I am surprised . . .Fallout 3 performance

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Got a little bored last night, and wiped one of my test machines. Its an Inspiron 531, an A64X2 2.1Ghz with 2GB of RAM and a Radeon 4350 512MB. Since its a Dell desktop and I happen to have 'acquired' several Dell OS disks, I installed XP Pro on it. Installed and updated everything to the most current drivers available, installed Steam and downloaded Fallout 3.

Under my machine machine, a Windows 7 64bit machine, FO3 is an unstable POS and never stays up for more than 15 minutes without a crash to the desktop. But, my E8500 and 4870 have the processing power to run it at maximum settings with impunity.

I did not expect the Inspiron 531 to run FO3 very well, but I was pleasantly surprised. The game's autodetect function after install set it to run at 1280x720, with high quality settings, even 4x AA and 8 sample anisotropic. I backed off the AA to zero, but left all the other settings as they were. The game is mostly playable, the frame rate drops into a jittering state during large explosions and when entering large new areas, but it catches up before too long. Not too shabby.

The passively cooled Radeon 4350 gets pretty toasty, and the systems fans consistently ramp up every few minutes.

The game, however, is stable. Or seems to be anyway, so long as you don't alt-tab out. If I can pick up a 5600+ and a slightly better card, the game should be fully playable on this box, I would think.

Just sharing.

Edit -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallout_3#Bethesda_Softworks <--- System requirements. The Inspiron 531 is barely skirting the minimum requirements. Guess they are pretty realistic.
 
Last edited:

skyofavalon

Senior member
Jul 11, 2007
328
0
71
sometimes those old machines will surprise you. I put Left 4 Dead on my 1.8 ghz Duron,x1650 pro system a while ago.It was somewhat playable on low settings.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Thread topic are for the topic of threads. They're to help people decide whether the thread is of interest to them.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Thread topic are for the topic of threads. They're to help people decide whether the thread is of interest to them.

Trolling is for thread trolls.

FO3 still isn't stable though, has crashed twice on me. Would have been over a dozen times on my main machine.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Hmm, I've heard tons of complaints about FO3, but I've played it through to the end on two totally different systems with zero crashes, well one was without DLC and one was complete. I hope I'm as lucky with FO:NV.
 

BD231

Lifer
Feb 26, 2001
10,568
138
106
Yeah ... who'd of thought altering graphical settings would net you decent performance on entirely capable hardware ...
 
Last edited:

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Bethesda + Gamebryo engine = crashes, I've had them with Oblivion and FO3 using two different systems with nV and ATI cards. These were both gaming systems with almost nothing extra installed.

For me under XP both Oblivion and FO3 were stable enough, only crashing after a decent amount of time (up to a couple of hours).
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Yeah ... who'd of thought altering graphical settings would net you decent performance on entirely capable hardware ...

I wouldn't classify an X2 4000 and a 4350 'capable'. :p

The system got a massive boost in performance with the 4350 vs the 6150SE IGP, but its still extremely weak.

I actually have two Inspiron 531s, the other has an X2 3800 and still uses the IGP. The plan is to drop in X2s 5600+/6000+s into each, after a PSU upgrade. They've only got 300W Dell PSUs in them now. When I drop a 6870 into the main machine, I'll move the old 4870 into one of them. A 2.9-3Ghz X2 with a 4870 should offer quite a bit more performance than the 4350, with the stability bump, I might actually be able to finish the game. :p
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Those Dell 300W PSUs are tougher than they seem, but yeah for a 4870 I'd recommend an upgrade. Just the CPU swap shouldn't be a problem for the stock PSU though.
 

BD231

Lifer
Feb 26, 2001
10,568
138
106
I wouldn't classify an X2 4000 and a 4350 'capable'. :p

The system got a massive boost in performance with the 4350 vs the 6150SE IGP, but its still extremely weak.

I actually have two Inspiron 531s, the other has an X2 3800 and still uses the IGP. The plan is to drop in X2s 5600+/6000+s into each, after a PSU upgrade. They've only got 300W Dell PSUs in them now. When I drop a 6870 into the main machine, I'll move the old 4870 into one of them. A 2.9-3Ghz X2 with a 4870 should offer quite a bit more performance than the 4350, with the stability bump, I might actually be able to finish the game. :p

A 2ghz dual core CPU and a 4000 series GPU with about 128 to 512mbs of ram is the standard for AMD laptops right now.

Gaming performance is of course, excellent.

The 4000 series cards do a lot better than I ever would have expected them to as well. I just built a Phenom II x3 system for a friend who decided he'd stick with the integrated 4250 being that performance was so good.

Definitely a good buy.