I Am Ripoff, I mean Legend

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zim Hosein

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Super Moderator
Nov 27, 1999
65,438
408
126
Originally posted by: Baked
Where did the OP go? Too much pwnage?

Hopefully outside to rent The Last Man on Earth & The Omega Man on DVD Baked! :p
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
Just stay on the fail boat, skipper. Everything will be all right. 28 days later. Or was it 28 weeks later, I forget. You can eat crabby balls with seaman sauce while you wait. :beer::p
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
God damn, 28 Weeks Later is on HBO right now. I prefer the charming pleasantry of Lord of the Rings battle sequences to this.
Those poor camera operators must have had HUGE muscles in their arms from shaking the damn cameras so much.
 

theshad

Member
Apr 15, 2008
113
0
71
I Am Legend with the original ending was awful, the alternate ending was slightly better.
 

LtPage1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2004
6,311
2
0
Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy
I Am Legend > 28 Days Later. At least I Am Legend had a good plot.

Well, there's nothing that isn't completely wrong here. I Am Legend was reasonably entertaining, but 28 Days Later was actually a good movie, with serious depth.

But seriously,
Virus creates zombies.
Its contagious to everyone except a minor few.
Entire island/city has to be evacuated (Manhattan vs England).
Survivors must travel to the last known survivor camp.
Survivors broadcast messages via radio to alert other survivors.
refers to EVERY apocalyptic monster/zombie movie ever made. There were dozens of them, decades before 28 Days Later. So OP is pwnt, even if I Am Legend wasn't based on a 1950's novel. Which it is.

 

Enig101

Senior member
May 21, 2006
362
0
0
I liked 28 Days Later a lot, it had a cool atmosphere. I Am Legend was just a lot of good solo acting by Will Smith.

Both movies are good, but...

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.. ripoff?.. Hahahahahahahahahahaha... etc
 

Soundmanred

Lifer
Oct 26, 2006
10,780
6
81
So now you're saying that 28 Days Later was a ripoff of the original (Last Man/Omega Man) and then I Am Legend was a ripoff of 28 Days Later?
That's even worse.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Originally posted by: Agentbolt
No, the woman still had the virus, she just didn't exhibit any symptoms. She's a carrier. She still had the virus, therefore she's not immune to it.

Join edro in the failing corner, failure.

The woman in #2 is sort of the anti-thesis to the man in #1. The man in #1 was able to duplicate the virus with intense human emotions of rage. The woman in #2 was able to suppress the virus with intense human emotions of sympathy? Perhaps? Forgiveness? They thought it was some sort of gene that would pass onto their children, but it seemed to just be a trend in the series where by specific individuals can accomplish great feats of willpower over the virus. It is one of the most interesting parts of both stories, IMO.

Also, 28 series is fucking leaps and bounds over the movie version of I am Legend. If for the no other reason that the retarded butterfly "all things have meaning" bullshit. Yea. He cracked the glass in a butterfly formation. Ok. Go choke on a grenade and die. Oh you did, thanks.

Edit: Also, while I definitely would not want to bother arguing I am Legend as a ripoff of 28 days. It is worth mentioning that just because a movie is based off of a very old book, it does not mean it can't ripoff a more a recent movie. Most movies based on books take an overwhelming number of liberties towards their source of origin. Those liberties can then be wholly unique or 'inspired' by another source.
 

Raduque

Lifer
Aug 22, 2004
13,140
138
106
Originally posted by: dreadpiratedoug
Originally posted by: edro
I watched I Am Legend this weekend via Netflix.

WTF... this is a huge, blatant ripoff of 28 Days Later (2002).
Maybe 28 Days Later is a ripoff of another movie, in which case, I am late on my rant.

Anyway, it's not just a zombie movie... it has many of the exact same scenes and plots.

Virus creates zombies.
Its contagious to everyone except a minor few.
Entire island/city has to be evacuated (Manhattan vs England).
Survivors must travel to the last known survivor camp.
Survivors broadcast messages via radio to alert other survivors.

At least on I Am Legend the zombies were harmed by UV light... otherwise, this would have been the exact same movie.

28 Days Later was much much better IMO.
Much lower budget, I am sure... but it used real actors, not horrible looking CG.

All your marketing crap can't make a movie great.


They weren't zombies, they were vampires dumbass.

Also, it wasn't just Manhattan. It was the entire world.