Hypothetical question: If suicide is illegal, why isn't abortion?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Deeko
I see the game your playing. You're trying to twist the argument to make your point relevant. Well, as several here have pointed out - it's not gonna fly. The debate over abortion largely lies with when human life begins, which is why your question in the OP is irrelevant.

There's really nothing else you can say, although I'm sure you will.

Again, that's a conservative basis for having an argument on abortion. That's where they would like to start. Liberals would like to start elsewhere. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

If you play sports, do you prefer to have home-court advantage?

And yet, you're ignoring all the liberals in this thread that are disagreeing with you on the whole 'life begins at conception' thing. Convenient for you, isn't it?

Sorry but I don't consider ATOT to be the definitive opinion on the matter from a liberal POV. I look at court cases and partisan groups.
:roll: so you're posting a question about ATOT's opinion on abortion, but now you say you don't care about ATOT's opinion?

Isn't that the definition of trolling?
 

Turin39789

Lifer
Nov 21, 2000
12,218
8
81
Originally posted by: mjuszczak
Originally posted by: Turin39789
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: zinfamous

You assume that women who choose to have an abortion think it is a happy occasion, and perhaps one worth repeating.

Of course, many people here think you are wrong...

I assumed nothing. And you failed terribly at putting words into my mouth. I said "specified" time, meaning not always/

you assumed what liberals and conservatives are allowed to believe/argue.


Now answer my question, why are you trolling in OT with an abortion thread?

I don't think he's trolling. A quick search shows many abortion threads in OT. I don't think pro-choice vs. pro-life is completely political. It's more a personal decision, like religion (and religion stuff gets talked about all the time in OT). it's more of a social one. And it definitely isn't news anymore.

It's inherently political because it is a debate over a legal issue, and it always belongs in P&N because it is always bitter back and forths with no chance that either said will change their mind.

Every thread is just a provocation, and an excuse for an argument. That is the only outcome of abortion threads.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
Originally posted by: Dari
The problem with this thread is that there aren't enough inputs from women.

I've never met a woman that was not pro-choice some degree.

KT
 

manlymatt83

Lifer
Oct 14, 2005
10,051
44
91
Originally posted by: destrekor
Originally posted by: mjuszczak
maybe this is the basis of your confusion? there is no "pro-abortion" opinion, at least not among liberals. pro-choice /= pro-abortion. no one in this debate is a fan of abortion.

I whole-heartedly disagree. I have seen tons of people who use abortion as a method of birth control. Perhaps unconsciously, perhaps consciously. If people are using the attitude of "Who cares, there's always abortion", then to me they are pro-abortion.

If; however, pro-choice people were MOSTLY pro-choice because of the attitude of "birth control fails", or "what if I get raped?" or "What if incest occurs?", then it's a different story entirely.

Um, the only people who, as you say, simply look at abortion as further means of birth-control, are all immature and retarded. That is far from even a decent minority of people. Almost everyone pro-choice is as you latter described, as the option of 'if birth control fails', or various other concepts. Most women understand that abortion is not an enjoyable procedure, and should simply be there as an option if something goes wrong and they get pregnant and they know they cannot raise the child. But numerous other mothers are then also, well the accident happens, and will raise the child anyhow. Good for them. But it should definitely be pro-choice.

I'm not going to divulge whether I'm pro-life, pro-choice, or somewhere in the middle, but I do have to say coming from the point of view of someone who is pro-choice (you), your argument is well put and a fair argument.

However, I still must disagree and say that the population I describe is larger than you think.
 

hanoverphist

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2006
9,867
23
76
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Turin39789
Originally posted by: Dari
You must be confused because you keep putting the conservative argument into the liberal's mouth and twist it 180 degrees. Liberals don't argue that point. They don't WANT to argue that point. Only conservatives do. Reversely, conservatives don't want to argue about state control of a person's body or about women's right.

snip.

No. You are wrong.

I is liberal. I argue fetus is not human life until a certain point.

Why the hell did you make an abortion thread in OT? Is P & N.


Fail.
Fail.
Fail.

When is the turning point?

mebbe when it resembles a human, not a chicken? somewhere around the 3rd month. or so ive heard. ive never seen this so-called zygote, so im not even sure it exists.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Deeko
I see the game your playing. You're trying to twist the argument to make your point relevant. Well, as several here have pointed out - it's not gonna fly. The debate over abortion largely lies with when human life begins, which is why your question in the OP is irrelevant.

There's really nothing else you can say, although I'm sure you will.

Again, that's a conservative basis for having an argument on abortion. That's where they would like to start. Liberals would like to start elsewhere. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

If you play sports, do you prefer to have home-court advantage?

And yet, you're ignoring all the liberals in this thread that are disagreeing with you on the whole 'life begins at conception' thing. Convenient for you, isn't it?

Sorry but I don't consider ATOT to be the definitive opinion on the matter from a liberal POV. I look at court cases and partisan groups.
:roll: so you're posting a question about ATOT's opinion on abortion, but now you say you don't care about ATOT's opinion?

Isn't that the definition of trolling?

See bolded.
 
Nov 29, 2006
15,882
4,435
136
How about we all just let other make their own choices in life and stop trying to impose your views on them?

Or we can go barbaric and just say that the point of conception is delivery. Anytime while it is still in the womans body is ok to abort. I dont like this idea but maybe it will get some people to drop the subject and let other live their own lives.
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Originally posted by: soulcougher73
How about we all just let other make their own choices in life and stop trying to impose your views on them?

Or we can go barbaric and just say that the point of conception is delivery. Anytime while it is still in the womans body is ok to abort. I dont like this idea but maybe it will get some people to drop the subject and let other live their own lives.

I completely agree with that idea. Delivery is the moment it is a baby, and at no other time.
Considering how many times does someone get excited they are having a baby, and then in the last few weeks, it dies and is stillborn... a baby is not a guarantee until it is actually born, and from there, other factors take place. If its in the womb, the mother has full control over it imho.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,857
31,346
146
Originally posted by: mjuszczak
maybe this is the basis of your confusion? there is no "pro-abortion" opinion, at least not among liberals. pro-choice /= pro-abortion. no one in this debate is a fan of abortion.

I whole-heartedly disagree. I have seen tons of people who use abortion as a method of birth control. Perhaps unconsciously, perhaps consciously. If people are using the attitude of "Who cares, there's always abortion", then to me they are pro-abortion.

If; however, pro-choice people were MOSTLY pro-choice because of the attitude of "birth control fails", or "what if I get raped?" or "What if incest occurs?", then it's a different story entirely.

well, that is what pro-choice people advocate. No one with any rationality supports abortion as simply a method of birth control. This is not the pro-choice stance, and it is despicable that conflicting interests groups lump that sentiment into the pro-choice camp.

The pro-choice is argument is one that advocates freedom of individual choice, First and foremost, and rejects federal attempts to restrict the ability of the individual to make informed, conscious decisions regarding their own, personal health.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,857
31,346
146
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Here ju go

http://8e.devbio.com/article.php?id=162

Summary for the ADHD:
Science has not been able to give a definitive answer to this question.

Metabolic View: .. a single developmental moment marking the beginning of human life does not exist. Both the sperm and egg cells should individually be considered to be units of life in the same respect as any other single or multicellular organism. Thus, neither the union of two gametes nor any developmental point thereafter should be designated as the beginning of new life.

Genetic View: Although the opinion that life begins at fertilization is the most popular view among the public, many scientists no longer support this position, as an increasing number of scientific discoveries seem to contradict it. there is no "moment of fertilization" .. Scientists now choose to view fertilization as a process that occurs over a period of 12-24 hours. .. with an additional 24 hours required to complete the formation of a diploid individual. The most popular argument against the idea that life begins at the moment of fertilization - the "twinning argument." .. although a zygote is genetically unique .. it is possible for that zygote to split into 2 or more up until 14 or 15 days after fertilization. .. the zygote has not completed the process of individuation and is not an ontological individual.

Embryological View: .. states that human life originates not at fertilization but rather at gastrulation. Gastrulation commences at the third week of pregnancy.

Neurological view: .. all forms of life on earth are finite. Contemporary American society defines death as the loss of the pattern produced by a cerebral electroencephalogram (EEG). If life and death are based upon the same standard of measurement, then the beginning of human life should be recognized as the time when a fetus acquires a recognizable EEG pattern: 24- 27 weeks after the conception of the fetus and is the basis for the neurological view of the beginning of human life.

Ecological / Technological view: .. of when human life begins designates the point when an individual can exist separately from the environment in which it was dependent for development (i.e., its mother's womb)

so, please keep using science to define "life." It makes you look foolish.

So science has no consensus. That just goes to prove that there is no scientific evidence that there is a single moment in time when life appears. One can only assume it is continuous.

yet..in your own words:
And there is no instantaneous time when a zygote/fetus turns into a human, it always is so that argument doesn't make much sense.

again, care to back up your argument that a fetus/zygote is always human? You continue to dodge this assertion of yours, or you simply forget that you've made this statement.

The problem with many pro-lifers, is they have a nasty habit of misreading scientific data and perverting it to their own needs. This is not a practice acceptable within the scientific community when it comes to peer-reviewed research, and it is not considered appropriate of interests groups to misrepresent published scientific research in a false manner.

If you're still confused, there is no scientific research that shows a fertilized embryo is always human. Making such a statement at this time can only be considered one of personal opinion, or perhaps faith. Yet, you've suggested there is a hard truth that your perspective is the proper one.

....from were do you draw you truth? Do you consider the source of your truth a valid enough source to shape public policy and limit individual freedoms?
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,760
18,944
136
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Originally posted by: Dari
The problem with this thread is that there aren't enough inputs from women.

I've never met a woman that was not pro-choice some degree.

KT

That's because they're not allow to leave the compound.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Topic Title: Hypothetical question: If suicide is illegal, why isn't abortion?

That's not a hypothetical question, it's just a question.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,857
31,346
146
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: zinfamous

You assume that women who choose to have an abortion think it is a happy occasion, and perhaps one worth repeating.

Of course, many people here think you are wrong...

I assumed nothing. And you failed terribly at putting words into my mouth. I said "specified" time, meaning not always/

Amazingly (though not surprisingly), you disregard the intent of my response and ignore the issue that I am addressing with your comment. I guess quoting me out of context is one manner of your attack, a method of confusing the issue and distorting general perception.

Here is your comment that I am responding to:

Funny how you never responded to the fact that I said the primary reason behind pro-abortion opinions is simply the right to choose, a liberal attack line.

now, looking at my response that you quoted, how does my response seem relevant in regard to time of life? I'm responding to your confusion over the values of pro choice, versus the perverted interpretation of that issue into one of pro-abortion.

again, learn to read, contextualize, and you might be worthwhile in a debate. You certainly aren't at this point.

so, to re-clarify: There is no pro-abortion opinion; at least not in liberal, pro-choice circles. PRO-CHOICE /= PRO-ABORTION[/b]

Do you honestly think that the majority of women who choose abortions do so happily? That they will continue to abort fetuses because they derive so much pleasure?

You can waste as much time as you want claiming that "so many women use abortion as birth control," without ever backing up this worthless opinion, then responding to calls to present your data with "can't prove a negative, nah nah nah nah boo boo."

Of course, you would probably never realize that claiming such an activity is prevalent and statistically significant puts the burden of proof on you to back up this claim. Otherwise, the argument is invalid and unworthy of debate, much less support for policy.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,857
31,346
146
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Deeko
I see the game your playing. You're trying to twist the argument to make your point relevant. Well, as several here have pointed out - it's not gonna fly. The debate over abortion largely lies with when human life begins, which is why your question in the OP is irrelevant.

There's really nothing else you can say, although I'm sure you will.

Again, that's a conservative basis for having an argument on abortion. That's where they would like to start. Liberals would like to start elsewhere. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

If you play sports, do you prefer to have home-court advantage?

And yet, you're ignoring all the liberals in this thread that are disagreeing with you on the whole 'life begins at conception' thing. Convenient for you, isn't it?

Sorry but I don't consider ATOT to be the definitive opinion on the matter from a liberal POV. I look at court cases and partisan groups.

and yet you continue to troll....
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,857
31,346
146
Originally posted by: mjuszczak
Originally posted by: Turin39789
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: zinfamous

You assume that women who choose to have an abortion think it is a happy occasion, and perhaps one worth repeating.

Of course, many people here think you are wrong...

I assumed nothing. And you failed terribly at putting words into my mouth. I said "specified" time, meaning not always/

you assumed what liberals and conservatives are allowed to believe/argue.


Now answer my question, why are you trolling in OT with an abortion thread?

I don't think he's trolling. A quick search shows many abortion threads in OT. I don't think pro-choice vs. pro-life is completely political. It's more a personal decision, like religion (and religion stuff gets talked about all the time in OT). it's more of a social one. And it definitely isn't news anymore.

Then you agree that it should be kept out of all future public elections?

Me too.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,857
31,346
146
Originally posted by: Dari
The problem with this thread is that there aren't enough inputs from women.

1: OP doesn't consider AT the definitive source of general consensus of opinion on abortion
--yet, OP continues to troll

2: met with a volley of descent regarding his trollish behavior, OP claims not enough women have commented, thus negating any attacks against him.

3: OP continues to ignore the fact that he posts on AT (even though he considers the forum irrelevant to his question), while demanding female opinion the only valid one (hey, I agree here)

3a: Repeat: OP posts on AT searching for the FEMALE opinion.
3ab: Repeat: OP posts on AT searching for the FEMALE opinion.


...has anything gotten through?
 

Kirby

Lifer
Apr 10, 2006
12,028
2
0
Hypothetical question: If a women is walking into an abortion clinic to get an abortion, and an assailant attacks her and kills the unborn child/fetus/babby, could he be charged?

flame+=fuel
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,857
31,346
146
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
Originally posted by: Dari


When is the turning point?

mebbe when it resembles a human, not a chicken? somewhere around the 3rd month. or so ive heard. ive never seen this so-called zygote, so im not even sure it exists.

Wait...really? Fine if you've never seen a zygote, but there are plenty of options available to see such a thing. Either way...even though it's common knowledge, part of our consensus of human understood reality, you still doubt its existence?

I'm not even sure you should have an opinion on this issue in the first place, as you clearly aren't educated concerning the issues involved.

Not meant as a personal attack, as I see such admissions frequently; and it's a common concern, I Think, that far too many people invest themselves in sensitive issues even though they remain largely ignorant (quantifiably so) over the actual facts regarding the core of the issue.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,857
31,346
146
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Originally posted by: Dari
The problem with this thread is that there aren't enough inputs from women.

I've never met a woman that was not pro-choice some degree.

KT

That's because they're not allow to leave the compound.

...except when they're selected to run for VP...
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Originally posted by: Dari
The problem with this thread is that there aren't enough inputs from women.

I've never met a woman that was not pro-choice some degree.

KT

That's because they're not allow to leave the compound.

...except when they're selected to run for VP...

Oh snap! :Q

KT
 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,666
21
81
Look at it this way, if both were illigal, they'll still do it.

Also:

Roe v. Wade is the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized that a woman has a constitutional right to decide whether to continue her pregnancy. The Court also ruled, however, that after fetal viability (that is, the point at which the fetus is able to live outside the woman?s body, with or without artificial aid), states may restrict abortions or ban them entirely, except when necessary to protect the woman?s life or health.

What people are fighting over now is when a baby is considered a living object. Catholics believe it's the point of conception (penis + vagina + baby batter = screwed). Others believe that killiing something that does not even have heart beat yet, is not killing at all.