- Nov 3, 1999
- 4,927
- 0
- 0
Okay, maybe I should say 2.4B!
1.65V for only 3.1Ghz (173X18)???? that's only 700Mhz increase w/ 0.125V increase!!!!!!
I had a 1.6A running 2.4Ghz @ 1.65V too........and that's 800Mhz increase w/ only .05V increase.
why are you guys seems so happy w/ 2.4B?
1.65V for only 3.1Ghz (173X18)???? that's only 700Mhz increase w/ 0.125V increase!!!!!!
I had a 1.6A running 2.4Ghz @ 1.65V too........and that's 800Mhz increase w/ only .05V increase.
why are you guys seems so happy w/ 2.4B?