by: Mondoman
Originally posted by: Dadofamunky...But at 1.55V my temps have not budged. Also, the safe limit for Core 2 Duo is 1.6V, so I'm at the limit of what I consider safe at this point.
Here's what Intel says about running it at 1.55V (the voltage absolute maximum rating) and above:
At conditions exceeding absolute maximum and minimum ratings, neither functionality
nor long-term reliability can be expected. Moreover, if a device is subjected to these
conditions for any length of time then, when returned to conditions within the
functional operating condition limits, it will either not function, or its reliability will be
severely degraded.
Just wondering why you think 1.6V is safe...


Notice from his CPU-Z screenshot that his vCore is actually 1.440 thanks to the vDrop from BIOS settings to actual voltages. http://s9.photobucket.com/albu...rime_and_utilities.jpg

still rather high, and higher than many folks would run long-term but definitely not as life shortening as 1.5+ volts.

 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
Originally posted by: ShockwaveVT
3.8 Ghz isn't that aggressive for an 8400/3110 but you should really monitor your temps.

I typically only monitor temps when I'm testing out an overclock using Orthos. If temps are good under those conditions, then I never fire up the monitoring software again.

With this setup though I don't know what the temps are, the heatsink is so cool to the touch that I'm not too concerned - and yes it is bolted down tight. With the E4500 the heatsink actually got hot.
 

Dadofamunky

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2005
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: Mondoman
Originally posted by: Dadofamunky...But at 1.55V my temps have not budged. Also, the safe limit for Core 2 Duo is 1.6V, so I'm at the limit of what I consider safe at this point.
Here's what Intel says about running it at 1.55V (the voltage absolute maximum rating) and above:
At conditions exceeding absolute maximum and minimum ratings, neither functionality
nor long-term reliability can be expected. Moreover, if a device is subjected to these
conditions for any length of time then, when returned to conditions within the
functional operating condition limits, it will either not function, or its reliability will be
severely degraded.
Just wondering why you think 1.6V is safe...

Later I changed my mind and throttled it back a notch. I expect to replace the CPU within less than a year... then it will be added to my collection. As noted upthread, the vdroop is pretty drastic undeer load, and well within tolerance. I frankly want to go to a higher-multiplier CPU fairly soon. The OC is running like a tank, and the HSF is cold.