Win XP Home Edition: A Bad Choice Gets Worse
Hyperthreading? Look Elsewhere
Intel is preparing to start providing hyperthreading in its mainstream processors, not just its server-oriented products. At a very simplistic level, hyperthreading treats one processor as two, harnessing unused clock cycles to process two separate streams of instructions. The performance gain can be anywhere from 15 to 30 percent, depending on the workload and instruction mix. It requires an operating system and application software that support multiple processors.
As you've no doubt guessed by now, Win XP Home doesn't support multiple processors. Win XP Pro does, and so does Windows 2000. Microsoft has no plans to add multiprocessor support to Home, having figured that home users would never need this feature, even though Intel had warned that it was coming?or else those who wanted the added capability could pay for a copy of Pro. Intel, meanwhile, is trying to cement and extend its performance lead by combining ever-faster CPUs with hyperthreading to handle multimedia processing and other high-end consumer tasks.
Do you pay more for your gasoline when you drive a minivan instead of a sedan? Why should you pay more for your operating system just because you choose a hardware platform with higher capacity? We can only hope the Microsoft folks will see the absurdity in the arbitrary differences between Win XP Home and Pro and make Pro the sole standard, at a price that keeps systems affordable. Or maybe they just like to cause as many problems as they solve.