Granted, in Bowling for Columbine he misled the viewers to make a point, but that doesn't change the fact that a lot of the points he made were valid. His series of points about America as an aggressor and overstepping our bounds in other counties affairs was a good piece of the movie. Those were good points.
But really, Michael Moore just represents the other side. There are fanatics on both sides. There are crazy conservatives like some members of the NRA and the Christian Collilition among others. Then there are groups on the other side...people like Michael Moore and groups like the ACLU. Both sides are needed for the system to function. The extremists both push their radical views, and the end result generally falls somewhere in the middle which serves to please most Americans.
Now I will say, yes I am a liberal but I have just been bothered by the bashing of Michael Moore and point out his 'lies' while no one recognizes the point of his film or the fact that he isnt the only one who tells half truths to make his opinions known.
-doug
But really, Michael Moore just represents the other side. There are fanatics on both sides. There are crazy conservatives like some members of the NRA and the Christian Collilition among others. Then there are groups on the other side...people like Michael Moore and groups like the ACLU. Both sides are needed for the system to function. The extremists both push their radical views, and the end result generally falls somewhere in the middle which serves to please most Americans.
Now I will say, yes I am a liberal but I have just been bothered by the bashing of Michael Moore and point out his 'lies' while no one recognizes the point of his film or the fact that he isnt the only one who tells half truths to make his opinions known.
-doug